Guest guest Posted July 16, 2004 Report Share Posted July 16, 2004 It is so easy to find local and state inspectors that are either unqualified to be inspectors or that should have their licenses revoked. All one needs to do is LOOK. Ken Moulton Man investigated in videotaping case employed by towns By ERICH LUENING CONTRIBUTING WRITER WEST TISBURY - The electrician who police say is under investigation for secretly videotaping the bathroom of an apartment he owns is still a wire inspector for the towns of Aquinnah and Chilmark, according to town officials. Although Lehman, 50, admitted in a written statement to police that he secretly installed a hidden camera in the bathroom to watch his female tenant take showers, town officials said there has been no decision to stop using him as an inspector. Lehman is the wiring inspector for Aquinnah and the assistant inspector for Chilmark. The longtime local contractor has not been charged as a result of the ongoing investigation. State and Tisbury police are currently analyzingcomputer equipment, digital cameras and videotapes seized from his house on June 27 after a female tenant found a hidden camera in the heating vent of her bathroom and called police. Investigators are expected to take weeks to determine whether Lehman broke any laws by secretly videotaping the tenant as she used her bathroom. It's also unclear under what statutes Lehman might be prosecuted. There is no state law against videotaping people without their knowledge, although there is legislation to outlaw secret videotaping, now before the state Senate Criminal Justice Committee. The committee could forward it to the full Senate for a vote as early as next week, according to , an adviser for State Sen. Creem, D-Newton, who sits on the committee. Wiring inspector's duties Tim Carroll, the executive secretary of Chilmark, said selectmen have not made a decision to stop using Lehman as that town's assistant wiring inspector and no one has raised any concern with town officials. " If there is a concern out there about [Lehman] being an inspector, they should come forward, " said Carroll. " All of his work is supervised by either the wiring inspector or the building inspector. They are the first line of oversight. " However, Lee Welch, the wiring inspector for Chilmark, said he isn't in charge of Lehman. " He does inspections that I can't get to and I do inspections he can't get to. " Welch explained that wiring inspectors look at any new wiring work done in the town. " Anything that requires a new permit we inspect. We inspect new homes, and other new installations. " Welch said the board of selectmen is in charge of hiring and firing Chilmark employees. But Carroll was quick to explain that in Chilmark the primary job of a wiring inspector is to do outside work on new houses. " It's not as though he would be wandering around people's private domains, " he said. In Aquinnah, where Lehman is the primary wiring inspector, Town Clerk Jeananne Jeffers said " as far as I know he is still the wiring inspector for the town... I won't comment on anything else. " Calls to building inspectors and selectmen for Aquinnah and Chilmark were not returned before deadline. The Board of State Examiners of Electricians, the body responsible for licensing electricians in the state, confirmed that Lehman had recently renewed his state master's and journeyman licenses for electrician contracting. " Now that allegations have been made, the board will monitor the case until there is a conviction, " said Goetcheus, a spokesman for the Massachusetts Division of Professional Licensure, the state overseer of professional licensing. " Once a conviction is made, the board will open a case to consider his licensing status. " Former tenants concerned A group of 14 women who used to be tenants of Lehman has consulted with Vineyard Haven attorney Geoghan Coogan and Brockton attorney Mone to prepare a potential civil action. Mone also represents the woman who found the hidden camera in her bathroom in June. In a written statement for Tisbury Police, Lehman told investigators he installed a camera in the apartment on June 26 to watch the female tenant take showers. The woman lived in the apartment at 460 lin St. in Tisbury with her two children, ages 10 and 12. On the evening of June 27, the woman told police she found the camera in the floor heater of her bathroom. The woman told police she pulled the camera out of the heater and discovered it was wired to the floor. Minutes after she pulled the camera from the heater, she heard a knock at the door. She told police that Lehman was at the door, and asked if he could inspect the furnace. She refused to let him in the apartment and called police. The woman told police she originally found the camera angled toward the toilet and shower. Later that evening, police said, Lehman told them initially that he had no idea what the camera was doing there. After police advised him of his rights, Lehman changed his story and said he had installed the camera 10 years ago to secretly watch another tenant shower. He would watch the video feed on a television inside his garage with friends. But in his written statement, Lehman changed the timeline again, saying he had installed the camera just recently to watch the current tenant take showers. Mone said that because Lehman initially said he had installed the camera 10 years ago, he set up a substantial timeline. " That is going back a long time. " Despite repeated calls, Lehman could not be reached for comment. (Published: July 16, 2004) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.