Guest guest Posted August 11, 2011 Report Share Posted August 11, 2011 Dana, audiologist resistance to loop demonstration and education is a commercial one. It is easy to convince yourself that Bluetooth is the new and the best answer for better hearing when you earn commissions selling it and none from telecoils. This is our real problem. I have been in sales and know from experience that a sales person must first convince him or herself that his product is the best. It is a truism in sales that one must first believe in one’s product. If a sales person does not believe in his product, he/she will find it difficult to convince others. In business, it is a rare person that can truthfully place the consumer’s best interest above his own profit and income. I know some fine, caring, and honest professional audiologist who have worked hard and spent 8 years in college, but they must also make a living. The system is all wrong for the medical profession and for our best interest but I do not know how to change it. Can you imagine a medical doctor selling medical supplies or equipment in his office? I met one several years ago and couldn’t get out of his office fast enough. E Pettey : Dana Mulvany Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 10:50 AM Loops_and_Telecoils Subject: Re: [Loops_and_Telecoils] Bluetooth and Hearing Loops It's strange to hear that those audiologists see no need for a loop if they're using Bluetooth, which would connect with only one person's Bluetooth equipment at a time. If the Bluetooth receiver is using a neckoop or silhouette inductor to couple with people's hearing aids, then the audio loop would need to be turned off at least temporarily in order to experience just the effect of the Bluetooth. Otherwise, if the Bluetooth is using direct audio input or streamers with NFMI, there shouldn't be a conflict. Dana On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Assist2Hear <lhansen@...> wrote: Hi All, I have a couple of audiology offices that say they have Bluetooth in their waiting rooms so they don't need a loop. I hope to convince them that both are worthwhile. But if they have Bluetooth hooked up to the TV in the waiting room, does that signal inferfere with the loop signal? I want to make sure before I approach them about doing both. Thanks, Hansen Assist 2 Hear ------------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 11, 2011 Report Share Posted August 11, 2011 Please do *not* cross post from other groups. It can create problems no one wants. Thanks. Quote of the nanosecond... Classified Ad: Christmas tag-sale. Handmade gifts for the hard-to-find person. & Dreamer Doll ke7nwn E-mail- Gone.to.Dawgs@... Home Page- http://webpages.charter.net/dog_guide/ Re: [Loops_and_Telecoils] Bluetooth and Hearing Loops It's strange to hear that those audiologists see no need for a loop if they're using Bluetooth, which would connect with only one person's Bluetooth equipment at a time. If the Bluetooth receiver is using a neckoop or silhouette inductor to couple with people's hearing aids, then the audio loop would need to be turned off at least temporarily in order to experience just the effect of the Bluetooth. Otherwise, if the Bluetooth is using direct audio input or streamers with NFMI, there shouldn't be a conflict. Dana On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Assist2Hear <lhansen@...> wrote: Hi All, I have a couple of audiology offices that say they have Bluetooth in their waiting rooms so they don't need a loop. I hope to convince them that both are worthwhile. But if they have Bluetooth hooked up to the TV in the waiting room, does that signal inferfere with the loop signal? I want to make sure before I approach them about doing both. Thanks, Hansen Assist 2 Hear ------------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.