Guest guest Posted February 12, 2004 Report Share Posted February 12, 2004 ----- Original Message ----- From: " ilena rose " <ilena2000@...> <dz@...> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 6:59 PM Subject: MSNBC: Seeking better breast implants > (see photos on page) > > Seeking better breast implants > Doctors experiment with 'gummy bear' > fillers, titanium coatings > Cohesive silicone gel implants, such as this one made by McGhan, a division > of Inamed, are designed to avoid leaks. > By Mann > MSNBC contributor > > http://msnbc.msn.com/id/3972625/ > > Updated: 6:50 p.m. ET Feb. 11, 2004Many women hoping for a more > natural-looking alternative to saline breast implants were disappointed by > the Food and Drug Administration's recent decision to maintain the ban on > silicone-gel-filled implants. But there may be other options on the market > one day, as doctors continue their quest to find better ways to boost a > woman's bosom. > > advertisement > > > Costa Rica > > Select your Education > > Select your Job > > > Among the most promising developments, they say, are cohesive silicone gel, > leak-resistant implants with the consistency of a gummy bear and a new type > of implant shell coating that may be less likely to cause inflammation and > scarring in the surrounding breast tissue. > > " I think we are getting closer to developing the perfect implant, in terms > of durability, biocompatibility and natural shape, " says Dr. Mark Jewell, a > plastic surgeon in Eugene, Ore., and vice president of the American Society > for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. > > Safety concerns linking ruptures of the silicone gel implants to autoimmune > problems in some women caused the FDA to ban the sale of the implants in > 1992, except for use in clinical trials and by women undergoing breast > reconstruction. While the implants were somewhat exonerated by an Institute > of Medicine report saying they do not up the risk of autoimmune disease, the > new FDA ban calls for more study before they can be put back on the market. > > 'I think we are getting closer to developing the perfect implant, in terms > of durability, biocompatibility and natural shape.' > > > - Dr. Mark Jewell > American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery > > > Both saline- and silicone-filled implants have a silicone shell. But if the > saline implants leak, deflate or rupture, which they often do, they would > release only salt water -- not silicone -- into the body. The downside of > the saline implants, though, is that they don't look and feel as natural as > the others. > > " Some people are concerned about the safety of silicone gel and many people > are disappointed about the performance of saline implants, notably that they > are associated with more ripples, have a more liquid feel and don't look as > natural as the silicone implants, " says Dr. Grant s, medical director > of Marina Plastic Surgery Associates, with locations in Marina Del Rey and > Palos Verdes, Calif. > > 'Gummies' > Enter cohesive gel implants, which are currently on the market in Europe and > Brazil, and now being studied in the United States. > > " The 'gummy bear' implants have the positive attributes of the silicone gel, > but lack the concerns of gel migration, " says s, who is one of 15 U.S. > doctors participating in a study of Silimed cohesive gel implants. > > Dr. P. , Jr., agrees. " The gel doesn't migrate, so there are > potential safety benefits because if the shell should fail, the gel will not > go anywhere -- it would just stay in one place, " says , an associate > professor of plastic surgery at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical > Center in Dallas. > > And unlike saline implants, s notes, " cohesive gel implants feel like > breast tissue, not a water balloon. " > > So far, he adds, the data and patient response are " overwhelmingly > positive. " > > INTERACTIVE > > > . Key events in the quest for a bigger bust line. > > > > Last October, 42-year-old Charlie Sheridan, who works in s' office, > traded in her saline implants for a pair of cohesive gel implants as part of > the clinical trial. > > " I am sporting a pair of gummies, " Sheridan says. " They have the look and > feel of silicone, but don't have the hardness or lack of naturalness of > saline and there is no worry of deflation, " she says. One of her saline > implants did, in fact, deflate which is why she opted for the newer model. > > The companies Inamed and Mentor also are conducting studies of their > versions of the cohesive gel implants. > > Experts in the field say it could be at least three to five years before any > such product is on the U.S. market, provided the FDA approves one. > > But not all plastic surgeons are completely sold on these new implants. > > " The problem is density, " says Dr. Lawrence , a New York City plastic > surgeon. " They may have value in reconstructive procedures because you need > density and mass, but for normal women, they are too dense, " he says. > > " Cohesive gel is a refinement of the current silicone implant, but it's > harder than usual silicone gel, so it's not the total answer, " agrees Dr. > Rod J. Rohrich, president of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and > the chairman of the department of plastic surgery at the University of Texas > Southwestern Medical Center. > > Another product in the pipeline, he notes, is an implant filler made with a > substance called polyethylene glycol. > > " It contains a patented blend of polyethylene glycol and saline and results > in an implant that has the look and feel of silicone, " says Rohrich, who > helped develop the substance. > > Hopes for indestructible implants > Titanium-coated breast implants may also be an option in the future. The > product of a partnership between Poly Implants Prostheses, a French company > specializing in implants, and GfE, a German aerospace company, Tibreeze > implants are coated with a thin layer of titanium and filled with silicone > gel. > > " It's not like you dip it in molten titanium, it's a thin coating that bonds > to the silicone, " Jewell explains. > > > Wong / Getty Images > During a hearing last October of an FDA advisory panel considering the > return of silicone gel implants, Hiemstra and Beth Nichols of the > National Center for Policy Research for Women & Families hold post-surgical > photos of breasts with removed silicone implants. > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ > > " Titanium is a more biocompatible metal than even stainless steel, " he says, > meaning that it is less likely to cause a toxic or otherwise injurious > reactions in the body. > > Researchers are hopeful that by coating the shell, the implant will be more > resistant to infection, stronger and will produce less scarring and capsular > contracture, a condition that occurs when scar tissue forms around the > implant and results in painful stiffness of the breast and possible leakage > of the substance inside the implant. > > So far, Jewell says, three women have received the implants as part of a > clinical trial in Germany that began last year. > > " We don't know yet if it will have a durability advantage, " he adds. > > Lunch-time breast lifts? > Women can get lunch-time injections of Botox and various facial fillers, and > now researchers in Sweden may have found a way to boost a woman's breast > size during the lunch hour as well. > > In the near future, Rohrich says, injections of hyaluronic acid, a compound > used to fill fine lines and wrinkles, could be used to do temporary breast > enhancement. > > " It is a non-surgical procedure and can be used to build up breast tissue > and enhance the breast for a couple of years, " he says. > > Currently the injections are being performed as part of pilot studies in > Sweden by the manufacturer, Q-Med. Enhancements, however, are not permanent > and eventually the hyaluronic acid will be re-absorbed into the body. > > Peering into his crystal ball, Rohrich forecasted what else may be on the > distant horizon, including grow-your-own breast implants. > > " We may one day make our own implants from our own fat where surgeons > harvest fat via liposuction and stimulate it to grow, " Rohrich says, " so it > will be natural but to grow that amount of fat and grow it consistently may > be years and years away. " > > Mann is a health writer based in New York City. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.