Guest guest Posted July 2, 2007 Report Share Posted July 2, 2007 I have not visited the group site in some time. Suzanne_on_ca, I hope all is well with your sister or at least getting better. I have decided to have my gall bladder removed. I know my own personality and do not have the self discipline to maintain any kind of regimen using remedies, like olive oil and lemon morning and night, etc. I have had gall stones since before my daughter was born 2004. In fact I have ammenoreah, so I was unaware I was pregnant till my gall bladder symptoms sent me to my doctor in my 3-4th month of pregnancy. He did a pelvic exam in 09/2003 and did not diagnose me as pregnant. He referred me for a pelvic ultrasound and an abdominal ultrasound. Of course my HMO approved the abdominal ultrasound first. On the way to work after my ultrasound, I felt that " flutter " that most women will understand and I knew I wasn't " just sick " I was pregnant. Of course my doc's female staff seemed very flustered when I called knowing that I had just been in and he had done a pelvic and did not realize I was pregnant. The abdominal ultrasound was done the 1st week of October 2003. I'm sure his staff realized the doc messed up. Now I had gone 1 extra month without pre-natal care. They of course referred me to an ob/gyn the same day. I was never told what my abdominal ultrasound results were. I was totally pre-occupied with my pregnancy, and any other symptoms I had I attributed to the pregancy. It wasn't untill my daughter was at least 18 mos. old that I returned to my doctor because I was very sick with a bad cold and had made up my mind that if I needed to take antibiotics for bronchitis I was going to stop breatfeeding. During that office visit with my doc that he asked me what I was going to do about my gallstones. (Total Scooby-Doo moment----HUH?) I had no idea I had gallstones. I was o.k. except for the bad chest cold I went to see the doc for. Now, summer of 2007 I have terrible random pains. They were really bad on a road trip to Oklahoma during Easter Week. That is was helped me make my decision. Also I was having a problem reconciling all of the home remedies I had read about and my limited knowledge of anatomy and digestive system. How is it that taking anything internally is going to break down these stones and make them pass through your system and eliminated in a bowel movement. It made no sense. Now I am just waiting for my HMO to approve my surgery. Everyone has to make their own decisions about health. If taking remedies works for you and you have the discipline to follow through with it and believe they work for you then great. Right now, I have made my decision that having my gall stones removed is the best decision for me. Take care! Suzanne <suzanne_on_ca@...> wrote: Many of you may feel that stones are formed in the liver and will migrate down to the Gall bladder. It stands to reason that if the liver is not functioning properly, you will have more/worse formation of the stones. This in itself will lead to Gall Bladder attacks. My sister has gone the gammit, trying to solve her GB attacks - using diet, naturopathic herbs, chinese herbs, and now ursidol. She had even been told that she was " fixating " on her gallbladder and needed tranquilizers. Doctors said that to get rid of her problem, she needed to have the GB out. It is amzing at the scare tactics that were utilized in a large metropolis city of Canada! I'd tried to advise her, but could not tell her if it was or was not better for her to have the GB out - I can't see inside of her. BUT She had so many other symptoms unrelated to GB problems (as well as the terrible attacks) - weight loss, anemia, pains in unrelated areas and severe fatigue. To make a long story short, she has been tested by a blood specialist - results show that she has hemachromatosis. It attacks the liver causing cyrrosis. - probably the cause of her GB problems! This disease is not normally diagnosed. It is a separate test and must be ordered by the doctor. She still has her GB and, hopefully, is near the end of a more than 2 year journey of ill health. --------------------------------- Don't be flakey. Get for Mobile and always stay connected to friends. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 2, 2007 Report Share Posted July 2, 2007 Thank You Suzanne for this story - many people forget that the gallbladder is just that - a bladder that holds the bile until required by digestion - it is very passive and only causes problems when the bile that it stores is toxic or at the wrong pH. Removing the gallbladder never fixes the problem - it simply allows the original problem - the liver function - to continue and adds more stress on an already burdened disgestive system. --- In gallstones , " Suzanne " <suzanne_on_ca@...> wrote: > > Many of you may feel that stones are formed in the liver and will > migrate down to the Gall bladder. It stands to reason that if the > liver is not functioning properly, you will have more/worse formation > of the stones. This in itself will lead to Gall Bladder attacks. > > My sister has gone the gammit, trying to solve her GB attacks - using > diet, naturopathic herbs, chinese herbs, and now ursidol. She had > even been told that she was " fixating " on her gallbladder and needed > tranquilizers. Doctors said that to get rid of her problem, she > needed to have the GB out. It is amzing at the scare tactics that > were utilized in a large metropolis city of Canada! > > I'd tried to advise her, but could not tell her if it was or was not > better for her to have the GB out - I can't see inside of her. BUT > She had so many other symptoms unrelated to GB problems (as well as > the terrible attacks) - weight loss, anemia, pains in unrelated areas > and severe fatigue. > > To make a long story short, she has been tested by a blood specialist > - results show that she has hemachromatosis. It attacks the liver > causing cyrrosis. - probably the cause of her GB problems! This > disease is not normally diagnosed. It is a separate test and must be > ordered by the doctor. > > She still has her GB and, hopefully, is near the end of a more than 2 > year journey of ill health. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 2, 2007 Report Share Posted July 2, 2007 Hello , There are certain herbs that are supposed to help to disolve the stones. You can look into the links and files of this group for more info. There is also a drug prescribed by a medical dr. - ursidol, which will slowly help to disolve stones. Many Drs feel that once you're a stone maker, you will reform new ones after the initial ones are gone, hence few try the chemical route. In the past, Drs removed just the stones, but that is a bit more complicated than removal of the whole gallbladder. If you don't live in North America, perhaps they will only remove the stones - but I would quizz the Dr more to see the exact procedure being done. Remember - surgery is irreversible. Please study and be aware of all of the side effects of surgery on digestive system and health. You must be a working partner in your health to receive the best treatment. Suzanne >...How is it that taking anything internally is > going to break down these stones and make them pass through your > system and eliminated in a bowel movement. ....Right now, I have > made my decision that having my gall stones removed is the best > decision for me. > Take care! > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 3, 2007 Report Share Posted July 3, 2007 Wow, that was fabulous! Amber many people forget that the gallbladder is just that - a bladder that holds the bile until required by digestion - it is very passive and only causes problems when the bile that it stores is toxic or at the wrong pH. Removing the gallbladder never fixes the problem - it simply allows the original problem - the liver function - to continue and adds more stress on an already burdened disgestive system. . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 4, 2007 Report Share Posted July 4, 2007 Hello , Removing your gall bladder will not solve the whole problem. You have the problem because your diet is at fault. Unless you correct it you will still make the stones in the liver and will only have more problems than before. There are digestive problems you are not told about. http://www.gallbladderattack.com/gallbladdersurgery.shtml Read this web site on what people say about their after results of the surgery. It is important that you do your home work before deciding on something so drastic as surgerical removal of an organ. That is permanent. And here is one more I found also. After reading these then make your decision. But it is very important to be informed before making a decision that has permanent results. http://www.liverdoctor.com/Section4/gallbladder.asp Regards, > >...How is it that taking anything internally is > > going to break down these stones and make them pass through your > > system and eliminated in a bowel movement. ....Right now, I have > > made my decision that having my gall stones removed is the best > > decision for me. > > Take care! > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 16, 2007 Report Share Posted July 16, 2007 I am glad you sister was finally PROPERLY DIAGANOSED! It is so often that a person has many symptoms, and docotors go for the most common thing, instead of thinking of RARE DISEASES. It turns out I had a similar situation, but I wasn't going to let them take my gallbladder! Well, 10 years later I now have several diagnosis that explains the myriad of symptoms, and it turns out that they are RARE DISEASES!!! I don't mean to use so many " caps " to yell, but rather to emphasize that doctors have to do better when diagnosing, and people need to go with thier gut (no pun intended) to keep thier body whole. Thank God your sister was insistent on keeping her gallbladder long enough to find out what is really going on. --- In gallstones , " Suzanne " <suzanne_on_ca@...> wrote: > > Many of you may feel that stones are formed in the liver and will > migrate down to the Gall bladder. It stands to reason that if the > liver is not functioning properly, you will have more/worse formation > of the stones. This in itself will lead to Gall Bladder attacks. > > My sister has gone the gammit, trying to solve her GB attacks - using > diet, naturopathic herbs, chinese herbs, and now ursidol. She had > even been told that she was " fixating " on her gallbladder and needed > tranquilizers. Doctors said that to get rid of her problem, she > needed to have the GB out. It is amzing at the scare tactics that > were utilized in a large metropolis city of Canada! > > I'd tried to advise her, but could not tell her if it was or was not > better for her to have the GB out - I can't see inside of her. BUT > She had so many other symptoms unrelated to GB problems (as well as > the terrible attacks) - weight loss, anemia, pains in unrelated areas > and severe fatigue. > > To make a long story short, she has been tested by a blood specialist > - results show that she has hemachromatosis. It attacks the liver > causing cyrrosis. - probably the cause of her GB problems! This > disease is not normally diagnosed. It is a separate test and must be > ordered by the doctor. > > She still has her GB and, hopefully, is near the end of a more than 2 > year journey of ill health. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.