Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: chicken broth

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

I would think the only reason to leave the lid off would be to make the

broth more concentrated, if that is what you want. If you are cooking the

broth for days, you'll just waste a lot of power simming away water that you

have to keep replenishing.

Come to think of it, it may be that they suggest leaving the lid off the

beef broth is to encourage the impurities to come to the top where they can

be skimmed off (in theory). I would think that would apply to chickens also.

Once you have skimmed, I would think it makes sense to put the lid on and

continue simmering gently. If you have organic animals, I wouldn't think

impurities would be much of a problem.

Peace,

Kris , gardening in harmony with nature in northwest Ohio

If you want to hear the good news about butter check out this website:

http://www.westonaprice.org/know_your_fats/know_your_fats.html

----- Original Message -----

From: " Joy Kortas " <joyk10@...>

< >

Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2002 9:27 AM

Subject: chicken broth

> Does anyone know why the NT chicken broth recipe is cooked with the lid on

> and the beef broth recipe is cooked with the lid off?

>

> I always end up with much more bulk with the chicken broth as opposed to

the

> beef broth.

>

> Thanks,

> Joy

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a message dated 11/16/02 9:35:29 AM Eastern Standard Time,

joyk10@... writes:

> Does anyone know why the NT chicken broth recipe is cooked with the lid on

> and the beef broth recipe is cooked with the lid off?

>

> I always end up with much more bulk with the chicken broth as opposed to

the

> beef broth.

Is it really? I didn't even notice this, I always left the lid on both.

BUT, I have noticed that, for some reason, water simmers away substantially

when I make chicken stock, but not when I cook beef stock hardly at all. I

suppose that might have something to do with it.

Chris

____

" What can one say of a soul, of a heart, filled with compassion? It is a

heart which burns with love for every creature: for human beings, birds, and

animals, for serpents and for demons. The thought of them and the sight of

them make the tears of the saint flow. And this immense and intense

compassion, which flows from the heart of the saints, makes them unable to

bear the sight of the smallest, most insignificant wound in any creature.

Thus they pray ceaselessly, with tears, even for animals, for enemies of the

truth, and for those who do them wrong. "

--Saint Isaac the Syrian

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a message dated 11/16/02 12:35:00 PM Eastern Standard Time,

kris.johnson@... writes:

> If you have organic animals, I wouldn't think

> impurities would be much of a problem.

I read on an article on WAPF that the impurities aren't just toxins and stuff

but are largely lectins and certain proteins and natural compounds that would

have negative or irritative health effects, aside from an off-flavor. The

beef bones I get from Bread and Circus are from " all-natural " animals, and

their definition of " all-natural " is only slightly different from " organic, "

and I usually get a massive amount of skum that foams up inches high, whereas

I get relatively little when making chicken stock from an all-natural

free-range chicken. So I think the difference seems to be in the natural

composition of the bones rather than the amount of accumulated toxins.

Chris

____

" What can one say of a soul, of a heart, filled with compassion? It is a

heart which burns with love for every creature: for human beings, birds, and

animals, for serpents and for demons. The thought of them and the sight of

them make the tears of the saint flow. And this immense and intense

compassion, which flows from the heart of the saints, makes them unable to

bear the sight of the smallest, most insignificant wound in any creature.

Thus they pray ceaselessly, with tears, even for animals, for enemies of the

truth, and for those who do them wrong. "

--Saint Isaac the Syrian

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always keep the lid on. I am always nervous of the water boiling away

completely and starting a fire. The impurities or scum usually form anyway.

I guess it could depend on the water?

Robin

From: " Kris " <kris.johnson@...>

Reply-

< >

Subject: Re: chicken broth

Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 12:30:46 -0500

I would think the only reason to leave the lid off would be to make the

broth more concentrated, if that is what you want. If you are cooking the

broth for days, you'll just waste a lot of power simming away water that you

have to keep replenishing.

Come to think of it, it may be that they suggest leaving the lid off the

beef broth is to encourage the impurities to come to the top where they can

be skimmed off (in theory). I would think that would apply to chickens also.

Once you have skimmed, I would think it makes sense to put the lid on and

continue simmering gently. If you have organic animals, I wouldn't think

impurities would be much of a problem.

Peace,

Kris , gardening in harmony with nature in northwest Ohio

If you want to hear the good news about butter check out this website:

http://www.westonaprice.org/know_your_fats/know_your_fats.html

----- Original Message -----

From: " Joy Kortas " <joyk10@...>

< >

Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2002 9:27 AM

Subject: chicken broth

> Does anyone know why the NT chicken broth recipe is cooked with the lid

on

> and the beef broth recipe is cooked with the lid off?

>

> I always end up with much more bulk with the chicken broth as opposed to

the

> beef broth.

>

> Thanks,

> Joy

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robin-

It's interesting that you mention that the scum could have to do with

the water. I've been meaning to mention here that I made a chicken

brined in prill water and then made the stock in the brine as I usually

do. The chicken and the broth were both super clean. When I cut up the

chicken, I hardly felt like I needed to wash my hands afterwards. And it

was really tender and juicy despite a very short brining time (just 4-5

hours). I've done the same chickens with longer brines (24 hours or so)

with regular water and didn't get as good of results. The stock was

clear and didn't have any scum on top.

Meg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meg,

What do you mean by " chicken brined in prill water " ?

Kris

> It's interesting that you mention that the scum could have to do with

> the water. I've been meaning to mention here that I made a chicken

> brined in prill water and then made the stock in the brine as I usually

> do. The chicken and the broth were both super clean. When I cut up the

> chicken, I hardly felt like I needed to wash my hands afterwards. And it

> was really tender and juicy despite a very short brining time (just 4-5

> hours). I've done the same chickens with longer brines (24 hours or so)

> with regular water and didn't get as good of results. The stock was

> clear and didn't have any scum on top.

>

> Meg

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We were just discussing prill water on the list a week or 2 ago.. it's

" thin " water that you make by putting prill beads in water. It's said to

be like dew or like mountain run-off water. " Brining " means soaking in a

salt-water solution. I usually add about 1/2 c. unrefined salt to a

gallon or so of water to brine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...