Guest guest Posted January 29, 2004 Report Share Posted January 29, 2004 ANOTHER GOOD ARTICLE BUT STILL NOT THE ORIGINAL, HELP PLEASE, STILL LOOKING THROUGH ARCIVES, LOVE MICHELLE --- In , " Dave & Patty " <fdp3@c...> wrote: ----- Original Message ----- From: Zuckerman ifriends@c... Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 7:29 PM Subject: note re implants and the FDA Dear Friends, This is just a quick note to thank all of you for all your efforts. It shouldn't be so shocking that the FDA did not approve a product that was not proven safe, especially after hearing so many heartrending stories of women's health disasters. But a lot of people were very surprised. I always knew that the truth would be powerful. But we all know that it wasn't easy to get some people to listen. The FDA's decision to reject Inamed's application for approval for silicone gel breast implants is an enormous victory for those of you who worked so hard to inform the FDA about the many women who have been harmed by implants. It is an even bigger victory that the FDA has developed new guidelines about the kinds of research that implant makers need to do to prove that any breast implants, regardless of the " filler, " are safe. What will happen next? It is my understanding that the Inamed PMA application for approval is now officially dead and that Mentor acknowledged that their submission of approval for silicone gel breast implants (made 3 weeks ago) would not satisfy the new requirements either. I can't predict the future, but it seems unlikely that the FDA will consider approval of any silicone gel implants anytime this year, and even next year seems unlikely. I think it more likely that the next application will be for the " new, more cohesive gel implants " but any companies making them will presumably need at least a few years to gather data before they can be considered by the FDA. Meanwhile, silicone gel breast implants will continue to be available to many breast cancer patients (or women with deformities) and many women with broken silicone gel implants. Silicone gel breast implants should be unavailable to the vast majority of first-time augmentation patients. If you hear that plastic surgeons are not abiding by these restrictions, please let us know. Yesterday, the FDA has asked the public for comments on their new guidance for the research needed to prove that any breast implant (whatever its made of) is safe. See http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/2004/NEW01003.html for more information. Let's work together to provide good information to the FDA, and to continue to educate women and doctors, so that women will have the information they need to make the decisions that are best for them -- whether they are considering implants, or considering having their implants removed. I hope that in a week or so our website will provide an analysis of the new FDA guidance, and some samples of comments submitted to the FDA. Meantime, I hope you'll all feel good to know that the FDA heard your concerns and as a result, many women will avoid the implant problems that so many of you have experienced. Best wishes, Zuckerman, Ph.D. President National Center for Policy Research for Women & Families 1901 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 901 Washington, DC 20006 202 223-4000 www.center4policy.org Support CPR through the United Way or CFC #9884! --- End forwarded message --- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.