Guest guest Posted March 14, 2002 Report Share Posted March 14, 2002 [1] Arizona Research and Education Ltd, Phoenix, Arizona, USA [*]Correspondence and offprints: Sanford H. Roth, Arizona Research and Education Ltd, 3330 N. 2nd Street Suite 601, Phoenix, AZ 85012, USA. Abstract: Arthritis, rheumatic diseases, spinal and peripheral joint disorders share in common a legacy of chronic pain. At the turn of the millennium, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAIDs) had replaced aspirin as the agents most commonly used to deal with rheumatic symptoms, including pain. Paracetamol (acetaminophen) was the most common alternative analgesic for minor pain. Opioids were most commonly used on an ad-lib basis, usually for 'breakthrough' pain. However, neurobiological research has confirmed the basis for 24-hour around-the-clock complete suppression of chronic nonmalignant pain. This avoids the 'wind up' that leads to intractable pain progression. Proper monitoring, in the absence of the end organ toxicity seen with NSAIDs, allows a change in direction to opioids for arthritis for more severe pain. This requires understanding the responsibilities of maintaining opioids, in properly selected patients, based upon host response and informed consent. Under such circumstances, evidence-based trials support the use of stronger opioids in recalcitrant chronic pain of arthritis. Thus, we endeavour to better fulfill our Oath of Hippocrates: 'to relieve pain and suffering'. ----------------------------------------------------------- Gastroprotective Therapy and Risk of Gastrointestinal Ulcers: Risk Reduction by COX-2 Therapy FREDERICK WOLFE, JANICE ANDERSON, THOMAS A. BURKE, LESTER M. ARGUELLES, and DAN PETTITT ABSTRACT. Objective. Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and misoprostol decrease the risk of development of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug induced gastric ulcers and aid healing of upper gastrointestinal (GI) ulcers. H2 receptor antagonists (H2RA) are less effective for this task, but are widely used by patients and physicians for the treatment of GI symptoms and duodenal ulcers. Sucralfate is a weaker agent that is sometimes used for prophylaxis or treatment of upper GI ulcers. We investigated the effect of GI drugs and selective and nonselective NSAID on the incidence of GI ulcer development in a cohort of patients immediately after the release of celecoxib and rofecoxib to investigate the effect of confounding by indication when effective GI agents and cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2)-specific inhibitors are prescribed to a high risk population. Methods. During a 6 month period of observation 8547 NSAID users were evaluated by mailed questionnaire concerning NSAID drug use and ulcer development. In the first half of 1999, patients took 12,177 separate NSAID courses. GI therapy that followed the development of upper GI ulcers was excluded from analysis. Ulcer reports were confirmed by followup validation. Results. GI drugs were used concomitantly in this population by 42% of patients using an NSAID. GI drugs were associated with an increased risk of ulcer. But this risk was confined to PPI (OR 4.1, 95% CI 2.95, 5.69), and not to other GI drugs. Overall, patients using nonselective NSAID compared to those taking COX-2-specific inhibitors had an increased risk of upper GI ulcers (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.43, 3.34). Patients taking nonselective NSAID plus PPI were also at increased risk for upper GI ulcers compared to those taking nonselective NSAID alone (OR 5.09, 95% CI 3.88, 6.67). Similarly, the risk of upper GI ulcers was increased in the nonselective NSAID plus PPI group (OR 3.83, 95% CI 2.32, 6.31) compared to the COX-2 plus PPI group. Conclusion. PPI use, but not other GI drug use, is a marker for increased susceptibility to ulcers among NSAID users. This risk of upper GI ulcers is increased in PPI users regardless of which NSAID is used (nonselective or COX-2-specific inhibitor). Although COX-2 use is associated with greater risk factors for upper GI ulcers due to channeling bias, COX-2 users have significantly fewer ulcers than equivalent nonselective NSAID users regardless of concomitant PPI utilization. (J Rheumatol 2002;29:467-73) ------------------------------------------------------ 03/11/2002 By Anne MacLennan Pre- and postmenopausal women with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) have reduced hip bone mineral density. As well, bone turnover in these patients is characterised by low serum osteocalcin and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase. These are the findings of a study of bone mineral density (BMD), calcaneal ultrasound and bone turnover markers in women with this condition. Participants in the study were 50 pre- and 16 postmenopausal women with AS; 132 women of similar age served as controls. The objective of these researchers was two-fold: 1) to assess BMD using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and calcaneal quantitative ultrasound (QUS) in women with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and 2) to determine if there are any relationships between bone turnover markers and disease activity or severity. Researchers assessed clinical and radiological status by the Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Bath AS Functional Index (BASFI), Bath AS Metrology Index (BASMI) and Bath AS Radiology Index (BASRI). BMD of the hip and spine was measured by DEXA, and QUS was measured at the heel. Serum osteocalcin (OC), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BALP), urinary D-pyridinoline crosslinks (D-PYR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) were assayed. The 66 women with AS compared with control patients had reduced BMD at the hip. For pre- and postmenopausal women, mean t scores were -1.1 and -2.0 respectively, and z scores were -0.4 and -0.37. Four of the women (6 percent) had osteoporosis, and 34 (52 percent) had osteopenia by the WHO definitions. In further analysis (multiple regression), the authors found femoral neck BMD to be significantly affected by age, body mass index, and the sacroiliac radiographic score. There were no significant correlations of BMD with disease duration or disease activity. QUS measures did not correlate with DEXA measures of BMD. Women with AS had significantly lower markers of bone formation, OC and BALP, and a trend to higher D-PYR than controls. Serum OC levels correlated negatively with femoral neck BMD, whereas D-PYR correlated with CRP levels. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.