Guest guest Posted January 15, 2008 Report Share Posted January 15, 2008 Thanks Karima, That's interesting. I would like to know more about what you are doing since I assume it is working at least pretty well for you. Did you learn what your 'type' is form just a questionaire or where there any blood test or similar tests? Also are there a set number of possible 'types'? I took an interest in a 'body type' diet once - I think that there were supposed to be like 4 basic types. I am not really sure that that model worked well for me. I have to admit that one thing that I am interested in is keeping my supplement regime as simple as possible - I am flawed in such as way that if it is too complicated, it will likely often get skipped or fall by the way. I sort of figure that simple and doable is often better in my case than optimal but hard and complicated. I know some people have health issue that are not so forgiving and they need to do everything they can in the most optimal manner. It is nice to learn new thing and to find out what is working well for other people -- I tend to agree with your assertion that different people have fairly significant differences in their nutritional needs as well as their needs for micro-nutrients (supplements). It just seems so hard to sort the whole thing out! Thanks for the info and for responding to my question! Wishes for good health, August << There are different schools on B vitamin balance. Personally I now use the metabolic typing lens. Where some B¹s are emphasized over others dependingon what kind of metabolism you have. To get more information you can buy CD¹s from www.dr-gonzalez.com - Dr. is a NY practitioner who mainly specializes in cancer treatment, there are downloads of his lectures on the site. I find them intriguing, provocative, and powerfully convincing. There is a commercial website www.metabolictyping.com that uses a similar underlying idea. . . . . (Snip) I have been adapting my supplementation to this model but using the metabolic typing profile method . . . I used to take the normal balanced B vitamins, but had very bad reactions no matter what purity, or origin (nausea and even vomiting). This is a lifelong reaction. When I investigated this new model of nutrition, I understood why. It is because large doses of B¹s are not beneficial for my metabolic type, > even though they are for many others. Only some of them are useful and particularly some forms over others. For example, my type does better with Niacinamide over Niacin. This is not saying we don¹t need some of all of the B¹s, just that each persons balance will be different. This is highly uncommon thinking in the supplement area, it is hard to adapt > to the idea that there isn¹t a standardized formula that is the best, or > good for everyone. I always believed that until I started digging into this > model and found that there is lots of science to back it up. Practitioners > get it too, because almost all Dr¹s will say that their patients vary a > great deal. But it is now treated as this great mystery, with no science or > model to predict why or how this might be. > Karima>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.