Guest guest Posted December 16, 1999 Report Share Posted December 16, 1999 Wanted to share this response from BioPort. We are licensed to produce the anthrax vaccine. If you are familiar with the FDA process, whenever changes are made in the process, the FDA reinspects the facility. The FDA must approve the new facility before any product can be released for sale. The approval process is time consuming and takes 6 to 12 months which is normal. Bob Bidlingmeyer Web Site > SubjectOther: > Username: Elliott > UserEmail: elliottdsr@... > UserTel: > UserFAX: > ContactRequested: ContactRequested > Date: 12/16/99 > Time: 12:41:02 AM > Remote Name: 205.188.193.188 > Remote User: > HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; MSN 2.6; AOL 5.0; Windows 98; MCIWORLDV2) > > Comments: > > I am confused. I read in the paper and see on television that you are not licensed to produce Anthrax Vaccine absorbed at your renovate facility and your process and vaccine have failed approval by the FDA, yet you state on this web site that you are licensed and that your license to produce the anthrax vaccine absorbed is #1260. Are you licensed to produce this vaccine? If you are licensed, why aren't you delivering this vaccine to the Department of Defense? If you are not currently licensed, why are you making statements that you are licensed? Please help me clear up this confusion. Thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 1999 Report Share Posted December 16, 1999 To All, Am I correct in a deduction that " LICENSING " and " APPROVAL " are not one in the same? If so, let's get these terms and definitions straight right now. Both terms have been used in DOD propaganda and I asked this question many months ago. " Is having a license to produce the vaccine the same as having an approval to distribute it? " TW ELLIOTTDSR@... wrote: > Wanted to share this response from BioPort. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: Re: Feedback > Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 10:14:46 -0500 > From: " Bob Bidlingmeyer " <bidlingmeyer@...> > <elliottdsr@...> > References: <0101934400510c9PHADEA@...> > > We are licensed to produce the anthrax vaccine. If you are familiar with > the FDA process, whenever changes are made in the process, the FDA > reinspects the facility. The FDA must approve the new facility before any > product can be released for sale. The approval process is time consuming > and takes 6 to 12 months which is normal. > Bob Bidlingmeyer > Web Site > > SubjectOther: > > Username: Elliott > > UserEmail: elliottdsr@... > > UserTel: > > UserFAX: > > ContactRequested: ContactRequested > > Date: 12/16/99 > > Time: 12:41:02 AM > > Remote Name: 205.188.193.188 > > Remote User: > > HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; MSN 2.6; AOL 5.0; > Windows 98; MCIWORLDV2) > > > > Comments: > > > > I am confused. I read in the paper and see on television that you are not > licensed to produce Anthrax Vaccine absorbed at your renovate facility and > your process and vaccine have failed approval by the FDA, yet you state on > this web site that you are licensed and that your license to produce the > anthrax vaccine absorbed is #1260. Are you licensed to produce this > vaccine? If you are licensed, why aren't you delivering this vaccine to the > Department of Defense? If you are not currently licensed, why are you > making statements that you are licensed? Please help me clear up this > confusion. Thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 7, 2002 Report Share Posted October 7, 2002 Is there a list of foods to avoid. feedback Beverly and others.Thanks for providing feedback on my posts. It helps to know where my thinking my be off track. For myself, I have noticed a benefit from cutting many foods out of my diet (I didn't eat very healthy anyway), but as you say, I need to strive for a balance. It is still puzzling, because I can be okay for a while and then for no apparent reason I seem to react to something. I can't figure out why this is, but there are so many environmental factors I'm sure I'm not aware of. You're right, I'd almost forgotten what it was like when I could smell. Now, I have no idea what people are wearing (perfume-wise), when there are toxic smells or anything of the sort. Thanks.Mike Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 21, 2008 Report Share Posted August 21, 2008 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2008 Report Share Posted September 8, 2008 Hi , We live in Canada. The only cost I had was paying a ridiculous amount for the TV in my room. I didn't even bother with the phone because I rarely felt up to chatting. I was in a private room and we only have semi-private coverage. The worst thing would be that you would have to share a room in a ward, but I highly doubt that due to the nature of your surgery. (Just wanted to throw that in) Whatever you decide, I'll be cheering for you! . achalasia@...: jamiemcrae33@...: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 03:28:54 +0000Subject: Feedback Everyone's feedback is great. I feel that with the open heller failing after only 10 months, and the dilitation not really working, I don't know what else to do. This Dr. is suppose to be one of the best. I will ask him what he thinks about botox and scaring. I too wish when I was first diagnosed that they did the myotomy first without all the dilitations. You stretch and band so many times and the only thing it's going to do is break, and that's my fear. I would love to take you up on your offer susan but realistically it just would not be possible. Now if I happened to take a trip and have an emergency and have coverage, that may be a different matter lol.Let's put it this way. I want to hear feedback. Put yourself in my shoes, if you have had A for over twenty years, 4 dilitations (I lost count), and open heller (that failed), and the Dr. suggested botox for the fist time, would you do it?I'm guessing no, but I would like to see what others say. That way I can ask Dr. Marcon and see what his reaction is. I liked my original Dr. Diamant better but I was told he retired. He teached at University of Toronto and probably trained Dr. Rice lol. He was old school, neve wanted to do surgery. Again, I look forward to hearing from everyone. _________________________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 jamiemcrae33 wrote: > if you have had A for over twenty years, 4 dilitations (I lost > count), and open heller (that failed), and the Dr. suggested botox > for the fist time, would you do it? > Having botox after surgery is not the same as having it before your first myotomy. Still it may cause scarring but much of the myotomy area has already been cut and there will be some scarring from that. The botox may give a good indication of how well another surgery to improve the old myotomy would work. If the botox works it tells you that weakening the muscles more would likely improve your symptoms. Unfortunately if it doesn't work you can't tell if that has any implications for surgery good or bad, because it could be botox just does not effect you. I don't see having botox for the rest of your life being much of an option though. Seems like that would be a lot of scarring and likely to quit working at some point. There would be time between treatments when you would start fighting symptoms again unless you have more before symptoms start returning. I have to wonder if all the time fighting symptoms waiting for each next treatment would have any bad effect on the esophagus in the long-term. notan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.