Guest guest Posted November 13, 2004 Report Share Posted November 13, 2004 Harvard Post Harvard, Massachusetts Teachers move mold off the back burner By Moberly Friday, November 12, 2004 After years of discussion and considerable documentation, the debate about solving the mold problem in the Harvard Elementary School's kindergarten wing is moving off the back burner and into the community. The issue has faded in and out of prominence over the years as other projects have taken the limelight but now appears poised to rise to the top of the town's agenda. A recent report by Environmental Health, Inc. has prompted renewed interest in the problem and the best way to solve it. The report, issued by Terrell of Environmental Health of Hollis, N.H., was conducted at the behest of the Harvard Teacher's Association. According to President Diane Temple, HTA received a $4,000 grant from the Massachusetts Teacher's Association to retain an independent environmental consultant to review data gathered throughout the school by OccuHealth, Inc. of Mansfield. School Superintendent Mihran Keoseian retained OccuHealth in 2002 to test, measure and document indoor air quality at the elementary school in light of disagreeable odors, the long-standing presence of mold from roof leaks and anecdotal evidence of adverse health effects on some staff and students. Terrell reviewed the data and recommendations made by OccuHealth in February 2003 and presented his recommendations in a report dated Sept. 5. When asked why the HTA hired the environmental consultant, Temple said, " We have been concerned for the last four years that we had a sick building and that no one was doing enough to solve the problem. While the new wing of the high school was being constructed there was no thought to doing very much here, although I understand almost $140,000 has been spent on remediation efforts in the K wing. OccuHealth has done monitoring for the last three or four years and their reports indicated that we had a serious problem and it shouldn't be ignored. " We wanted to be the yeast on this issue, " she said. Causes The presence of active mold in wall cavities of the kindergarten wing is the result of water leakage compounded by time, according to the reports. Bad roof design is responsible for much of the leakage HES has experienced, Terrill said, something typical of the building's era. " Schools get maintenance that isn't on par with other buildings. If you owned a company you wouldn't let the roof leak for five years. But schools are always strapped for cash: They put wastebaskets under the leaks. " Bill Spacciapoli of the Harvard Board of Health agrees with this assessment. " There are ongoing problems that stem from design issues and maintenance issues at the school, " he said. These problems stem from the leaks and associated water build-up in many of the building's interior spaces and have led to active mold growth within wall cavities. In a report from February 2003, Hamilton, the Certified Industrial Hygienist from OHI, wrote, " The fungal growth, which likely resulted from chronic roof leaks and associated water filtration, is contained within the wall cavities but has not negatively impacted the air in the school rooms. " Mold growth contained within the wall cavities, however, is extraordinarily high, according to both the OHI report and the review of documents provided by Environmental Health. While counts of mold spores below 20,000 counts per cubic meter are considered normal, their report said, OHI tests found levels of pathogenic mold spores numbering in the millions within several wall cavities. But continuous quarterly testing of the indoor air quality at the school has never shown abnormal levels of mold, indicating that the spores have not breached the walls. In a phone interview Nov. 3, Hamilton said, " As of this date, testing has not shown that mold in the walls is affecting the air. " Remediation Although testing has not shown unacceptable levels of mold in the indoor air, the Board of Health has recommended a number of remedial steps in an effort to improve indoor air quality. When asked why they issued orders in the absence of data indicating problems, Bill Spacciapoli said, " We remediate things based on recommendations put out by the DEP and the EPA and are supported by the CDC, which really say you have to look at maintenance issues because there's really no good way to establish an acceptable level of mold. So you really have to fall back on what are " good practices' for caring for the facility. " Some of these practices have included pressurizing the crawl space in the kindergarten wing to keep moist air from coming up through the floor, sealing off the boiler room from the rest of the building and recommending the replacement of some of the carpeting. Spacciapoli said that he believes these steps have improved the conditions at the school, and said " It was much worse. Are we where we want to be? Absolutely not. But we're headed in the right direction. " To date, almost $140,000 has been spent on remediation in the wing, according to Keoseian. This phased approach to remediation has generated some concern that money is being spent on " Band-Aids, " and does not represent a comprehensive solution to the problem. Nor has it satisfied many of those concerned with the possible health effects mold can have on human health. Continued next week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.