Guest guest Posted October 13, 2004 Report Share Posted October 13, 2004 Hi folks: I feel like the guy who said: " If you aren't confused, you simply do not know the facts " . Recently a study, by the same scientist who originally alerted everyone to the PSA test, showed that the PSA test is no longer a sign of prostate cancer, but is simply a measure of the degree of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Now, below, posted by Al, (thanks Al) we see a study which says that having BPH confers 37% protection against prostate cancer. So let's combine those two supposed facts: Logically then, the higher your PSA (i.e. greater your BPH) the LOWER your risk of prostate cancer. Are we really supposed to believe this stuff? Rodney. --- In , " old542000 " <apater@m...> wrote: > > Hi All, > > benign prostatic hyperplasia (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.49-0.81) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.