Re: Keeping HIV under control, new slant

[Guest guest]

If that's so, then inflammation reduction would help a lot too because

inflammation carries with it a Th2 inflammatory response and white blood cells

are involved.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T_helper_cell

Undenatured whey has been used for glutathione increase, which reduces toxins

and protects cells including the white blood cells that are attacked by HIV.

Reduced toxin load reduces oxidative stress and inflammation and this can reduce

white blood cell activity, so meshes with your analysis.

all good,

Duncan

>

> I've just been reading up, and found that something interesting happens when

HIV

> invades a cell: nothing. It splices itself into the DNA of the cell and unless

> the cell " activates " the virus is not reproduced. In other words if there is

no

> need for the cell to do any work fighting an infection, the virus cannot

> multiply.

>

> This has useful implications to anyone wanting to give the best possible

> treatment. The main one is keep the body away from germs, deal with germs

using

> godzilla, beck's protocol, whatever else helps to that end, and use the HIV

meds

> to reduce the virus in addition.

>

> The most likely reason some people go into AIDS quickly and others more slowly

> would seem to be involved at least to some major extent, with how " activated "

> their immune cells become over time.

>

> Beck's protocol has demonstrated its usefulness in AIDS cases, clearing up

OI's

> (opportunistic infections) but it did not rid the person of HIV (nothing else

> has, either). So reducing the virus is the current best case we have.

>

> Many with HIV have reported better health when they did the things like diet,

> exercise, etc which would normally tend to strengthen themselves. It could

very

> well be that by keeping the burden off the immune system, so it remains

dormant

> and does not reproduce the virus, could suppress the replication of the virus.

> This is in addition to what the meds can do for virus already in existence.

>

> I am very convinced of the validity of this, and I see examples in the

> literature of it working this way.

>

> Without the meds, these additional things do not work, the virus begins to

> trigger a large reaction in the immune system, which just makes more virus. So

> meds are needed. But to reduce the overall virus most effectively it makes

> compelling mechanical sense to combine the therapies. By doing so, you remove

> the most virus that is circulating around, plus you quiet down the virus

> factories in the infected cells.

>

> How big an effect? Each infected cell produces hundreds of thousands of new

> virus. Each one is slightly mutated, which is part of the problem for vaccine

> development. Note, it is the cell which makes the virus! It cannot do so

> unless it becomes " activated " . If not activated, it sits there looking normal.

>

> By keeping many of these cells in such a quiet state, they eventually can

> disappear, or become active here and there. But the vastness of the ocean of

> virus in the body would be reduced considerably at the source.

>

> bG

>