Re: new member---headaches?

[Guest guest]

You all need to get back on the topic I origionally started. I asked about

headaches and you all are arguing about whatever!!! Someone posted about the

showers in Australia and one of you asked--what r u talking about. He was

talking about the orginional topic at hand. You all need to start your own

thread and stop posting on my--new member--headaches?--thread. Please!!! I'm

reading all you all's crap and it has nothing to do with headaches.

---------------------------------

Need a quick answer? Get one in minutes from people who know. Ask your question

on Answers.

[Guest guest]

experience. any further explination would cause much

controversy and it's not worth it. just drop it and

respect me and my reasons as is and I'll respect

yours.

ak

--- Barbara <bjarrett@...> wrote:

> Says who? Please, give me sources for what you're

> saying. Are you simply repeating something you've

> been told by a friend? Or is this something that you

> know for a fact? Is this something you believe

> because of superstition? It always puzzles me when

> people dismiss things seemingly out of hand. I'm

> genuinely curious as to why you think this.

>

> Barbara

>

>

>

>

> > > Re: new member---headaches?

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > I did go back to the doc and told him

> about

> > the

> > > headaches. That's why he gave me the Adivan.

> I

>

=== message truncated ===

[Guest guest]

i agree

ak

--- cam <prettypugz@...> wrote:

> You all need to get back on the topic I origionally

> started. I asked about headaches and you all are

> arguing about whatever!!! Someone posted about the

> showers in Australia and one of you asked--what r u

> talking about. He was talking about the orginional

> topic at hand. You all need to start your own

> thread and stop posting on my--new

> member--headaches?--thread. Please!!! I'm reading

> all you all's crap and it has nothing to do with

> headaches.

>

> ---------------------------------

> Need a quick answer? Get one in minutes from people

> who know. Ask your question on Answers.

>

> [Non-text portions of this message have been

> removed]

>

>

[Guest guest]

I had quite a few headaches for the first few weeks I was on it. They gradually

went away.

cam <prettypugz@...> wrote: You all need to get back on the topic

I origionally started. I asked about headaches and you all are arguing about

whatever!!! Someone posted about the showers in Australia and one of you

asked--what r u talking about. He was talking about the orginional topic at

hand. You all need to start your own thread and stop posting on my--new

member--headaches?--thread. Please!!! I'm reading all you all's crap and it has

nothing to do with headaches.

---------------------------------

Need a quick answer? Get one in minutes from people who know. Ask your question

on Answers.

[Guest guest]

The suggestion of hypnosis was a response. As was trying a hot shower and other

suggestions posted by other members to help with headaches.

Also, if you'd like more info about headaches as a side effect there are a

couple of things you can do: See the links page for the link to the information

on Lex which will list all noted sides. Then try searching the message archive

for the word headache.

One thing you have to understand about these drugs is that each of us has a

different response. You may have headaches and they may or may not be a

temporary side effect for you. From your post it seems headaches run in your

family. I would say that the Lex might be making them worse and the only

solution is to talk to your doctor and see about trying a different med. The

older AD's, one of them in particular - Pamelor (sp?) - has the added side

effect of getting rid of and preventing migraines for alot of people.

Barbara

Re: new member---headaches?

You all need to get back on the topic I origionally started. I asked about

headaches and you all are arguing about whatever!!! Someone posted about the

showers in Australia and one of you asked--what r u talking about. He was

talking about the orginional topic at hand. You all need to start your own

thread and stop posting on my--new member--headaches?--thread. Please!!! I'm

reading all you all's crap and it has nothing to do with headaches.

---------------------------------

Need a quick answer? Get one in minutes from people who know. Ask your

question on Answers.

[Guest guest]

I'm sure most of this is above board but there are doctors who put a

patient under hypnosis and take advantage of them like Polk claims

her husband did to her as a young girl. He was married and much older.

She was convicted of his murder.

Vicki

[Guest guest]

The same thing has been found true of medical doctors who are not hypnotists.

It's the fault of the man, not of the modality of medicine. There are lots of

ministers and priests who are guilty of these things too.

Colleen

vicki2005@... wrote:

I'm sure most of this is above board but there are doctors who put a

patient under hypnosis and take advantage of them like Polk claims

her husband did to her as a young girl. He was married and much older.

She was convicted of his murder.

Vicki

[Guest guest]

look, this is far off the track of Lex. let it go. we

are on different sides of this and probably always

will be so just LET IT GO. I can give you Bible stuff

against it but that too would be off the track. LET IT

GO.

ak

--- MsTigerHawk <tigerhawksoars@...> wrote:

> The same thing has been found true of medical

> doctors who are not hypnotists. It's the fault of

> the man, not of the modality of medicine. There are

> lots of ministers and priests who are guilty of

> these things too.

>

> Colleen

>

>

> vicki2005@... wrote:

> I'm sure most of this is above board but there are

> doctors who put a

> patient under hypnosis and take advantage of them

> like Polk claims

> her husband did to her as a young girl. He was

> married and much older.

> She was convicted of his murder.

>

> Vicki

>

>

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Oh, are we not discussing medical treatments for depression anymore on this

board? I did not know that.

Colleen

AUDREY KOEPKE <audkoe@...> wrote:

look, this is far off the track of Lex. let it go. we

are on different sides of this and probably always

will be so just LET IT GO. I can give you Bible stuff

against it but that too would be off the track. LET IT

GO.

ak

--- MsTigerHawk wrote:

> The same thing has been found true of medical

> doctors who are not hypnotists. It's the fault of

> the man, not of the modality of medicine. There are

> lots of ministers and priests who are guilty of

> these things too.

>

> Colleen

>

>

> vicki2005@... wrote:

> I'm sure most of this is above board but there are

> doctors who put a

> patient under hypnosis and take advantage of them

> like Polk claims

> her husband did to her as a young girl. He was

> married and much older.

> She was convicted of his murder.

>

> Vicki

>

>

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

She wasn't replying to your post, Audrey.

Barbara

Re: Re: new member---headaches?

look, this is far off the track of Lex. let it go. we

are on different sides of this and probably always

will be so just LET IT GO. I can give you Bible stuff

against it but that too would be off the track. LET IT

GO.

ak

--- MsTigerHawk <tigerhawksoars@...> wrote:

> The same thing has been found true of medical

> doctors who are not hypnotists. It's the fault of

> the man, not of the modality of medicine. There are

> lots of ministers and priests who are guilty of

> these things too.

>

> Colleen

>

>

> vicki2005@... wrote:

> I'm sure most of this is above board but there are

> doctors who put a

> patient under hypnosis and take advantage of them

> like Polk claims

> her husband did to her as a young girl. He was

> married and much older.

> She was convicted of his murder.

>

> Vicki

>

>

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

I'm well aware of preachers being charlatans...and the same in every profession.

The local married precher dated my aunt for years, then another woman I knew of.

He also tried to molest her daughter of around 10. She is now on Effexor, too.

Vicki

> I'm sure most of this is above board but there are doctors who put a

> patient under hypnosis and take advantage of them like Polk claims

> her husband did to her as a young girl. He was married and much older.

> She was convicted of his murder.

>

> Vicki

>

>

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Yes, you're right, these kind of men are everywhere.

Colleen

c0lts4ever <vicki2005@...> wrote:

I'm well aware of preachers being charlatans...and the same in every

profession.

The local married precher dated my aunt for years, then another woman I knew of.

He also tried to molest her daughter of around 10. She is now on Effexor, too.

Vicki

> I'm sure most of this is above board but there are doctors who put a

> patient under hypnosis and take advantage of them like Polk claims

> her husband did to her as a young girl. He was married and much older.

> She was convicted of his murder.

>

> Vicki

>

>

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

hypno. IS NOT MEDICAL DUH!

--- MsTigerHawk <tigerhawksoars@...> wrote:

> Oh, are we not discussing medical treatments for

> depression anymore on this board? I did not know

> that.

>

> Colleen

>

>

> AUDREY KOEPKE <audkoe@...> wrote:

> look, this is far off the track of Lex. let it go.

> we

> are on different sides of this and probably always

> will be so just LET IT GO. I can give you Bible

> stuff

> against it but that too would be off the track. LET

> IT

> GO.

> ak

> --- MsTigerHawk wrote:

>

> > The same thing has been found true of medical

> > doctors who are not hypnotists. It's the fault of

> > the man, not of the modality of medicine. There

> are

> > lots of ministers and priests who are guilty of

> > these things too.

> >

> > Colleen

> >

> >

> > vicki2005@... wrote:

> > I'm sure most of this is above board but there are

> > doctors who put a

> > patient under hypnosis and take advantage of them

> > like Polk claims

> > her husband did to her as a young girl. He was

> > married and much older.

> > She was convicted of his murder.

> >

> > Vicki

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

[Guest guest]

Excusez-moi, s'il vous plait, but clinical hypnotism is indeed medical. You have

to have an advanced degree to practice clinical hypnosis. I suggest you educate

yourself on the subject before you start throwing your " duhs " around. It comes

back to you. Perhaps you might look at the following website for a brief

education in what hypnosis is and what it is not.

http://www.asch.net/

http://www.athealth.com/Consumer/farticles/Pearson.html

http://www.a2zpsychology.com/articles/hypnotism.htm

And here's some websites telling about how clinical hypnosis can treat

depression.

http://www.depression-hypnosis.com/

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=8945

Colleen

AUDREY KOEPKE <audkoe@...> wrote:

hypno. IS NOT MEDICAL DUH!

--- MsTigerHawk wrote:

> Oh, are we not discussing medical treatments for

> depression anymore on this board? I did not know

> that.

>

> Colleen

>

>

> AUDREY KOEPKE wrote:

> look, this is far off the track of Lex. let it go.

> we

> are on different sides of this and probably always

> will be so just LET IT GO. I can give you Bible

> stuff

> against it but that too would be off the track. LET

> IT

> GO.

> ak

> --- MsTigerHawk wrote:

>

> > The same thing has been found true of medical

> > doctors who are not hypnotists. It's the fault of

> > the man, not of the modality of medicine. There

> are

> > lots of ministers and priests who are guilty of

> > these things too.

> >

> > Colleen

> >

> >

> > vicki2005@... wrote:

> > I'm sure most of this is above board but there are

> > doctors who put a

> > patient under hypnosis and take advantage of them

> > like Polk claims

> > her husband did to her as a young girl. He was

> > married and much older.

> > She was convicted of his murder.

> >

> > Vicki

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >