Guest guest Posted August 26, 2002 Report Share Posted August 26, 2002 (Older article on resistance training in which CMT people participated in - from the Netherlands)~ G 1: J Electromyogr Kinesiol 1999 Dec;9(6):379-84 Progressive resistance training in neuromuscular patients. Effects on force and surface EMG. Lindeman E, Spaans F, Reulen J, Leffers P, Drukker J. Department of Rehabilitation, University Hospital Maastricht, The Netherlands. e.lindeman@... In a randomized clinical trial the efficacy of strength training was studied in patients with myotonic dystrophy (n = 33) and in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (n = 29). Measurements were performed at the start and after 8, 16 and 24 weeks of progressive resistance training. Surface electromyography (SEMG) of proximal leg muscles was recorded during isometric knee extension at maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) and at 20, 40, 60 and 80% of MVC. Changes in MVC, maximum electrical activity and torque-EMG ratios (TER) were calculated. Fatigue was studied by determining the changes in endurance and in the decline of the median frequency (Fmed) of the SEMG during a sustained contraction at 80% MVC. These parameters showed no significant changes after the training in either of the diagnostic groups. Only the Charcot-Marie-Tooth training group showed a gradual significant increase in mean MVC over the whole training period (21%). After 24 weeks, the increase in mean RMS was similar (25%), but this was mainly due to a sharp rise during the first 8 weeks of training (20%). The findings indicate that the initial strength increase was due to a neural factor, while the subsequent increase was mainly due to muscle hypertrophy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.