Guest guest Posted January 2, 2005 Report Share Posted January 2, 2005 I'm an Army veteran, and I was taught the importance of " knowing your enemy " and turning a weakness into a strength with strategy, if at all possible. I identified my intense reactivity to mold and asked doctors to help me study the problem and deal with it - All refused. So I took a sample of the offending irritant to a " safe place " and tried sleeping in gradually increasing proximity to determine the most subtle signs of a respons that I could discern. Much to my amazement, the initial and earliest sign of any shift in my symptoms was a relative shift in " depression " , the sensation that I am constantly assured is " the product of an undisciplined mind to emotional stimulus " . This response occurred as a precursor to headaches, rash or any of the neurological symptoms that people normally associate with a " mold hit " . This was such a consistent response that I came to the conclusion that depression is not what psychiatrists think it is; It is a warning. When I thought about it for a while, it seemed logical that if Nature wanted to devise a mental response that would induce a creature to change its habits or location to avoid an immunological irritant by leaving an area, what " emotional " stimulus would serve better than " anxiety " and " depression " ? Our senses that interface with our tactile environment are exquisitely designed to correlate with our need to interpret damage and act accordingly, but what about toxic exposures? It seemed logical to me that an immunological message of dysfunction caused by toxins would create a commensurate impulse to " run like Hell " or at least try to change an animals circumstances in some manner to alter the exposure. It seemed to me that if my proximity to a toxic irritant consistently resulted in an " anxiety/depresion " response, that this was actually a useful warning instead of the " emotional response of a disordered mental state " . So I set out to devise a strategy of extreme mycotoxin avoidance based on my perception of exposure. I have many clues for overt responses and " mold slams " . But the primary sense that I am using to detect the lowest level of exposure is the " depression response " . Several years ago I was describing my strategy to a doctor who offered me antidepressents. I was stunned and amazed that despite my description of the rationale for my strategy, that I was still so misunderstood. " What? Take antidepressents and and blunt my most useful tool for detection of immunological upregulation? I don't want to deprive myself of the depression response - I rely on it and have learned to turn this so called " weakness " into a strength " . Despite the demonstrable immunological effects of mycotoxins, my descriptions of this strategy to doctors and psychiatrists results in a proposal of " Obsessive Avoidance Behaviors " to account for my actions. This " psychologizing " of a demonstrable, reproducible and provable response to known neurotoxins says more about the obsessions of psychiatrists than it does about my " behaviors " and I sincerely hope that someday these psychiatric-obsessive theorists will get the counseling they so desperately need. The evidence is building that " depression " is sickness behavior and represents " The Sixth Sense " , a perception of immunological response which, if correlated with infections or toxic irritants, can be an extremely useful indicator of a cytokine induced inflammatory condition. http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/eletters/329/7457/112-b#69034 - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.