food is the enemy? (was Re: Dozen eggs a week now safe?)

[Guest guest]

Under nutrition??? Nope not for me. OPTIMAL nutrition or CRON. I hope

what you mean is minimizing your calories, not your nutrients.

on 10/13/2004 2:03 PM, freebird5005 at freebird5005@... wrote:

>

> Yes. it's true food needed for survival..

>

> but each mouthful creates FREE RAD DAMAGE !

>

> I think it a good way to approach the subject of nutrition..

>

> " how much do i need to optimize my chances for survival "

>

> " Under nutrition without mal-nutrition "

[Guest guest]

Correct. I just deplore thinking that food should taste good as a req't for nutrition. That one fact has held back the advance of good diets by the medical world, the excuse being they won't do the diet if it is too "strict" or "spartan". I don't view a lacto veg diet as too strict,eg.

I encourage everyone to do a harris benedict evolution to determine their energy needs.

Regards.

----- Original Message -----

From: Francesca Skelton

Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 12:50 PM

Subject: [ ] food is the enemy? (was Re: Dozen eggs a week now safe?)

I would be careful with this train of thought. This is the kind of statement you might find on an anorexic website.Too much food is the enemy as is too little. Food eaten in moderation and intelligently is needed for survival. Without it we die. No getting around it.on 10/13/2004 1:08 PM, jwwright at jwwright@... wrote:> Agree. I think of food as my enemy and it better do more than taste good. > As Jack LaLanne says:"if it tastes good, don't eat it".>

[Guest guest]

link to harris??

>

> > Agree. I think of food as my enemy and it better do more than

taste good.

> > As Jack LaLanne says: " if it tastes good, don't eat it " .

> >