Guest guest Posted October 25, 2004 Report Share Posted October 25, 2004 People often refer to " extremism " on this list, and " extreme CR " or " extreme CRON " is typically condemned. Still, I'm not sure what this means. Is getting a very low level of calories " extreme CR " ? If so, where's the cutoff point? Would it be 1,500 for men? 1,000 for women? Wouldn't it have to depend on your height and weight, along with the rate at which you typically lose weight? Is eliminating a whole food group " extreme CR " ? If so, then are all vegans and vegetarians on this list doing " extreme CR " ? Do we really want to label vegetarians " extremists " ? I wouldn't. (Note that I myself will eat almost anything, with the exception of things I simply can't stomach or products containing trans-fats or too much saturated fat. The quantity of " borderline " items I consume depends on my assessment of how detrimental they could be to my health.) Besides, CR (or CRON, if you prefer) is not, in my understanding of it, a prescriptive diet. You create your own diet on the basis of principles of optimal or at least adequate nutrition, and you lower your calorie intake by an amount you determine. Naturally, it's best not to give your body a shock by cutting your calories by 50 percent overnight. Is having a very low BMI an automatic determiner of " extreme CR " ? Well, I can think of one individual--who shall remain unnamed--who has, at times, been used on this list as an example of extremism and who does indeed have a very low BMI. But what is someone who begins CR with a low BMI to do, especially if that person truly believes that CR will lead to greater health and longevity? Just give up on the idea entirely, because CR will lead to an even lower BMI? That doesn't seem a reasonable recommendation. Is pushing CR to the point of doing damage to one's health what you would call " extreme CR " ? That sounds more reasonable, but one plausible explanation is that anyone who does so has simply practiced CR badly and may since have recognized the error of his or her ways. It's a tricky thing, after all. Why else would there be so much debate about the benefits of fish, grains, and ALA, just to cite a few examples, if " optimal nutrition " were a clear-cut issue? It is not. The general outlines are more or less clear, but much remains to be learned, as we all know. Therefore, it is absolutely understandable that one may do damage to one's health in the process of doing CR--even without intending to push things to extremes. I am aware of a number of instances of this, and it's something that all CR novices should be aware of. I suppose I might consider the last point to be an example of extreme CR if an individual pushed things to the point of serious health damage and stubbornly refused to change. Still, it might be more accurate to refer to such practices as " eating disorders " or, as the case may be, " anorexia. " So what do you think? Personally, I wonder whether my own CR would be considered " extreme " by some on your list--not that I would feel insulted, mind you. I'll be interested to read people's responses to this topic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.