Guest guest Posted November 23, 2004 Report Share Posted November 23, 2004 Hi folks: GOSH. What an interesting table. I have been looking for data like this for a long time! http://www.inra.fr/reseau-nacre/sci-memb/corpet/Data/table.php? file=Potency-Tumors.txt http://snipurl.com/au8f Note, especially, that if you click on an author's name in column 3 you can get the abstract of the corresponding study. Also interesting is that it seems to be saying that butyrate pellets INCREASE tumor incidence. Hmmmmm. Rodney. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 24, 2004 Report Share Posted November 24, 2004 Hi Rodney & thank you for your research. My understanding is that butyrate is (for most part) a naturally byproduct of ingesting fiber. Is that the same as butyrate pellets? Rodney wrote: > http://snipurl.com/au8f > > Also interesting is that it seems to be saying that butyrate pellets > INCREASE tumor incidence. Hmmmmm. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 24, 2004 Report Share Posted November 24, 2004 Hi Apricot: " My understanding is that butyrate is (for most part) a natural byproduct of ingesting fiber. Is that the same as butyrate pellets? " Dunno for sure. But I ASSUMED that it meant the ingestion of butyrate pellets. The reason I noted that item was because it may, possibly, conflict with the view around here that people benefit from butyrate production in the large intestine. I do not have an opinion on that. I just made that comment to draw attention to that particular study in case it has relevance. It may not have, of course. Caveat swallowor. Rodney. > > > http://snipurl.com/au8f > > > > Also interesting is that it seems to be saying that butyrate pellets > > INCREASE tumor incidence. Hmmmmm. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 28, 2007 Report Share Posted January 28, 2007 Hi Bill: As far as I know no one has ever done a study using different doses of aspirin in anticipation of finding varying rates of colon cancer. Rather, these results came from very broad surveys of intakes of stuff (foods, medications, etc.) which then looked for associations between intakes and outcomes for all kinds of diseases. Among their findings it appeared that those reporting having taken aspirin seemed, on average, to have gotten less colon cancer than those who had reported not taking it. But if anyone knows of any such papers, please post them. TIA. Rodney. > > Rodney (or anyone), > > What dose is found in the studies to be prophylactic for colon cancer? > Would you please direct me to these relevant studies? " Low dose " > aspirin = 81 mg. Regular dose = 325mg. Is a daily " low dose " aspirin > sufficient? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.