Re:Miracle Mineral Supplement (NaClO2) Sodium Hypochlorite

[Guest guest]

The metabolite of Ozone is hydrogen peroxide and the metabolite of

H2O2 is hypo chlorous acid (created by myeloperoxidase).

The Chlorine dioxide metabolite is also hypochlorous acid... so it

seems they may share the same metabolic pathways.

This would be a good thing as the body has strong protection against

H2O2 which is used for waste disposal in the body (in peroxisomes).

The other thing is that Ozone/H2O2 is a much stronger oxidant and

ClO2 a much more gentle one... although ClO2 has more oxidising

potential (has more electrons available): more gentle is a good thing

usually.

From everything I can find out it appears that MMS's action is very

closely related to that of Ozone.

Remember we're talking very dilute solutions of MMS and the protocol

is identical to the ozone protocol (start with 1 drop and work up to

15 or so).

Oxidants are very good at metabolising many toxins... and bugs

definitely don't like them either... so the treatment is likely to

work. Trialing it against H2O2 is a simple way to check efficiency.

As for the efficiency of MMS with various blood borne parasites... a

simple examination under a microscope would show any major

improvements... so it's not really all that hard to objectively

measure a change. Certainly not a placebo effect as parasites don't

believe in placebo's.

If anyone can fill that in a bit more please feel free.

>

> I would be fairly sceptical about the use of Chlorine Dioxide. I

would have thought it is fairly likely to kill off all bacteria both

good and bad. That might be OK for swimming pools or water tanks, but

not so good inside body.

> Also with regard to the curing of malaria in Africa, anyone who

knows anything about Africa will know that patients there are far

more likely to say what will please the other person (ie the person

administering the cure) than in the weastern world. The patient might

even convince himself he is better (placebo effect) for a while only

to experience a later relapse.

> I'm not a great believer in conventional science, but I would have

thought there ought to be some scientific research into CD already,

which might shed a bit more light on the matter.

> Regards

> Pat

>