Guest guest Posted October 25, 2002 Report Share Posted October 25, 2002 http://www.reason.com/rb/rb100902.shtml A BRIED CLIP FROM THE ARTICLE: Metcalfe is just one of thousands of ---I just had to make a comment on the writter of this article. Mr. has written some incredibly rediculous articles (this is the first one I have read which doesn't make me want to be sick). Take for instance an article he wrote a few months back about how we need to bring back DDT because it saves so many people. He opposes organics and I am very suprised to learn he appreciates the conservation of rare animals. In other articles he make minor points that are majorly out weighed by things like bringing DDT back. After reading these 2 attached articles I and many friends sent replys to this magazine because we were absolutely furious at his articles. Since that time I have not read his articles - I hope this is a change for the better (but I doubt it!). Here are a few of his best-- a.. Silent Spring at 40 Carson's classic is not aging well. June 12, 2002. a.. Organic Alchemy Organic farming could kill billions of people. June 5, 2002. Here are a few exerps from another of his recent articles - his comments on organic food have fecks of truth, but miss the alternatives of conventional farming, which are far worse! His point of view is from the United States standard of living - and he is absolutely right that if the whole world lived like Americans we wouldn't have any precious lands left. However if we stick to conventional farming we won't have any topsoil in a few year and then farming is totally impossible, but I suppose we could make some more chemicals to fix this!! And why should they care? Food today is cheap, nutritious, and safe. I, too, cannot resist organic heirloom tomatoes. I buy organic not because such foods are ecologically or nutritionally superior-they aren't-but simply because the local lady who grows the wines, Mortgage Lifters, and Yellow Pears I crave chooses that method of production. I'm glad she grows them, not least because that means that I don't have to anymore. For those who are deluded enough to think that organic foods are nutritionally superior, the market makes the opportunity to buy them widely available, generally at a 30-percent price premium. (Ideologically motivated organic aficionados should keep in mind that organic production typically yields a third less food than other means. That means that more land is being plowed down, leaving less for forests and other wildlands.) But there is something wrong with the puritanical notion that it's a sin to live in blithe ignorance of the ultimate sources of your nourishment. Life is too short for most people to learn how to fix their computers and cars, and too short for most to learn about food production. And that's just fine. Eating shouldn't be a moral duty; it should be a pleasure. Sorry for the Rant!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 25, 2002 Report Share Posted October 25, 2002 http://www.reason.com/rb/rb100902.shtml A BRIED CLIP FROM THE ARTICLE: Metcalfe is just one of thousands of people around the world who are devoted to the private conservation of domestic varieties of animals and plants from extinction. Aside from farm animals, thousands of people and hundreds of private organizations, both nonprofit and for-profit, are working to preserve and propagate heirloom varieties of plants. The Abundant Life Seed Foundation has been saving, propagating, and selling heirloom seeds since 1975. The foundation's catalog offers hundreds of varieties of heirloom vegetables, including Bull's Heart and Dixie Golden Giant tomatoes, Shoepeg and Golden Midget sweet corn, and Aztec Red Kidney and Clem & 's Big beans Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.