Guest guest Posted January 5, 2008 Report Share Posted January 5, 2008 I am a cancer survivor and am fighting metastatic cancer at this time. I have been reading the posts from this group for several weeks. Does anyone have any information on how these therapies work for cancer patients? I have only had surgery (8 years ago), then used natural means to fight the cancer, mostly diet and supplements. MMS interests me. How does it differ from herbal cleanses? Is it more effective? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 5, 2008 Report Share Posted January 5, 2008 MMS is a very powerful molocule that kills all pathogens( viruses, fungus parasite and bad bacteris)It is very safe and has even been recomended by the goverment to give to livestock to kill germs that infect our food supply. this is how you take it: http://www.miraclemineral.org/importantinfo.php#q2 This is where to order it: http://MmsMiracle.com/boondoc hear is another great site from a person producing a DVD about it and its Discoverer. http://phaelosopher.wordpress.com/2007/09/09/no-miracle-just- wonderful-chemistry/ I started taking it Christmas Day 2007 and have started noticing many changes. breathing better, circulating getting better, more stamina doing anything, arthritis gone, and others. So far it is the least expensive thing I have found an quickest acting. I am helping others with it and cancer (stage 4) and with doing Beck at the same time. I would highly recomend it of anyone that wants to get and stay healthy. Jim > > I am a cancer survivor and am fighting metastatic cancer at this time. > I have been reading the posts from this group for several weeks. Does > anyone have any information on how these therapies work for cancer > patients? I have only had surgery (8 years ago), then used natural > means to fight the cancer, mostly diet and supplements. > > MMS interests me. How does it differ from herbal cleanses? Is it more > effective? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 5, 2008 Report Share Posted January 5, 2008 www.cancertutor.com talks about the beck protocol and it's role in fighting cancer. > fighting cancer > > > I am a cancer survivor and am fighting metastatic cancer at this time. > I have been reading the posts from this group for several weeks. Does > anyone have any information on how these therapies work for cancer > patients? I have only had surgery (8 years ago), then used natural > means to fight the cancer, mostly diet and supplements. > > MMS interests me. How does it differ from herbal cleanses? Is it more > effective? > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 6, 2008 Report Share Posted January 6, 2008 I looked under MMS and this is what I found: Miracle Mineral Solution is a 28% solution of sodium chlorite in distilled water. And this is what I found on Sodium Chlorite: Sodium chlorite is a compound used for water disinfection and purification. It is produced in large quantities as flakes or a solution from chlorine dioxide and sodium hydroxide. Its use as a bleach for textiles was first discovered during the 1920s. Today, sodium chlorite is an important specialty chemical with sales over $18 million annually. In its dried state, sodium chlorite (NaClO2) is a white or light yellow-green solid. The greenish tint comes from trace amounts of CdO2 or iron, which are production residuals. Sodium chlorite has a molecular weight of 90.44 and decomposes at about 392°F (200°C). It is generally soluble in water, but its solubility increases as the temperature of the water rises. Sodium chlorite is a powerful oxidizer that will not explode on percussion. The anhydrous salt does not absorb water and is stable for up to ten years. Sodium chlorite is used for a variety of applications. It is used as a disinfectant and purification chemical for water. It is also employed as a textile-bleaching and water anti-fouling agent. Additionally, it is used in the paper and electronics manufacturing industries as a bleaching agent. When put in an acid solution, sodium chlorite breaks down into chlorine dioxide. When added to a municipal water supply, chlorine dioxide helps control unwanted tastes and odors. It also aids in the removal of ions like iron and manganese. One added benefit is that it helps eliminate trihalomethanes in drinking water. As a textile-bleaching agent, sodium chlorite is effective with various fibers. It can be used on cotton, bast fibers, and man-made fibers like nylon, Perlon, Dralon, and Rhovyl. It has an oxidizing effect on many of the natural waxes and pectins found in cellulose fibers. It helps solubilize them and makes the fiber more even and workable. It has the added benefit of destroying natural color matter without attacking the fibers themselves. This makes it useful for making permanent white fabrics without compromising tensile strength. Sodium chlorite is also used for various industrial applications. It controls microbial contamination in industrial cooling systems and towers. It is used in place of chlorine in industrial ammonia plants because it does not react negatively with ammonia. Since it is an oxidizer, it is often a part of flue gas scrubber systems. Food-processing companies use it for washing fruits and vegetables because it is a fungicide. Meat and poultry are also washed with a solution, as is food processing equipment. Finally, it is an anti-mildew agent in detergent compositions and has been used in toothpaste and contact lens solutions. > > > > I am a cancer survivor and am fighting metastatic cancer at this > time. > > I have been reading the posts from this group for several weeks. > Does > > anyone have any information on how these therapies work for cancer > > patients? I have only had surgery (8 years ago), then used natural > > means to fight the cancer, mostly diet and supplements. > > > > MMS interests me. How does it differ from herbal cleanses? Is it > more > > effective? > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 7, 2008 Report Share Posted January 7, 2008 Yes Achoo, your research is correct, but you have apparently neglected to look into what Jim Humble has discovered and how he came about his discovery. The conventional use of Sodium chlorite that you report is what led to his discovery, However, this is not what you should be interested in here. While there is evidence that pockets of people have used sodium chlorite for health issues in the past, what Jim has brought to the table is extraordinary and must not be dismissed lightly. In fact, if sodium chlorite happened to cost twenty times what it currently does, it would still be a steal given the properties that Jim has discovered. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 7, 2008 Report Share Posted January 7, 2008 Jim , Great responce, and very well worded. tankyou, Jim Stanley, M.D. (retired) > > Yes Achoo, your research is correct, but you have apparently neglected > to look into what Jim Humble has discovered and how he came about his > discovery. The conventional use of Sodium chlorite that you report is > what led to his discovery, However, this is not what you should be > interested in here. While there is evidence that pockets of people have > used sodium chlorite for health issues in the past, what Jim has > brought to the table is extraordinary and must not be dismissed > lightly. In fact, if sodium chlorite happened to cost twenty times > what it currently does, it would still be a steal given the properties > that Jim has discovered. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 30, 2008 Report Share Posted April 30, 2008 Anyone keeping up on the outcomes of recent clinical trials for Intravenous Vitamin C. Here's some valuable information. Joe C. http://www.lef.org/newsletter/2008/0104_clinical-trial-vitamin-c-non-hodgkin-lym\ phoma.htm?source=eNewsLetter2008Wk1-2 & key=Article+Exclusive & l=0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 30, 2008 Report Share Posted April 30, 2008 To me one of the 'telling' parts of the e-mail pertained to the fact that when radiation exposure is experienced for treatment of 'other' cancers there is a risk and also for certain chemical exposure. Here is the part that reveals this: " Prior radiation treatment for other cancers, family history of related conditions, damage to the lymphatic system and exposure to certain chemicals may increase the risk " What they didn't say, but is obvious, is that radiation is risky and what about CT-Scans that can equal the exposure of upwards of 100 chest X-Rays. Don't you think this is a big risk and how much more when one has ongoing Scans or other X-Ray examinations? Joe C. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.