Guest guest Posted October 13, 2004 Report Share Posted October 13, 2004 Roy Walford coined the term.. malnutrition means " inadequate nutrition " so " undernutrition " obviously cannot mean inadequate. so it must mean at very least " adequate " , right? Adequate for what? for health and longevity ! More is NOT adequate but too much. > > > > > Yes. it's true food needed for survival.. > > > > but each mouthful creates FREE RAD DAMAGE ! > > > > I think it a good way to approach the subject of nutrition.. > > > > " how much do i need to optimize my chances for survival " > > > > " Under nutrition without mal-nutrition " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.