Guest guest Posted April 19, 2008 Report Share Posted April 19, 2008 Here is a thought that came from a Pastor called " ph Prince " from New Creation Church in Singapore. He talked during one of his sermons on how it is scriptural to eat only two meals a day. Now in America we have been taught to eat three meals a day and sometimes at that, they are large meals. Pastor Prince, commented that the ones teaching this are the advertisers who are trying to get us to buy something. Be it large dishes or more food. He also made a really profound comment, which was that if we skip one meal we will not die. Now don't get condemned or offended if you eat more than two meals. As the Pastor was preaching on this, he was only encouraging that it could be good to eat only two meals a day. But if you want to eat 10 meals a day that is your choice, this was just something to think about. The pastor also mentioned that if you are sick, he has seen many people get better by just eating two meals a day. I just thought that this might be something to consider. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 20, 2008 Report Share Posted April 20, 2008 > He talked during one of his sermons > on how it is scriptural to eat only two meals a day. > > I just thought that this might be something to consider. > > That won't work for me. I have hypoglycemia and get terribly shaky, headachy, can't think or function if I don't eat a little something, frequently. I never had a large meal, however. I have not had an episode of hypoglycemia since I started eating that way. I think each person has to do what sounds right for them. Amber Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 20, 2008 Report Share Posted April 20, 2008 I would completely agree with what you said that everyone needs to do what they feel is right for their body and Pastor Prince would also agree. I was just submitting an idea. I myself also have been diagnosed with hyperglycemia. One thing you can do to help yourself with this is to eat brown rice. Rice acts as a stabilizer. I don't recall all the exact medical reasons why rice helps. I also know that I got a lot better when I got rid of my microwave. Research in European nations have shown that microwave ovens contaminates all food that goes in it with mild levels of radiation poisoning. It is not severe enough to kill but what it has been shown to do is weaken the immune system. Then there is the who change in me to stop using chemical drugs from doctors and such and turn to herbal medicine. There are also natural antibiotics out in the field. Then there is also chanca peidra which has mutiple applications including being refered to as the stone breaker. Besides all that there are other remedies for hypoglycemia which I just don't recall right now. Did you have to go through that aughful 8 hour blood sugar test? Yuck, except for that super sugar drink, which I gulped down. The nurses said we knew you was hypoglycemic just by the way I guzzled the drink. So I think it was rather rotten of them to keep drawing blood every hour. Anyways, if I remember more of what I did for the hypoglycemia I write some more. > > > > > > He talked during one of his sermons > > on how it is scriptural to eat only two meals a day. > > > I just thought that this might be something to consider. > > > > > > > That won't work for me. I have hypoglycemia and get terribly shaky, > headachy, can't think or function if I don't eat a little something, > frequently. I never had a large meal, however. I have not had an episode > of hypoglycemia since I started eating that way. I think each person has to > do what sounds right for them. > > Amber > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 21, 2008 Report Share Posted April 21, 2008 > I myself also have been diagnosed with hyperglycemia. One thing you can > do to help yourself with this is to eat brown rice.> My husband has type 2 diabetes and he can't eat any form of rice or it will raise his blood sugar. > Did you have to go through that aughful 8 hour blood sugar test?> It was not necessary in my case as my symptoms made it evident enough. Eating small amounts, frequently, totally solved the problem. I remember one day when I had not eaten for 7 hours, I was in a grocery store and suddenly didn't know why I was there and just wanted to sit down and cry. Amber Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 21, 2008 Report Share Posted April 21, 2008 I can't really think of an instance where eating twice a day would be good for anyone. Done over the long course, they would be likely to gain weight and develop blood sugar problems. Many nutritionists believe that weight control is all about calories in/calories out. But that is not so. It's more important how you take in the calories. There was a study done on rats. One group was given 3 large meals each day. The second group was given the same food, but spread out into smaller meals throughout the day. The first group became obese and the second group maintained their weight. This is because extreme blood sugar swings is what causes us to " collect fat " . Keeping it level by eating low-glycemic foods every 2-3 hours is not only healthier for hypo- or hyper- glycemics, it is healthier for people as a whole. Brown rice is a better choice than white rice, but it needs to be eaten in moderation. Fruits, veggies, and good fats/oils are much more important than brown rice. And diabetics should stay away from it. People who eat more animal fats can go longer without eating, which is perhaps what they ate twice a day? Evie > > I would completely agree with what you said that everyone needs to do > what they feel is right for their body and Pastor Prince would also > agree. I was just submitting an idea. > > I myself also have been diagnosed with hyperglycemia. One thing you > can do to help yourself with this is to eat brown rice. Rice acts as > a stabilizer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 21, 2008 Report Share Posted April 21, 2008 >I can't really think of an instance where eating twice a day would be > good for anyone. Done over the long course, they would be likely to > gain weight and develop blood sugar problems. > I totally agree. Every time a person eats something, it revs up the metabolism. Amber Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 21, 2008 Report Share Posted April 21, 2008 Well I have to say that I don't give much credit to any scientific studies even ones done by nutritionists in regards to what they say is good for you and what isn't. Every few years someone is always changing their mind about what is good and what isn't good. Besides this the question arises in my mind about what kind of food where they feeding these rates. Was it actually 100% organic or not. Was the food some kind of hybrid or was it real food - heirloom. Alot of what is really effect our bodies are all the toxins we are bombarded with. We are feed hybrid food which has %40 more sugars in it compared to natural food - heirloom. There has been some universities that have been doing studies on how pesticides on the food remain in trace amounts. And that these trace amounts are enough to adversely effect our health. The one thing I have not seen though is how are these poisons effect people who may have greater adverse response to these chemicals. There has also been some studies to show that these chemicals and toxins we are being exposed to are causing alot of the modern diseases we face. But unfortunately no one is doing large studies, so therefore when one university studies one aspect of pesticides the special interest groups come out and say we need more studies before we can identify this has bad. But no one does the study. So the public is mislead into thinking that there must not be anything wrong with our contaminated food. I also do not agree with the idea of eating rice in moderation because of oriental people who eat rice every day and they are healthier than americans. In the end please understand this is just my opinion and that I am for each person eating how they feel is right for them. Because despite western medicine every body is not the same. My father in law was a perfect example of this. A number of times when the doctors wanted to find his organs, in particular his gall bladder they could not find it. Some of his organs where not where their stereotypes said they should be. Also since I am a firm believer in the Bible I think that two meals a day is the best idealistic diet for humans. Since God made us, He would know best. But with what our modern food supply has become, that idealistic diet may not be possible due to a lack of nutrition. As for myself I will say that I am not nor do I believe in the vegetarian diet. I am for fruit and vegetables but I am also for meat. Not for the corn feed meat that is offered to us but I am still for eating meat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 I'm perplexed by your logic. First you say, " Well I have to say that I don't give much credit to any scientific studies even ones done by nutritionists in regards to what they say is good for you and what isn't. " Then you say, " I also do not agree with the idea of eating rice in moderation because of oriental people who eat rice every day and they are healthier than americans. " Do you believe in the scientific method at all? Your argument for the rat " study " on whether or not the food was organic is irrelevant. If both groups were fed the same exact food, it is a constant. The only difference was in how often they were fed. And I'm pretty certain that making a sweeping generalization about rice being the reason why Asians are healthier than Americans is a little off the mark. But I'm sure there is a study somewhere to answer that question. ;o) Evie > > Well I have to say that I don't give much credit to any scientific > studies even ones done by nutritionists in regards to what they say is > good for you and what isn't. Every few years someone is always > changing their mind about what is good and what isn't good. Besides > this the question arises in my mind about what kind of food where they > feeding these rates. Was it actually 100% organic or not. Was the > food some kind of hybrid or was it real food - heirloom. > > Alot of what is really effect our bodies are all the toxins we are > bombarded with. We are feed hybrid food which has %40 more sugars in > it compared to natural food - heirloom. There has been some > universities that have been doing studies on how pesticides on the > food remain in trace amounts. And that these trace amounts are enough > to adversely effect our health. The one thing I have not seen though > is how are these poisons effect people who may have greater adverse > response to these chemicals. > > There has also been some studies to show that these chemicals and > toxins we are being exposed to are causing alot of the modern diseases > we face. But unfortunately no one is doing large studies, so > therefore when one university studies one aspect of pesticides the > special interest groups come out and say we need more studies before > we can identify this has bad. But no one does the study. So the > public is mislead into thinking that there must not be anything wrong > with our contaminated food. > > I also do not agree with the idea of eating rice in moderation because > of oriental people who eat rice every day and they are healthier than > americans. > > In the end please understand this is just my opinion and that I am for > each person eating how they feel is right for them. Because despite > western medicine every body is not the same. My father in law was a > perfect example of this. A number of times when the doctors wanted to > find his organs, in particular his gall bladder they could not find > it. Some of his organs where not where their stereotypes said they > should be. > > Also since I am a firm believer in the Bible I think that two meals a > day is the best idealistic diet for humans. Since God made us, He > would know best. But with what our modern food supply has become, > that idealistic diet may not be possible due to a lack of nutrition. > > As for myself I will say that I am not nor do I believe in the > vegetarian diet. I am for fruit and vegetables but I am also for > meat. Not for the corn feed meat that is offered to us but I am still > for eating meat. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 You are right, that was to generalized and it was an error in logic. What do you know I am human after all. I agree if both test groups where feed the same food be it organic or not it could produce results in contrast between the two groups. About the rice, I did not say that rice was the reason that orientals are healthy. My point about rice is that since the orientals live heavily on rice without any apperant ill effects and they have done this for centuries. The idea that one must eat rice in moderation is not well founded. But again each person needs to eat as they feel comfortable. As to scientific research and why I don't give it much credence is due to many factors that are left out in the research process. But I don't have the time to go into details of all of that. Suffice it to say that scientific studies have been claims that some food is bad for you and then later decided that it is not. Scientific studies have bounced back and forth over what is good and what isn't. So what's up with that? Well it is their methods of research. > > > > Well I have to say that I don't give much credit to any scientific > > studies even ones done by nutritionists in regards to what they say > is > > good for you and what isn't. Every few years someone is always > > changing their mind about what is good and what isn't good. Besides > > this the question arises in my mind about what kind of food where > they > > feeding these rates. Was it actually 100% organic or not. Was the > > food some kind of hybrid or was it real food - heirloom. > > > > Alot of what is really effect our bodies are all the toxins we are > > bombarded with. We are feed hybrid food which has %40 more sugars > in > > it compared to natural food - heirloom. There has been some > > universities that have been doing studies on how pesticides on the > > food remain in trace amounts. And that these trace amounts are > enough > > to adversely effect our health. The one thing I have not seen > though > > is how are these poisons effect people who may have greater adverse > > response to these chemicals. > > > > There has also been some studies to show that these chemicals and > > toxins we are being exposed to are causing alot of the modern > diseases > > we face. But unfortunately no one is doing large studies, so > > therefore when one university studies one aspect of pesticides the > > special interest groups come out and say we need more studies before > > we can identify this has bad. But no one does the study. So the > > public is mislead into thinking that there must not be anything > wrong > > with our contaminated food. > > > > I also do not agree with the idea of eating rice in moderation > because > > of oriental people who eat rice every day and they are healthier > than > > americans. > > > > In the end please understand this is just my opinion and that I am > for > > each person eating how they feel is right for them. Because despite > > western medicine every body is not the same. My father in law was a > > perfect example of this. A number of times when the doctors wanted > to > > find his organs, in particular his gall bladder they could not find > > it. Some of his organs where not where their stereotypes said they > > should be. > > > > Also since I am a firm believer in the Bible I think that two meals > a > > day is the best idealistic diet for humans. Since God made us, He > > would know best. But with what our modern food supply has become, > > that idealistic diet may not be possible due to a lack of nutrition. > > > > As for myself I will say that I am not nor do I believe in the > > vegetarian diet. I am for fruit and vegetables but I am also for > > meat. Not for the corn feed meat that is offered to us but I am > still > > for eating meat. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.