Guest guest Posted June 15, 2004 Report Share Posted June 15, 2004 Thanks, for your response to my question. It is good to have both sides of the issue in mind. I do not have the money for any new treatments at this time---just using my tested supplements, upping my water consumption (using a Brita pitcher) and beginning to test the foods that I put in my body. So far I feel as though I'm doing about all I can with the limited resources we have. I have not been eating organically, however, but that is my goal. There are good outlets here for organic foods and products. We need to make a comittment to stop eating out (except at organic restaurants!!) and the money we would save from that could be put towards buying organic foods! Your story is so interesting!!! I got the book from the library, one which is limited on health section. I got an email from one of the gals in my support group---she tried NAET for two years, said she spent a bunch of money on it, got some relief from her food allergies but no luck with chemical sensitivity---she avoids chemicals diligently, and I think that is about all one can do, seems like anyway. After a year of being off the NAET her food allergies crept back in---she said she had " leaky gut " ---I know that probiotics are good for that. She is much healthier now than I am, but she and her husband use an infrared sauna to detox and they are also totally organic in their eating habits and house products. I will write to you again at your personal email address. Thanks again! Ruth On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 15:54:52 -0500 " M. " <julie@...> writes: > Ruth, > You said: > > " Have any of you out there had a treatment called NAET---I'm > reading a > > book now by a chiropractor named Cutler, in which that seems to be > her > > primary mode of treatment for allergies and MCS. " > > I developed MCS in 1987 after being in an office where pesticides > were > routinely sprayed and then in a new office building. I've tried a > lot of > treatments and avoidance of chemicals... and accupressure-based > energy > modalities such as NAET are the only things that have improved my > health > dramatically. > The book you're reading must be one of Cutler's older books. She > does a > similar treatment now called Bioset. Yes, I have had the > accupressure-baswed > older NAET (Nambudripad Allergy Elimination Technique) and Bioset > treatments. These treatments allowed me to get rid of virtually all > of my > numerous, quite serious food sensitivities and have lessened my > chemical > sensitivities. I'm still working on chemicals. One can learn to do > the > treatments oneself. It helps to have a family member of friend who > can help. > Yes, they are weird, but they work. One of my friends who could not > even go > in a mall before says she could now work in a mall if she had to. > That's > dramatic. It was dramatic for me to be severely allergic to corn for > 18 > years and then in 20 minutes have corn cleared to the point that I > can eat 5 > ears at a time with no reaction! > > As with any treatments and practitioner, check out the practitioner > as > thoroughly as you can. There is an NAET listserve. There is > controversy > about whether Nambudripad's original method is better than Cutler's > newer > method. I've had both; both worked. The advantage of NAET was I > knew > immediately it would work; I was " cleared " for egg my first > treatment and no > longer reacted to it, for example. THis encouraged me to keep going. > The > disadvantage with the newest Bioset is that one clears for other > things > (hormones, one's own blood, etc.) first and it can be hard to know > immediately if it is working. (At least it was for me, perhaps > because I was > already better.) However, clearing for those things may make some > sensitivities just disappear. For most, this will be a long process. > Go to a > pr open to you learning to test and clear yourself if you can. I > think it's > helpful to go to a practitioner initially for the first 10 or so > treatments > and then have the pr on hand if you run into problems when treating > yourself. One must make a commitment and " appointments " with oneself > to be > successful at self-clearing or family clearings. I would not go to > someone > who wants to clear chemicals immediately. I think the body must > first be > strengthened by clearing vitamins, minerals, and common foods etc. > first. > Interestingly, I was " allergic " to calcium, which may explain why > despite > eating/drinking calcium throughout my life, I have osteopenia > (almost > osteoporosis) at age 48. By the way, these clearings can be quite > complex. > For example, something may not clear initially but then might if > combined > with the stomach acid. Contact me offlist for a more complete story > of my > successes. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 15, 2004 Report Share Posted June 15, 2004 Thanks, for your response to my question. It is good to have both sides of the issue in mind. I do not have the money for any new treatments at this time---just using my tested supplements, upping my water consumption (using a Brita pitcher) and beginning to test the foods that I put in my body. So far I feel as though I'm doing about all I can with the limited resources we have. I have not been eating organically, however, but that is my goal. There are good outlets here for organic foods and products. We need to make a comittment to stop eating out (except at organic restaurants!!) and the money we would save from that could be put towards buying organic foods! Your story is so interesting!!! I got the book from the library, one which is limited on health section. I got an email from one of the gals in my support group---she tried NAET for two years, said she spent a bunch of money on it, got some relief from her food allergies but no luck with chemical sensitivity---she avoids chemicals diligently, and I think that is about all one can do, seems like anyway. After a year of being off the NAET her food allergies crept back in---she said she had " leaky gut " ---I know that probiotics are good for that. She is much healthier now than I am, but she and her husband use an infrared sauna to detox and they are also totally organic in their eating habits and house products. I will write to you again at your personal email address. Thanks again! Ruth On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 15:54:52 -0500 " M. " <julie@...> writes: > Ruth, > You said: > > " Have any of you out there had a treatment called NAET---I'm > reading a > > book now by a chiropractor named Cutler, in which that seems to be > her > > primary mode of treatment for allergies and MCS. " > > I developed MCS in 1987 after being in an office where pesticides > were > routinely sprayed and then in a new office building. I've tried a > lot of > treatments and avoidance of chemicals... and accupressure-based > energy > modalities such as NAET are the only things that have improved my > health > dramatically. > The book you're reading must be one of Cutler's older books. She > does a > similar treatment now called Bioset. Yes, I have had the > accupressure-baswed > older NAET (Nambudripad Allergy Elimination Technique) and Bioset > treatments. These treatments allowed me to get rid of virtually all > of my > numerous, quite serious food sensitivities and have lessened my > chemical > sensitivities. I'm still working on chemicals. One can learn to do > the > treatments oneself. It helps to have a family member of friend who > can help. > Yes, they are weird, but they work. One of my friends who could not > even go > in a mall before says she could now work in a mall if she had to. > That's > dramatic. It was dramatic for me to be severely allergic to corn for > 18 > years and then in 20 minutes have corn cleared to the point that I > can eat 5 > ears at a time with no reaction! > > As with any treatments and practitioner, check out the practitioner > as > thoroughly as you can. There is an NAET listserve. There is > controversy > about whether Nambudripad's original method is better than Cutler's > newer > method. I've had both; both worked. The advantage of NAET was I > knew > immediately it would work; I was " cleared " for egg my first > treatment and no > longer reacted to it, for example. THis encouraged me to keep going. > The > disadvantage with the newest Bioset is that one clears for other > things > (hormones, one's own blood, etc.) first and it can be hard to know > immediately if it is working. (At least it was for me, perhaps > because I was > already better.) However, clearing for those things may make some > sensitivities just disappear. For most, this will be a long process. > Go to a > pr open to you learning to test and clear yourself if you can. I > think it's > helpful to go to a practitioner initially for the first 10 or so > treatments > and then have the pr on hand if you run into problems when treating > yourself. One must make a commitment and " appointments " with oneself > to be > successful at self-clearing or family clearings. I would not go to > someone > who wants to clear chemicals immediately. I think the body must > first be > strengthened by clearing vitamins, minerals, and common foods etc. > first. > Interestingly, I was " allergic " to calcium, which may explain why > despite > eating/drinking calcium throughout my life, I have osteopenia > (almost > osteoporosis) at age 48. By the way, these clearings can be quite > complex. > For example, something may not clear initially but then might if > combined > with the stomach acid. Contact me offlist for a more complete story > of my > successes. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 15, 2004 Report Share Posted June 15, 2004 Hi , Would you tell us what you mean by inexpensive treatment. Many of us MCS folks are porr from all the expensive visits. So inexpensive means very low cost!! Thanks Ruth On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 14:52:38 -0500 " M. " <julie@...> writes: > Someone stated that Dr. Devi Nambudripad does not believe her > treatments > work for chemical sensitivities. This is incorrect. > > Dr. Devi does make the claim herself that NAET can clear > sensitivities to > chemicals. She refers to them as " allergies " to chemicals. From her > web site > at www.naet.com: > An allergic reaction is simply an improper response of the immune > system to > an otherwise harmless substance such as foods, vitamins, > medications, > pollen, flowers, weeds, grasses, trees, dust, formaldehyde, > plastics, > metals, cats, dogs, fabrics, chemicals, heat, cold, etc. An allergic > person > can react to any substance around him and produce any usual or > unusual > health problems involving any and every parts and organs of the body > or it > can impair any functions of the body. > > Most of my severe food problems were sensitivities, not " allergies " > (IgE-mediated) that show up on traditional allergy tests. (However, > my > traditional allergists agreed when I broke out in hives head to toe > from > wheat that this was indeed a reaction... a sensitivity!) > I am living proof NAET and Bioset work. I have used both. Both work > for > chemical sensitivities as well as traditional allergies. > I was a skeptic. But NAET seemed like a safe, non-invasive, > inexpensive > treatment to try. These treatments continue to improve. I go to a > formerly > " traditional " MD who does the treatments. > , Minn. > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 15, 2004 Report Share Posted June 15, 2004 Hi , Would you tell us what you mean by inexpensive treatment. Many of us MCS folks are porr from all the expensive visits. So inexpensive means very low cost!! Thanks Ruth On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 14:52:38 -0500 " M. " <julie@...> writes: > Someone stated that Dr. Devi Nambudripad does not believe her > treatments > work for chemical sensitivities. This is incorrect. > > Dr. Devi does make the claim herself that NAET can clear > sensitivities to > chemicals. She refers to them as " allergies " to chemicals. From her > web site > at www.naet.com: > An allergic reaction is simply an improper response of the immune > system to > an otherwise harmless substance such as foods, vitamins, > medications, > pollen, flowers, weeds, grasses, trees, dust, formaldehyde, > plastics, > metals, cats, dogs, fabrics, chemicals, heat, cold, etc. An allergic > person > can react to any substance around him and produce any usual or > unusual > health problems involving any and every parts and organs of the body > or it > can impair any functions of the body. > > Most of my severe food problems were sensitivities, not " allergies " > (IgE-mediated) that show up on traditional allergy tests. (However, > my > traditional allergists agreed when I broke out in hives head to toe > from > wheat that this was indeed a reaction... a sensitivity!) > I am living proof NAET and Bioset work. I have used both. Both work > for > chemical sensitivities as well as traditional allergies. > I was a skeptic. But NAET seemed like a safe, non-invasive, > inexpensive > treatment to try. These treatments continue to improve. I go to a > formerly > " traditional " MD who does the treatments. > , Minn. > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 16, 2004 Report Share Posted June 16, 2004 Hi ... That was me who said Dr Devi made that statement. She did as my chiro is one of her teachers and he wanted to know why it never worked for me. Also, it really is erroneous to say that chemicals are harmless. THere are MSDS sheets that show they are not innoculouws and need to be heeded. Our food is tainted and I am of the firm conviction that the crap they use in conventional farming is creating more and often severe allergic responses. Lets deiscuss corn that you said you were able to eat after a treatment. I was highly reactive to corn to the point I stopped eating it. THen I said thats it I went all organic now I can eat it without any adverse interaction. SO I figured lets see if there is a problem with conventional corn. So I ate regualr corn and I got sick. Tried it again got sick. A week later tried the organic and nothing. Knowing full well that MonSATAN has tained almost all the corn in the USA its not surprising that people are getting sick. THey have created food that is resistant to Round Up along with injecting foods with genes from other plants...so, it's not unusual to discover you are allergic to something you never were reactive to...as it most likely could have been tainted or is GMO'ed. THere are so many products with the name HEALTHY that are made with GMO's its not even funny. HEalthy CHoice..BAD....yet, people would assume that it's a safer product..it's not. Most people with MCS and I mean the TRUE not some slight sensitivites will far much better on a true CERTIFIEC organic not just lab3eled organic diet. THere are different levels of organic and most manufacturers do get away with creating an image their product is a true organic. I deal with alt med drs, allopaths, people with all levels of MCS and you are the only one who has had ANY success with NAET. How long did you go for, did you change your dietary habits and go organic, did you detox your home did you start taking supplements? As most of that would create a less reactive environment. I am curious as you really are an anomaly. Angel On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, M. wrote: > Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 14:52:38 -0500 > From: M. <julie@...> > Reply- > > Subject: [] treatment called NAET > > Someone stated that Dr. Devi Nambudripad does not believe her treatments > work for chemical sensitivities. This is incorrect. > > Dr. Devi does make the claim herself that NAET can clear sensitivities to > chemicals. She refers to them as " allergies " to chemicals. From her web site > at www.naet.com: > An allergic reaction is simply an improper response of the immune system to > an otherwise harmless substance such as foods, vitamins, medications, > pollen, flowers, weeds, grasses, trees, dust, formaldehyde, plastics, > metals, cats, dogs, fabrics, chemicals, heat, cold, etc. An allergic person > can react to any substance around him and produce any usual or unusual > health problems involving any and every parts and organs of the body or it > can impair any functions of the body. > > Most of my severe food problems were sensitivities, not " allergies " > (IgE-mediated) that show up on traditional allergy tests. (However, my > traditional allergists agreed when I broke out in hives head to toe from > wheat that this was indeed a reaction... a sensitivity!) > I am living proof NAET and Bioset work. I have used both. Both work for > chemical sensitivities as well as traditional allergies. > I was a skeptic. But NAET seemed like a safe, non-invasive, inexpensive > treatment to try. These treatments continue to improve. I go to a formerly > " traditional " MD who does the treatments. > , Minn. > > > > > > FAIR USE NOTICE: > > This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 16, 2004 Report Share Posted June 16, 2004 Hi ... That was me who said Dr Devi made that statement. She did as my chiro is one of her teachers and he wanted to know why it never worked for me. Also, it really is erroneous to say that chemicals are harmless. THere are MSDS sheets that show they are not innoculouws and need to be heeded. Our food is tainted and I am of the firm conviction that the crap they use in conventional farming is creating more and often severe allergic responses. Lets deiscuss corn that you said you were able to eat after a treatment. I was highly reactive to corn to the point I stopped eating it. THen I said thats it I went all organic now I can eat it without any adverse interaction. SO I figured lets see if there is a problem with conventional corn. So I ate regualr corn and I got sick. Tried it again got sick. A week later tried the organic and nothing. Knowing full well that MonSATAN has tained almost all the corn in the USA its not surprising that people are getting sick. THey have created food that is resistant to Round Up along with injecting foods with genes from other plants...so, it's not unusual to discover you are allergic to something you never were reactive to...as it most likely could have been tainted or is GMO'ed. THere are so many products with the name HEALTHY that are made with GMO's its not even funny. HEalthy CHoice..BAD....yet, people would assume that it's a safer product..it's not. Most people with MCS and I mean the TRUE not some slight sensitivites will far much better on a true CERTIFIEC organic not just lab3eled organic diet. THere are different levels of organic and most manufacturers do get away with creating an image their product is a true organic. I deal with alt med drs, allopaths, people with all levels of MCS and you are the only one who has had ANY success with NAET. How long did you go for, did you change your dietary habits and go organic, did you detox your home did you start taking supplements? As most of that would create a less reactive environment. I am curious as you really are an anomaly. Angel On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, M. wrote: > Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 14:52:38 -0500 > From: M. <julie@...> > Reply- > > Subject: [] treatment called NAET > > Someone stated that Dr. Devi Nambudripad does not believe her treatments > work for chemical sensitivities. This is incorrect. > > Dr. Devi does make the claim herself that NAET can clear sensitivities to > chemicals. She refers to them as " allergies " to chemicals. From her web site > at www.naet.com: > An allergic reaction is simply an improper response of the immune system to > an otherwise harmless substance such as foods, vitamins, medications, > pollen, flowers, weeds, grasses, trees, dust, formaldehyde, plastics, > metals, cats, dogs, fabrics, chemicals, heat, cold, etc. An allergic person > can react to any substance around him and produce any usual or unusual > health problems involving any and every parts and organs of the body or it > can impair any functions of the body. > > Most of my severe food problems were sensitivities, not " allergies " > (IgE-mediated) that show up on traditional allergy tests. (However, my > traditional allergists agreed when I broke out in hives head to toe from > wheat that this was indeed a reaction... a sensitivity!) > I am living proof NAET and Bioset work. I have used both. Both work for > chemical sensitivities as well as traditional allergies. > I was a skeptic. But NAET seemed like a safe, non-invasive, inexpensive > treatment to try. These treatments continue to improve. I go to a formerly > " traditional " MD who does the treatments. > , Minn. > > > > > > FAIR USE NOTICE: > > This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 16, 2004 Report Share Posted June 16, 2004 AH ... I HAVE THE BOOK READ IT AND TRIED it... Next complaint! Angel On Wed, 16 Jun 2004, M. wrote: > Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 11:23:27 -0500 > From: M. <julie@...> > Reply- > > Subject: [] treatment called NAET > > I feel discussing Nambudripad Allergy Elimination Technique (NAET) is > somewhat off-topic for this listserve. But I'm having a hard time not > responding when people who know little about the subject are criticizing a > treatment I have read numerous books about, talked with numerous > practitioners about, and personally experienced success with for more than > five years from three practitioners. I do understand your skepticism because > I just blew it off when I first heard about these treatments; after all, I > wrote about chemical sensitivities and treatments for The Human Ecologist > (Human Ecology Action League pub) and thought I knew the best ways of > coping. : ) > Please read a book about NAET or Bioset or if you are interested in others' > success stories about NAET, go to > > http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/CGI/wa.exe > and join the NAET listserve. The listsowner was bedridden for several years > and could only eat 6 foods before she had NAET. > I have done many other things to deal with chemical sensitivities (1987 > onset) and serious food sensitivities. I live in a home with hot water heat > and no carpet, eat well, avoid many chemicals, etc. I've been to traditional > allergists (who offered little help except letters to my employers), > European-trained homeopaths, MD environmental medicine specialists, etc., > etc. I've gone on strict food rotation diets, etc., etc. The only thing that > has really, really made a difference is NAET and Bioset. I began treatments > about five years ago from an MD who used to be traditional MD. > Doris Rapp, MD, the allergist and best-selling author who has helped many > with chemical sensitivities through what used to be called " clinical > ecology, " favorably mentions these treatments in her newest book, Our Toxic > World; A Wake Up Call. > As with any new treatments, these are evolving and the success depends on > the patient and the practitioner and the practitioner's level of training. > This is not a quick fix. Don't go to a practitioner who just dabbles in NAET > or Bioset; find someone who really studies it. Lifestyle changes must also > be made. The sicker one is, the more complex MCS is to treat. The sickest > MCS person I personally know has become pretty " normal " with one of these > techniques. > A Bioset practitioner who sells the vials to NAET and Bioset practitioners > (Ergopathics), states that he finds chemicals are as easy to clear as foods > are. > RE: food reactions > Yes, SOMETIMES a reaction is to the chemicals (pesticides, etc.) on the food > rather than the food itself. I was sensitive to corn itself and reacted > severely to both organic and nonorganic corn. However, before treatments, I > reacted only to nonorganic potatoes (which have pesticides and also a > chemical to keep them from sprouting). I can now eat all potatoes but eat > organic at home. > I will respond to questions about NAET offlist as time allows. > There are inexpensive, do-it-yourself energy techniques that good NAET and > Bioset practitioners tell me work, but I prefer to stick with what I know. > Our family is now ordering our own vials and treating ourselves (or using > the actual food, chemical, etc.) For self-treatment: Check into TAT > (www.tat-intl.com/aboutTAT.htm or EFT (www.emofree.com). Yes, this is weird > stuff and you must be very motivated. I really don't care how weird it is > because I'm getting well while others are telling me this stuff can't work! > : ) My apologies for this long post. But if I were cured from cancer and > you had cancer, you'd want to know my experience. So I know from your > personal e-mails that many of you are interested in being cured of your MCS. > Good luck. And if you aren't ready to try this stuff this year, that's ok. > Next year, there will be an even easier way to clear allergies as these > treatments evolve. > , Minn. > > > > > > > > FAIR USE NOTICE: > > This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 16, 2004 Report Share Posted June 16, 2004 AH ... I HAVE THE BOOK READ IT AND TRIED it... Next complaint! Angel On Wed, 16 Jun 2004, M. wrote: > Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 11:23:27 -0500 > From: M. <julie@...> > Reply- > > Subject: [] treatment called NAET > > I feel discussing Nambudripad Allergy Elimination Technique (NAET) is > somewhat off-topic for this listserve. But I'm having a hard time not > responding when people who know little about the subject are criticizing a > treatment I have read numerous books about, talked with numerous > practitioners about, and personally experienced success with for more than > five years from three practitioners. I do understand your skepticism because > I just blew it off when I first heard about these treatments; after all, I > wrote about chemical sensitivities and treatments for The Human Ecologist > (Human Ecology Action League pub) and thought I knew the best ways of > coping. : ) > Please read a book about NAET or Bioset or if you are interested in others' > success stories about NAET, go to > > http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/CGI/wa.exe > and join the NAET listserve. The listsowner was bedridden for several years > and could only eat 6 foods before she had NAET. > I have done many other things to deal with chemical sensitivities (1987 > onset) and serious food sensitivities. I live in a home with hot water heat > and no carpet, eat well, avoid many chemicals, etc. I've been to traditional > allergists (who offered little help except letters to my employers), > European-trained homeopaths, MD environmental medicine specialists, etc., > etc. I've gone on strict food rotation diets, etc., etc. The only thing that > has really, really made a difference is NAET and Bioset. I began treatments > about five years ago from an MD who used to be traditional MD. > Doris Rapp, MD, the allergist and best-selling author who has helped many > with chemical sensitivities through what used to be called " clinical > ecology, " favorably mentions these treatments in her newest book, Our Toxic > World; A Wake Up Call. > As with any new treatments, these are evolving and the success depends on > the patient and the practitioner and the practitioner's level of training. > This is not a quick fix. Don't go to a practitioner who just dabbles in NAET > or Bioset; find someone who really studies it. Lifestyle changes must also > be made. The sicker one is, the more complex MCS is to treat. The sickest > MCS person I personally know has become pretty " normal " with one of these > techniques. > A Bioset practitioner who sells the vials to NAET and Bioset practitioners > (Ergopathics), states that he finds chemicals are as easy to clear as foods > are. > RE: food reactions > Yes, SOMETIMES a reaction is to the chemicals (pesticides, etc.) on the food > rather than the food itself. I was sensitive to corn itself and reacted > severely to both organic and nonorganic corn. However, before treatments, I > reacted only to nonorganic potatoes (which have pesticides and also a > chemical to keep them from sprouting). I can now eat all potatoes but eat > organic at home. > I will respond to questions about NAET offlist as time allows. > There are inexpensive, do-it-yourself energy techniques that good NAET and > Bioset practitioners tell me work, but I prefer to stick with what I know. > Our family is now ordering our own vials and treating ourselves (or using > the actual food, chemical, etc.) For self-treatment: Check into TAT > (www.tat-intl.com/aboutTAT.htm or EFT (www.emofree.com). Yes, this is weird > stuff and you must be very motivated. I really don't care how weird it is > because I'm getting well while others are telling me this stuff can't work! > : ) My apologies for this long post. But if I were cured from cancer and > you had cancer, you'd want to know my experience. So I know from your > personal e-mails that many of you are interested in being cured of your MCS. > Good luck. And if you aren't ready to try this stuff this year, that's ok. > Next year, there will be an even easier way to clear allergies as these > treatments evolve. > , Minn. > > > > > > > > FAIR USE NOTICE: > > This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.