Guest guest Posted October 18, 2002 Report Share Posted October 18, 2002 OK. I just want to know people's opinions. I'm trying to weigh the pros and cons and decide if I should eat any fish. Are all fish, just some fish (if so, then which fish?), or no fish high in mercury? If mercury levels are high, do you think that there is more good than bad in the fish? What I mean is, would you still eat a certain fish regardless of its mercury content just because it is so high in good stuff? Are all oceans or just some oceans contaminated? Are shellfish particularly polluted? Do fish harbor to many " evil organisms " to be eaten raw? Are freshwater fish more or less contaminated than saltwater? Do freshwater fish have just as much " good " as saltwater? Are farmed shrimp and oysters okay? Are any farmed fish okay? On a side issue, some quite healthy primitives ate as their sole animal food, seafoods. How did they get saturated fat? This doesn't apply as much to the Eskimos as it does to primitives in the tropics... Also, I have a zinc deficiency. I want to control it with foods. The problem is, how do I know land foods contain zinc? They could have been grown/raised on zinc deficient soil. I see seafood as the only sure course of action. That's why I am asking about fish, shellfish (and oysters) in particular. Have any tips for zinc? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.