Guest guest Posted July 1, 2002 Report Share Posted July 1, 2002 Hi all! I don't post too often, but would like to hear any experience anyone has on the following subject. I have CMT 1A, and am in my 4th month of pregnancy. I am not really looking forward to having a natural birth, because I'm not a big fan of pain, and I'm afraid that I will get too worn out to do anything else. However the pain alternatives (epidural, spinal, etc.) scare me since the little information I could find on the procedures on CMTers said these were not a good idea. I don't have a doctor that is familiar with CMT, as I was diagnosed by a Orthopedic surgeon, tested by another type of doctor, and left to figure everything else out by myself, so I don't know who to ask. My question is this. Can I have your opinions as to whether you know/think this procedure could harm me in the long run? Obviously if there is a risk that it will badly affect my body, then I will just endure it naturally. To all of you women who have had children - what did you do when you gave birth? Any stories of your experiences would be a great help since I can't seem to find any information regarding this. Thanks in advance for any help! Holly VanDyne Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 1, 2002 Report Share Posted July 1, 2002 Hi Holly, I have had 5 babies. I did number #1, #2 and #4 with only dimeral or staital (sp). I had baby number #3 and #5 with an epidural. I was very senstive to the epidural. It didn't wear off for hours after I had the baby. With baby number #5 half of the " normal " dose was to strong. Even my eye lids went to sleep. I had a hard time swallowing. It was very scary. So when I say sensitive I mean sensitive. But on the bright side my #3 baby epidural was great. The epidural doctor knew a little about CMT . I didn't have any problems at all. Except it took a while to wear off but that was Okay with me. I didn't have to feel many after pains. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 1, 2002 Report Share Posted July 1, 2002 Hi Again,Holly, After having 5 children and very long labors I can assure you that a C -section is not necessary just because we have CMT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 1, 2002 Report Share Posted July 1, 2002 Hi, I have experienced one labor which was four weeks earlier than expected. This is my own personal advice, go for a C-section which I had. For me they only did this after ten hours of labor which did not do any good. I do not think this period in labor did my CMT any good, but if they had gone ahead with the C-section it would have been much easier. If you choose to do this, then you can dicuss in advance the requirement of specialised Anesthetic treatment regarding your CMT, and this would be easier on you and your baby. Keep me posted on how you get along. I would love to help further with any advice, producing a baby is a really wonderful experience and you are so right to seek our experiences, I so wish I had that at the time. P. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.