Guest guest Posted May 11, 2011 Report Share Posted May 11, 2011 On cell phone radiation What we said: " The cellular phone industry, wielding the threat of litigation, intimidated San Francisco into shelving a law that would have required point-of-sale disclosure of phones' radiation levels. The industry had similarly pressured the Federal Communications Commission to back down from its recommendation that customers consider a unit's specific absorption rate (that rate at which the body absorbs radiofrequency energy from a phone) when making a purchase. But the concerns about the potential danger of cell phone radiation will not go away so easily. " - Editorial, May 7, 2011 What happened: On Monday, the Senate Environmental Quality Committee approved legislation (SB932, by Sen. Mark Leno, D-San Francisco) that would require in-store displays and manufacturers' websites to advise customers that the units emit radiation, and to consult their user manuals for tips on how to reduce exposure. San Francisco supervisors also are considering a scaled-back version of the disclosure law that was shelved. What's next: A statewide standard makes the most sense, and Leno's bill is a modest but important step forward. Nearly all manufacturers include advice on reducing radiation exposure - using a hands-free device, keeping cell phones out of pockets, limiting call time - but that notice is typically buried deep in the manuals, often in tiny print... This article appeared on page A - 11 of the San Francisco Chronicle http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/05/11/ED151JE8JG.DTL & feed=\ rss.opinion Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.