Guest guest Posted June 16, 2004 Report Share Posted June 16, 2004 I feel discussing Nambudripad Allergy Elimination Technique (NAET) is somewhat off-topic for this listserve. But I'm having a hard time not responding when people who know little about the subject are criticizing a treatment I have read numerous books about, talked with numerous practitioners about, and personally experienced success with for more than five years from three practitioners. I do understand your skepticism because I just blew it off when I first heard about these treatments; after all, I wrote about chemical sensitivities and treatments for The Human Ecologist (Human Ecology Action League pub) and thought I knew the best ways of coping. : ) Please read a book about NAET or Bioset or if you are interested in others' success stories about NAET, go to http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/CGI/wa.exe and join the NAET listserve. The listsowner was bedridden for several years and could only eat 6 foods before she had NAET. I have done many other things to deal with chemical sensitivities (1987 onset) and serious food sensitivities. I live in a home with hot water heat and no carpet, eat well, avoid many chemicals, etc. I've been to traditional allergists (who offered little help except letters to my employers), European-trained homeopaths, MD environmental medicine specialists, etc., etc. I've gone on strict food rotation diets, etc., etc. The only thing that has really, really made a difference is NAET and Bioset. I began treatments about five years ago from an MD who used to be traditional MD. Doris Rapp, MD, the allergist and best-selling author who has helped many with chemical sensitivities through what used to be called " clinical ecology, " favorably mentions these treatments in her newest book, Our Toxic World; A Wake Up Call. As with any new treatments, these are evolving and the success depends on the patient and the practitioner and the practitioner's level of training. This is not a quick fix. Don't go to a practitioner who just dabbles in NAET or Bioset; find someone who really studies it. Lifestyle changes must also be made. The sicker one is, the more complex MCS is to treat. The sickest MCS person I personally know has become pretty " normal " with one of these techniques. A Bioset practitioner who sells the vials to NAET and Bioset practitioners (Ergopathics), states that he finds chemicals are as easy to clear as foods are. RE: food reactions Yes, SOMETIMES a reaction is to the chemicals (pesticides, etc.) on the food rather than the food itself. I was sensitive to corn itself and reacted severely to both organic and nonorganic corn. However, before treatments, I reacted only to nonorganic potatoes (which have pesticides and also a chemical to keep them from sprouting). I can now eat all potatoes but eat organic at home. I will respond to questions about NAET offlist as time allows. There are inexpensive, do-it-yourself energy techniques that good NAET and Bioset practitioners tell me work, but I prefer to stick with what I know. Our family is now ordering our own vials and treating ourselves (or using the actual food, chemical, etc.) For self-treatment: Check into TAT (www.tat-intl.com/aboutTAT.htm or EFT (www.emofree.com). Yes, this is weird stuff and you must be very motivated. I really don't care how weird it is because I'm getting well while others are telling me this stuff can't work! : ) My apologies for this long post. But if I were cured from cancer and you had cancer, you'd want to know my experience. So I know from your personal e-mails that many of you are interested in being cured of your MCS. Good luck. And if you aren't ready to try this stuff this year, that's ok. Next year, there will be an even easier way to clear allergies as these treatments evolve. , Minn. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.