Re: Bob Beck Protocol Question?

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 3/13/2008 6:58:59 AM Eastern Daylight Time, paulusonline@... writes:

I notice that when i place the electrodes over where i THINK the pulseshould be on the wrists...

Website with pictures of electrode placement.

http://tinyurl.com/264bam

Dotsie

It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms and advice on AOL Money Finance.

[Guest guest]

Dear Beck Practitioneer:

Plenty of photos abound on The Internet - Best guess works fine - If it worries you, consult an anatomy book - Put plenty of time using the equipment - The positioning is not super critical; wearing the pulser is...

=====================================================================

Bob Beck Protocol Question?

Any assistance is greatful....

just started the Bob Beck protocol THIS week and question is....

ANY tips on LOCATING the pulse points for the Arteries?

I notice that when i place the electrodes over where i THINK the pulse

should be on the wrists...my hand and fingers twitch in time to the

alternating pulse....Q: is THIS a good indication that i HAVE found

the correct positions or any other suggestions...I want to be doing

this correctly..

thanks in advance.

Supercharge your AIM. Get the AIM toolbar for your browser.

[Guest guest]

>

>

> In a message dated 3/13/2008 6:58:59 AM Eastern Daylight Time,

> paulusonline@... writes:

>

> I notice that when i place the electrodes over where i THINK the pulse

> should be on the wrists...

>

>

>

> Website with pictures of electrode placement.

>

> _http://tinyurl.com/264bam_ (http://tinyurl.com/264bam)

>

> Dotsie

>

>

>

>

>

> **************It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms, and advice on AOL Money &

> Finance. (http://money.aol.com/tax?NCID=aolprf00030000000001)

>

Many thanks....Another Q: You think four weeks is ENOUGH..2 hours

electrification a day...and 2 x 20 minutes magnetic pulser sessions,

plus the silver? HOW long before detox occurs in your experience? Ooly

four days now)

[Guest guest]

see

http://www.geocities.com/a57ngel/bioelectric/eng/hands.html

for correct electrode placement

________________________________________________________________________________\

____

Never miss a thing. Make your home page.

http://www./r/hs

[Guest guest]

Hi

i could not get to the site with the correct electrode placement

can you please send it again

thank you

K

On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 4:40 AM, Forrest <a57ngel@...> wrote:

seehttp://www.geocities.com/a57ngel/bioelectric/eng/hands.htmlfor correct electrode placement__________________________________________________________

Never miss a thing. Make your home page. http://www./r/hs

[Guest guest]

drawing of correct electrodes placement on both

wrists:

http://www.geocities.com/a57ngel/bioelectric/images/hands.jpg

________________________________________________________________________________\

____

Never miss a thing. Make your home page.

http://www./r/hs

[Guest guest]

I little misleading: It shows one electrode on one wrist and the

other on the opposite wrist.

NOTE: Both electrodes should be on one wrist only.

NEVER place one electrode on one wrist with the other on the

opposite wrist.

:>)

>

> drawing of correct electrodes placement on both

> wrists:

> http://www.geocities.com/a57ngel/bioelectric/images/hands.jpg

>

>

>

_____________________________________________________________________

_______________

> Never miss a thing. Make your home page.

> http://www./r/hs

>

[Guest guest]

thank you

K

On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 11:37 AM, sotainstruments <russ@...> wrote:

I little misleading: It shows one electrode on one wrist and the other on the opposite wrist. NOTE: Both electrodes should be on one wrist only. NEVER place one electrode on one wrist with the other on the

opposite wrist.:>)>> drawing of correct electrodes placement on both> wrists: > http://www.geocities.com/a57ngel/bioelectric/images/hands.jpg

> > > _________________________________________________________________________> Never miss a thing. Make your home page. > http://www./r/hs

>

[Guest guest]

I'm sorry but my understanding is that is how Beck was

doing it in the beginning (after first starting with

the ankles) and then just made an allowance to do it

on one wrist for convenience sake. I see no good

reason for not using both wrists. I did it that way

for years with no problems. Most of my customers did

it that way also with never a complaint. I don't

believe it is bad for the heart IF in fact it actually

goes thru it. Knowing that electricity always takes

the path of least resistance there is no reason for

the current to take a detour down into the heart,

swirl around and affect as much of it as possible, and

then get back into the main artery toward the opposite

electrode. If they use one wrist then it is unknown

how much electrical current just crosses the 2 inch

distance to the other electrode without coursing thru

the arteries blood. Even better than using 2 wrists is

using 2 ankles because the blood volume in the legs

arteries is even more, so more blood would be

affected. That is how I zap myself now. I set my unit

on 10 hertz and go to sleep with it on me.

Look at this picture of the heart. You see how the

blue and red arteries have their red-to-red and

blue-to-blue above the heart? That's where the

electrical current would be flowing thru, not down

into the heart which would be a less direct path to

the opposite electrode.

________________________________________________________________________________\

____

Looking for last minute shopping deals?

Find them fast with Search.

http://tools.search./newsearch/category.php?category=shopping

[Guest guest]

But , did you not ever see a Bob Beck video? Never has he

ever shown to use one electrode on one wrist with the other

electrode on the opposite wrist. Bob made a point of mentioning at

his lectures to never bring the heart into the electrical path.

Yes, electricity takes the path of least resistance. The path of

least resistance IS the blood! Therefore the electricity will most

definitely follow the along the arteries and go right to the heart!

This introduces a HUGE liability and risk. Why even chance it??

I have to make a firm stand here: Please, only use ONE wrist for

blood pulsing. Feel free to pulse as you wish Micheal, but I cannot

advocate this potentially dangerous placement of the electrodes and

I cannot say with any certanty that the protocol would even work as

expected this way. Why? Because the current delivered will be at a

higher density when the electrodes are close together as the

resistance presented to the electrodes will be far smaller. In fact,

now that I mention it I wonder if the protocol has much effect with

electrodes a couple of feet apart?

I mean no offence, just passing on my opinion of the subject as I

have come to know it and use it from Bob Beck.

Russ :>)

>

> I'm sorry but my understanding is that is how Beck was

> doing it in the beginning (after first starting with

> the ankles) and then just made an allowance to do it

> on one wrist for convenience sake. I see no good

> reason for not using both wrists. I did it that way

> for years with no problems. Most of my customers did

> it that way also with never a complaint. I don't

> believe it is bad for the heart IF in fact it actually

> goes thru it. Knowing that electricity always takes

> the path of least resistance there is no reason for

> the current to take a detour down into the heart,

> swirl around and affect as much of it as possible, and

> then get back into the main artery toward the opposite

> electrode. If they use one wrist then it is unknown

> how much electrical current just crosses the 2 inch

> distance to the other electrode without coursing thru

> the arteries blood. Even better than using 2 wrists is

> using 2 ankles because the blood volume in the legs

> arteries is even more, so more blood would be

> affected. That is how I zap myself now. I set my unit

> on 10 hertz and go to sleep with it on me.

> Look at this picture of the heart. You see how the

> blue and red arteries have their red-to-red and

> blue-to-blue above the heart? That's where the

> electrical current would be flowing thru, not down

> into the heart which would be a less direct path to

> the opposite electrode.

>

>

>

_____________________________________________________________________

_______________

> Looking for last minute shopping deals?

> Find them fast with Search.

http://tools.search./newsearch/category.php?

category=shopping

>

[Guest guest]

I totally agree with Russ and the late Bob Beck on this. Why take such a chance and then give your survivors a reason to blast this great protocol upon your possible death. Tom

From: sotainstruments

Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 9:54 AM

Subject: Re: Bob Beck Protocol Question?

But , did you not ever see a Bob Beck video? Never has he

ever shown to use one electrode on one wrist with the other

electrode on the opposite wrist. Bob made a point of mentioning at

his lectures to never bring the heart into the electrical path.

Yes, electricity takes the path of least resistance. The path of

least resistance IS the blood! Therefore the electricity will most

definitely follow the along the arteries and go right to the heart!

This introduces a HUGE liability and risk. Why even chance it??

I have to make a firm stand here: Please, only use ONE wrist for

blood pulsing. Feel free to pulse as you wish Micheal, but I cannot

advocate this potentially dangerous placement of the electrodes and

I cannot say with any certanty that the protocol would even work as

expected this way. Why? Because the current delivered will be at a

higher density when the electrodes are close together as the

resistance presented to the electrodes will be far smaller. In fact,

now that I mention it I wonder if the protocol has much effect with

electrodes a couple of feet apart?

I mean no offence, just passing on my opinion of the subject as I

have come to know it and use it from Bob Beck.

Russ :>)

>

> I'm sorry but my understanding is that is how Beck was

> doing it in the beginning (after first starting with

> the ankles) and then just made an allowance to do it

> on one wrist for convenience sake. I see no good

> reason for not using both wrists. I did it that way

> for years with no problems. Most of my customers did

> it that way also with never a complaint. I don't

> believe it is bad for the heart IF in fact it actually

> goes thru it. Knowing that electricity always takes

> the path of least resistance there is no reason for

> the current to take a detour down into the heart,

> swirl around and affect as much of it as possible, and

> then get back into the main artery toward the opposite

> electrode. If they use one wrist then it is unknown

> how much electrical current just crosses the 2 inch

> distance to the other electrode without coursing thru

> the arteries blood. Even better than using 2 wrists is

> using 2 ankles because the blood volume in the legs

> arteries is even more, so more blood would be

> affected. That is how I zap myself now. I set my unit

> on 10 hertz and go to sleep with it on me.

> Look at this picture of the heart. You see how the

> blue and red arteries have their red-to-red and

> blue-to-blue above the heart? That's where the

> electrical current would be flowing thru, not down

> into the heart which would be a less direct path to

> the opposite electrode.

>

>

>

__________________________________________________________

_______________

> Looking for last minute shopping deals?

> Find them fast with Search.

http://tools.search./newsearch/category.php?

category=shopping

>

[Guest guest]

I'll begin my proof by submitting to you all this

page:

http://www.geocities.com/a57ngel/club/wrist-cir.html

which shows how far from the heart the top of the

aorta is where the electrical current flows from one

arm artery to the other.

________________________________________________________________________________\

____

Never miss a thing. Make your home page.

http://www./r/hs

[Guest guest]

Hi ,

You do what you feel you have to. I do not advocate this in any way.

Electricity also follows numerous parallel pathways.

Why in the world would you chance such a risk???

For all SOTA customers, do not use the SOTA blood pulser in this

way. We DO NOT advocate this, and we feel the potential for harm is

very real. That is our stand.

Again, you do what you feel you need to . I will never agree

with it. Period. I have had too much electronics background to feel

otherwise.

No offence, but count me out. However, I need to let my customers

know my take on this.

Cheers!

Russ :>)

>

> I'll begin my proof by submitting to you all this

> page:

> http://www.geocities.com/a57ngel/club/wrist-cir.html

> which shows how far from the heart the top of the

> aorta is where the electrical current flows from one

> arm artery to the other.

>

>

>

_____________________________________________________________________

_______________

> Never miss a thing. Make your home page.

> http://www./r/hs

>

[Guest guest]

>Electricity also follows numerous parallel pathways.

Yes but the farther away you get from the main pathway

the less the current is. I would geusstimate it would

be hundreds of times less. But you would need the full

current (100 microamps) to affect the heart. maybe

more. You had wrote that the Magnetic Pulser induces

around that much current into tissue close to the

coil. Last night I used my Pulser, which is around 50%

more magnetically powerful than yours, directly on my

heart area with no perceived effect at all. And I'm

50!

>Why in the world would you chance such a risk???

Risk? The only risk here is falling back into

primitive irrational fears which I refuse to do.

There's enough resistance already to using

microcurrents for health due to irrational fears. I'm

not going to add to it.

I will submit a drawing that will help illustrate my

point about " parallel currents " .

Next step after that is making a model of the aorta

with the arm arteries connecting to it, all out of

clay. Let it harden, connect electrodes, fill it with

electrically conductive saltwater, apply 100 microamps

to the arm arteries, and measure the insignificantly

small parallel currents 2 inches away from the top of

the aorta.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

" It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is

essential is invisible to the eye. " Antoine De Saint-Exupery

Political animated comics:

http://www.markfiore.com/animation/stay.html

________________________________________________________________________________\

____

Looking for last minute shopping deals?

Find them fast with Search.

http://tools.search./newsearch/category.php?category=shopping

[Guest guest]

hmmm...I'm listening!

..... :>)

>

> >Electricity also follows numerous parallel pathways.

>

> Yes but the farther away you get from the main pathway

> the less the current is. I would geusstimate it would

> be hundreds of times less. But you would need the full

> current (100 microamps) to affect the heart. maybe

> more. You had wrote that the Magnetic Pulser induces

> around that much current into tissue close to the

> coil. Last night I used my Pulser, which is around 50%

> more magnetically powerful than yours, directly on my

> heart area with no perceived effect at all. And I'm

> 50!

>

> >Why in the world would you chance such a risk???

>

> Risk? The only risk here is falling back into

> primitive irrational fears which I refuse to do.

> There's enough resistance already to using

> microcurrents for health due to irrational fears. I'm

> not going to add to it.

>

> I will submit a drawing that will help illustrate my

> point about " parallel currents " .

> Next step after that is making a model of the aorta

> with the arm arteries connecting to it, all out of

> clay. Let it harden, connect electrodes, fill it with

> electrically conductive saltwater, apply 100 microamps

> to the arm arteries, and measure the insignificantly

> small parallel currents 2 inches away from the top of

> the aorta.

>

>

>

> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

> " It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is

> essential is invisible to the eye. " Antoine De Saint-Exupery

>

> Political animated comics:

> http://www.markfiore.com/animation/stay.html

>

>

>

_____________________________________________________________________

_______________

> Looking for last minute shopping deals?

> Find them fast with Search.

http://tools.search./newsearch/category.php?

category=shopping

>

[Guest guest]

please see

http://www.geocities.com/a57ngel/club/images/heartpath.gif

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

" It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is

essential is invisible to the eye. " Antoine De Saint-Exupery

Political animated comics:

http://www.markfiore.com/animation/stay.html

________________________________________________________________________________\

____

Looking for last minute shopping deals?

Find them fast with Search.

http://tools.search./newsearch/category.php?category=shopping

[Guest guest]

My daughter uses it on both wrists so the current goes through her

lungs. She got lung infections before using this. but she uses 6

volts dc current instead of the beck ac type, 4 hertz.

that's her.

I use a wrist device consisting of 3 rechargeable AAA's, I'm sitting

with it on one wrist only. it's 3.6 volts and I reverse it about

halfway through a 1 hour session. It's so mild i hardly feel it, and

it just barely leaves any mark at all,next day fine. I just wet it

with plain tap water. I do this a few days every month or two.

why? well I'm 62, and it seems to remove some prostate irritation

somehow, either by altering the testosterone derivative that might

irritate the prostate, or by killing off some bug, I favor the former

explanation, but who cares, it works.

It works for me and everyone else on my list who tried it and

reported back. The rest were either too shy to mention a failure,

they died from it, or just didn't give a damn to report it back to us.

The point Russ Torlage is making is that some bozo is going to

connect themselves to some device of their own crazy concoction, like

I did at first, and with their pacemaker, use both wrists. People do

things exactly like that. I had heard people putting one electrode

in each ear for an ear infection. And then they wanna use the wall

current and an adapter instead of batteries.

I think Russ has gotta hold some sort of standard line because he

knows people will not think of everything when ill and when doing a

new thing like this. It's very easy to make a whopping mistake. My

first electrifier acted more like a stun gun, it knocked me off my

chair. A later model gave me some 3rd degree burns and scars. And

it's only amusing so far, but it could get sadly serious should

someone with OCD decide to really clean themselves out of germs with

some massive electricity or something stupid like that. I can see

his point.

I would say the blood will get electrified if you put contacts over

veins or arteries, it has to. In my daughter's case the germ is in

the lung, not the blood. So passing current through the lung kills or

at least reduces germs there, hypothetically. It does appear to work

for her and has for years now, no more doctor's visits or antibiotics.

But that's her. It probably is not blood-borne.

Many things like warts and herpes you can just hit directly why

bother your blood?

People are looking for health benefits with this and some have found

it. I have not noticed benefits to health but have been able to

remove infections fairly reliably. That means to use it, I have to

get an infection.

I just got an abcessed tooth, used the electrodes with dc current in

my mouth. After first time, most pain gone the next day. After a few

days of twice a day, gone altogether. One tooth saved from the

drill, so far. It will come back, I know it. But I'll hit it again,

and hopefully will keep the tooth together and use it awhile.

Finally, the root canal will go in. OK, but it could be years from

now, and I'm fine with it. Electrifying my blood would have done

nothing for this. Same with sinus pain. I just made a mask and

attached 4 electrodes and a 6 volt dc battery, voila, no more sinus

problems. My girlfriend did same thing. Now here's a story: she is

an ER NP (nurse practitioner, can prescribe, examine, treat, etc) she

got MRSA (deadly bug, resists antibiotics). I made a sinus mask for

her. She got rid of the MRSA in a week. Never looked or felt

better. She was on various drugs and antibiotics of every

description for this over several years to no avail. Her whole

facial aspect changed and she looks radiant compared to how she

looked before. She keeps a 6 volt batter with a wire and two sponges

attached to the ends on her desk in the ER in case of exposure she

nips it in the bud right there. sounds simple, too good to be true,

wake up it's here and you can just do it. But to really do it, you

need to get yourself an infection. Most of you don't really have

one. You'd have no problem if you did and used the 6 volt battery,

wire and sponges idea. Good luck finding health benefits with this.

But it's a dandy infection destroyer. Thanks to Beck and in

particular to Forrest for point out the DC current thing and

being so innovative around it. Both men have changed the world in my

view. I now have 3200 + members in my group, and hundreds of reports

on many diseases accumulated from using very simple battery devices

made in minutes right at home.

bG

>

> I'm sorry but my understanding is that is how Beck was

> doing it in the beginning (after first starting with

> the ankles) and then just made an allowance to do it

> on one wrist for convenience sake. I see no good

> reason for not using both wrists. I did it that way

> for years with no problems. Most of my customers did

> it that way also with never a complaint. I don't

> believe it is bad for the heart IF in fact it actually

> goes thru it. Knowing that electricity always takes

> the path of least resistance there is no reason for

> the current to take a detour down into the heart,

> swirl around and affect as much of it as possible, and

> then get back into the main artery toward the opposite

> electrode. If they use one wrist then it is unknown

> how much electrical current just crosses the 2 inch

> distance to the other electrode without coursing thru

> the arteries blood. Even better than using 2 wrists is

> using 2 ankles because the blood volume in the legs

> arteries is even more, so more blood would be

> affected. That is how I zap myself now. I set my unit

> on 10 hertz and go to sleep with it on me.

> Look at this picture of the heart. You see how the

> blue and red arteries have their red-to-red and

> blue-to-blue above the heart? That's where the

> electrical current would be flowing thru, not down

> into the heart which would be a less direct path to

> the opposite electrode.

>

>

>

______________________________________________________________________

______________

> Looking for last minute shopping deals?

> Find them fast with Search.

http://tools.search./newsearch/category.php?category=shopping

>

[Guest guest]

Perfectly said Bob....:>)

> >

> > I'm sorry but my understanding is that is how Beck was

> > doing it in the beginning (after first starting with

> > the ankles) and then just made an allowance to do it

> > on one wrist for convenience sake. I see no good

> > reason for not using both wrists. I did it that way

> > for years with no problems. Most of my customers did

> > it that way also with never a complaint. I don't

> > believe it is bad for the heart IF in fact it actually

> > goes thru it. Knowing that electricity always takes

> > the path of least resistance there is no reason for

> > the current to take a detour down into the heart,

> > swirl around and affect as much of it as possible, and

> > then get back into the main artery toward the opposite

> > electrode. If they use one wrist then it is unknown

> > how much electrical current just crosses the 2 inch

> > distance to the other electrode without coursing thru

> > the arteries blood. Even better than using 2 wrists is

> > using 2 ankles because the blood volume in the legs

> > arteries is even more, so more blood would be

> > affected. That is how I zap myself now. I set my unit

> > on 10 hertz and go to sleep with it on me.

> > Look at this picture of the heart. You see how the

> > blue and red arteries have their red-to-red and

> > blue-to-blue above the heart? That's where the

> > electrical current would be flowing thru, not down

> > into the heart which would be a less direct path to

> > the opposite electrode.

> >

> >

> >

>

_____________________________________________________________________

_

> ______________

> > Looking for last minute shopping deals?

> > Find them fast with Search.

> http://tools.search./newsearch/category.php?

category=shopping

> >

>

[Guest guest]

I was cruising through old messages and found this one that intrigued

me... and I have to make a reply. In reading this, I am a bit

confused as to what is going on; the writer describes the current

" coursing through the lungs " or whatever. Now, as I understood Bob

Beck in his 2-hour lecture in 1997 which I came across accidentally a

few weeks ago on YouTube.com, the point of wearing the blood-purifier,

or blood electrifier, or whatever you want to call it, is that the

current cleans the blood AS IT (the blood) COURSES UNDER THE

ELECTRODES, not that the current courses through the body. I admit I

am not terribly smart in the realm of electricity, and I do know that

electricity can follow a path... but which is it?

I thought the point of it being such a tiny current (about 50

micro-amperes) is that it will just barely get through the 7 layers of

tissue to the bloodstream in the radial and ulnar arteries. Not that

the current would TRAVEL the whole bloodstream through the body.

Please, anybody have anything to add?

Joan

> > >

> > > I'm sorry but my understanding is that is how Beck was

> > > doing it in the beginning (after first starting with

> > > the ankles) and then just made an allowance to do it

> > > on one wrist for convenience sake. I see no good

> > > reason for not using both wrists. I did it that way

> > > for years with no problems. Most of my customers did

> > > it that way also with never a complaint. I don't

> > > believe it is bad for the heart IF in fact it actually

> > > goes thru it. Knowing that electricity always takes

> > > the path of least resistance there is no reason for

> > > the current to take a detour down into the heart,

> > > swirl around and affect as much of it as possible, and

> > > then get back into the main artery toward the opposite

> > > electrode. If they use one wrist then it is unknown

> > > how much electrical current just crosses the 2 inch

> > > distance to the other electrode without coursing thru

> > > the arteries blood. Even better than using 2 wrists is

> > > using 2 ankles because the blood volume in the legs

> > > arteries is even more, so more blood would be

> > > affected. That is how I zap myself now. I set my unit

> > > on 10 hertz and go to sleep with it on me.

> > > Look at this picture of the heart. You see how the

> > > blue and red arteries have their red-to-red and

> > > blue-to-blue above the heart? That's where the

> > > electrical current would be flowing thru, not down

> > > into the heart which would be a less direct path to

> > > the opposite electrode.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> >

> _____________________________________________________________________

> _

> > ______________

> > > Looking for last minute shopping deals?

> > > Find them fast with Search.

> > http://tools.search./newsearch/category.php?

> category=shopping

> > >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

She had one electrode on the left wrist and one electrode on the right wrist. So the electricity followed a path through both arms, across the chest and down the other arm. Bob Beck never used this method. barbalsjoannie <alsjoannie@...> wrote: I was cruising through old messages and found this one that intriguedme... and I have to make a reply. In reading this, I am a bitconfused as to what is going on; the writer describes the current"coursing through the lungs" or whatever.

Now, as I understood BobBeck in his 2-hour lecture in 1997 which I came across accidentally afew weeks ago on YouTube.com, the point of wearing the blood-purifier,or blood electrifier, or whatever you want to call it, is that thecurrent cleans the blood AS IT (the blood) COURSES UNDER THEELECTRODES, not that the current courses through the body. I admit Iam not terribly smart in the realm of electricity, and I do know thatelectricity can follow a path... but which is it? I thought the point of it being such a tiny current (about 50micro-amperes) is that it will just barely get through the 7 layers oftissue to the bloodstream in the radial and ulnar arteries. Not thatthe current would TRAVEL the whole bloodstream through the body. Please, anybody have anything to add? Joan> > >> > > I'm sorry but my understanding is that is how Beck was> > > doing it in the beginning (after first starting with> > > the ankles) and then just made an allowance to do it> > > on one wrist for convenience sake. I see no good> > > reason for not using both wrists. I did it that way> > > for years with no problems.

Most of my customers did> > > it that way also with never a complaint. I don't> > > believe it is bad for the heart IF in fact it actually> > > goes thru it. Knowing that electricity always takes> > > the path of least resistance there is no reason for> > > the current to take a detour down into the heart,> > > swirl around and affect as much of it as possible, and> > > then get back into the main artery toward the opposite> > > electrode. If they use one wrist then it is unknown> > > how much electrical current just crosses the 2 inch> > > distance to the other electrode without coursing thru> > > the arteries blood. Even better than using 2 wrists is> > > using 2 ankles because the blood volume in the legs> > > arteries is even more, so more blood would be> > > affected. That is how I zap

myself now. I set my unit> > > on 10 hertz and go to sleep with it on me.> > > Look at this picture of the heart. You see how the> > > blue and red arteries have their red-to-red and> > > blue-to-blue above the heart? That's where the> > > electrical current would be flowing thru, not down> > > into the heart which would be a less direct path to> > > the opposite electrode.> > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________________> _> > ______________> > > Looking for last minute shopping deals? > > > Find them fast with Search. > > http://tools.search./newsearch/category.php?> category=shopping> >

>> >>

[Guest guest]

I am pretty certain that Bob Beck mentioned this technique once in

one of his

lectures, but did not recommend it. This, for obvious reasons: If

you have

a sensitivity to it, it could be damaging. However , I have used it

and certainly, it works. As the previous writer suggested, it probably

is getting rid of more pathogens since it plays on a larger area. One

thing for certain, when you hook it up to opposite wrists, you still

feel it quite strongly. Therefore, this small low frequency current

is making its way through the bloodstream effectively.

alsjoannie <alsjoannie >

wrote:

I was cruising through old messages and found this one that intrigued

me... and I have to make a reply. In reading this, I am a bit

confused as to what is going on; the writer describes the current

"coursing through the lungs" or whatever. Now, as I understood Bob

Beck in his 2-hour lecture in 1997 which I came across accidentally a

few weeks ago on YouTube.com, the point of wearing the blood-purifier,

or blood electrifier, or whatever you want to call it, is that the

current cleans the blood AS IT (the blood) COURSES UNDER THE

ELECTRODES, not that the current courses through the body. I admit I

am not terribly smart in the realm of electricity, and I do know that

electricity can follow a path... but which is it?

I thought the point of it being such a tiny current (about 50

micro-amperes) is that it will just barely get through the 7 layers of

tissue to the bloodstream in the radial and ulnar arteries. Not that

the current would TRAVEL the whole bloodstream through the body.

Please, anybody have anything to add?

Joan

[Guest guest]

How has it helped you?I was cruising through old messages and found this one that intriguedme... and I have to make a reply. In reading this, I am a bitconfused as to what is going on; the writer describes the

current"coursing through the lungs" or whatever. Now, as I understood BobBeck in his 2-hour lecture in 1997 which I came across accidentally afew weeks ago on YouTube.com, the point of wearing the blood-purifier,or blood electrifier, or whatever you want to call it, is that thecurrent cleans the blood AS IT (the blood) COURSES UNDER THEELECTRODES, not that the current courses through the body. I admit Iam not terribly smart in the realm of electricity, and I do know thatelectricity can follow a path... but which is it? I thought the point of it being such a tiny current (about 50micro-amperes) is that it will just barely get through the 7 layers oftissue to the bloodstream in the radial and ulnar arteries. Not thatthe current would TRAVEL the whole bloodstream through the body. Please, anybody have anything to add? Joan

[Guest guest]

I do not have any health problems

that I am aware of, so maybe. :0)

However, it has helped my dog. It has reduced his tumor by 50% in

about two weeks. Assuming that it is malignant (I am told that benign

tumors are nearly impossible to reduce), it may prolong his life for

quite awhile. Since he is a 15 year old Golden Retriever, it would be

a miracle if he lives another two years, but at least he has a

chance. One thing for certain, it does not bother him at all... he

sleeps right through treatments.

[Guest guest]

Yes Yes if you get a response in your fingers you are on target. Did

you get the ozone maker also. I got that first and found that my

energy picked up right away. I started the rest about three weeks

later. How is your reaction to it? How long are you able to do it for.

I could only do 20 minutes at first. It is always great to hear

someone else give it a try. Let us know how it goes.

>

> Any assistance is greatful....

>

> just started the Bob Beck protocol THIS week and question is....

>

> ANY tips on LOCATING the pulse points for the Arteries?

>

> I notice that when i place the electrodes over where i THINK the pulse

> should be on the wrists...my hand and fingers twitch in time to the

> alternating pulse....Q: is THIS a good indication that i HAVE found

> the correct positions or any other suggestions...I want to be doing

> this correctly..

>

> thanks in advance.

>