Guest guest Posted December 1, 2004 Report Share Posted December 1, 2004 Hi All, The pdf-available below to me implicates the effects of CR and the independent of our body mass index (BMI) in insulin level and consequently cancer risk. Breast cancer data is discussed as an example. Are we to believe that the women had calorie intakes of less than 1600 while having only 29% that had a BMI less than 25? Looking at the macronutrient ratios, the % calories across increasing quintiles of calorie intakes, values were fat, 31.57 to 38.69%, protein was 16.1 to 15.5 and carbohydrates was 49.4 to 44.8. Is this not inconsistent with the idea that the current obesity trend in society is due to reduced fat and increased sugars? So why does my sister have breast cancer, and why does it appear to be so serious? She exercises plenty and has a low BMI, and always did. The breast cancer of Greta is now in bone metastases are in her one should blade, back from the neck to tail bone, ribs on both sides, hips and legs. Three years ago: `The initial biopsy revealed a ductal infiltrating right breast carcinoma grade II/III. It was 1.7 cm minimum, had lymphatic invasion and was estrogen receptor 3+, meaning very responsive to estrogen and hence tamoxifen. The tumor was infiltrating ductal carcinoma; local stage T2pN1biii; poorly differentiated, grade III/III; approximately 3.5 cm, having extensive lymphatic invasion; and not completely removed by the surgery. " An ill-defined hard stellate tumour mass, measuring approximately 2.5 x 2.0 x 2.0 cm is present in the inferior central aspect of the specimen. " ' They took the sentinel lymph node, three other separate nodes and a mass containing six nodes. The sentinel node was negative, one of the other nodes had a metastatic infiltrating ductal carcinoma of 1 cm with extra-nodal extension, another node was positive for metastatic infiltrating ductal carcinoma and two separate nodes were negative. I spoke with a pathologist friend and he said they probably got all the lymph nodes out cleanly. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Nov 15;22(22):4507-13. Insulin, physical activity, and caloric intake in postmenopausal women: breast cancer implications. Chlebowski RT, Pettinger M, Stefanick ML, BV, Mossavar- Rahmani Y, McTiernan A. .... programs to reduce body mass index (BMI) with... decreased caloric intake have been proposed to reduce insulin as a potential mediator of breast cancer and other chronic diseases. .... An ethnically diverse subsample of 2,996 mostly healthy postmenopausal women with no prior cancer history was randomly identified from the 161,809 participants ... insulin levels were then compared across quintiles of caloric intake and physical activity in linear regression model analyses controlled for BMI and other factors. RESULTS: Lower BMI (P < ..0001), higher levels of physical activity (P < .0001), and lower caloric intake (P < .02) were all independently associated with significantly lower mean fasting insulin levels throughout the range of observed values. Insulin levels of 8.74 microU/mL +/- 4.16 SD were seen in the highest physical activity and lowest caloric intake quintile compared with insulin levels of 15.08 microU/mL +/- 16.32 SD in the lowest physical activity and highest caloric intake quintile (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that reduction in BMI achieved by increasing physical activity, reducing caloric intake, or both, should lower insulin levels, providing support for clinical trials evaluating insulin level change and breast cancer risk. PMID: 15542801 [PubMed - in process] INTRODUCTION Obesity 1,2 and low physical activity 3,4 have each been associated with increased breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women, whereas caloric restriction has been linked to lower breast cancer incidence.5 Higher fasting insulin levels has been proposed as a potential mediating factor of these observations because higher insulin levels are associated with obesity 6 and low phys-ical activity.7 Therefore, weight loss pro- grams incorporating both increased physical activity and decreased caloric in-take, as well as exercise programs without emphasis on weight loss, have been pro-posed as strategies to reduce risk of breast cancer.8,9 However, the relative contributions of body mass index (BMI), caloric intake, and physical activity on insulin levels in postmeno-pausal women have received limited attention and are poorly understood. ... questionaire ... RESULTS Study population age and characteristics are listed in Table 1. The study population was ethnically diverse, with more than 70% overweight or obese. The demographic and cate-gorizing information of women in the various caloric intake and physical activity quintiles were similar (data not shown). Macronutrient intake by quintile of total caloric intake is listed in Table 2. The intakes of fat, protein, and carbohy-drate were each closely correlated with total caloric intake (Spearman correlation coefficients of 0.90, 0.88, and 0.90 respectively). When macronutrient intake was tested for trend by quintile of total caloric intake, a statistically signif- icant (P < .0001) increasing trend in percentage of calo-ries from fat was seen with increasing total calories and a statistically significant inverse (P < .0001) trend was seen between percentage of calories from protein and carbo-hydrates with total calories (Table 2). Thus, as caloric intake increased, the percentage of calories from fat in- creased and the percentage of calories from protein and carbohydrate decreased. Fasting insulin levels by BMI category (normal, over-weight, and obese) and physical activity and caloric intake quintiles are listed in Table 3. Lower insulin levels were seen in women with lower BMI, higher levels of physical activity, and lower caloric intake. BMI (P < .0001), physical activity (P < .0001), and caloric intake (P < .0001) were all signif- icantly associated with insulin levels after adjustment for race or ethnicity, age, smoking, alcohol intake, and study component. In addition, regression models were conducted that serially excluded consideration of one of the three covari-ates (caloric intake, physical activity, or BMI). In all three models the two remaining covariates were significantly associ-ated with insulin levels (P < .005, data not shown). The associations among insulin level with quintiles of physical activity and caloric intake are listed in Tables 4 and 5. The mean in each of the 25 cells in Table 4 is based on values from 90 to 141 women. As shown, high physical activity was associated with lower insulin levels in all quin-tiles of caloric intake. Similarly, low caloric intake was asso-ciated with lower insulin levels in all quintiles of physical activity. Mean fasting insulin ranged from 8.74 microU/mL +/- 4.16 SD in the highest physical activity and lowest caloric intake quintile to 15.08 microU/mL =/- 16.32 SD in the lowest physical activity and highest caloric intake quintile. Figure 1 plots the difference between the mean insulin level in the lowest caloric intake and highest physical activity quintile and all other quintile categories. No interaction was seen with respect to the association of lower insulin levels with lower caloric intake and with higher physical activity, indi-cating that the relationship of physical activity to insulin level is the same in each quintile of caloric intake examined. Similar, but less strong, trends for associations among insu-lin level with physical activity and caloric intake quintiles were seen in each of the three categories of BMI, but power was limited by the smaller sample size. A final regression model examined relationships among BMI, physical activity, and caloric intake with insu-lin levels. Higher physical activity and lower caloric intake were each associated with significantly lower mean fasting insulin levels independent of BMI. The linear regression model revealed a highly significant association (P =.0001, 4 degrees of freedom test) between insulin level and the phys-ical activity quintiles, after adjustment for total caloric in-take and the remaining covariates. Caloric intake was also significantly associated with insulin levels in the same model (P = .021). Similar results were seen when BMI was considered as a categoric variable instead of a log-transformed variable. The analyses were essentially un-changed if body weight was substituted for BMI (data not shown). Interactions among physical activity, caloric in-take, and BMI were evaluated in models adjusted for age, smoking, race or ethnicity, alcohol, and WHI study compo-nent: for BMI and physical activity interaction, P =.18; for physical activity and caloric intake interaction, P = .82. BMI was significantly associated with caloric intake, P = .01. There was no interaction with race (P = .73). DISCUSSION In a large cohort of postmenopausal women, lower BMI, higher levels of physical activity, and lower caloric intake were all independently related to lower fasting insulin levels. In analyses controlled for BMI, lower caloric intake and higher physical activity were independently associated with significantly lower fasting insulin levels throughout the entire range of observed values. Small, short-term randomized trials of modest 7 or rel-atively intense exercise 15,16 and/or weight loss with 16 or without 17 exercise or reduction in total fat and refined carbohydrate intake 18 have in general 15-17 reported insulin reduction with exercise or weight loss. These studies have rarely examined the influence of modest changes in physical activity or caloric intake or the relative contribution of these interventions to insulin change. The current results from a large population of predominantly inactive postmeno-pausal women suggest that even relatively modest increases in physical activity or decreases in caloric intake could con-tribute to lower insulin levels. The actual amount of recreational physical activity re-ported by this cohort of postmenopausal women was quite low. No recreational or walking physical activity whatsoever was reported by one fifth of the women. The fourth most active quintile (with 8.75 to 17.5 kcal/wk/kg of recreational energy expenditure) represents about only 28 min/wk of brisk walking equivalent. Despite this narrow range of rec-reational physical activity differences, insulin levels were approximately 40% lower in the highest physical activity and lowest caloric intake compared with the lowest physical activity and highest caloric intake groups. Reduced caloric intake and increased physical activity are now recognized cornerstones of effective weight loss strategies.19,20 Given that higher insulin levels have been proposed as a potential mediator of an increased risk of two of the three most common malignancies in postmeno-pausal women, namely breast cancer and colorectal can-cer, 21 these findings support consideration of a weight loss strategy for cancer risk reduction trials. A comprehensive review of insulin and cancer risk is beyond the scope of this report. Although not without controversy,22-24 the preponderance of studies suggest that insulin may influence cancers that are more commonly seen in Western populations.21,25 In breast cancer case-control studies, Brunning et al 26 reported a dose-response between c-peptide, a marker of pancreatic insulin secretion, and breast cancer in both pre- and postmenopausal women. Del Giudice et al 27 related higher insulin levels to premeno-pausal breast cancer risk, whereas Yang et al 28 found an increased breast cancer risk with increasing levels of c-peptide as well. More recently, Hirose et al 29 reported insulin levels as significant predictors of postmenopausal breast cancer and a high ratio of c-peptide to fructosamine, suggestive of insulin resistance, was significantly related to both breast hyperplasia and breast cancer incidence in an-other case-control analysis.30 In a cross-sectional study in-volving 3,868 postmenopausal women with 151 prevalent breast cancers, hyperinsulinemia was positively associated with breast cancer risk, an association unaltered by consid-eration of BMI.31 A related parameter, higher fasting glu-cose, has been associated with breast cancer risk in a prospective study.32 Most recently, in a large cohort of 38,823 Norwegian women, low serum high-density li-poprotein cholesterol, described by the authors as part of the metabolic syndrome, was associated with increased postmenopausal breast cancer risk.33 Other studies suggest interaction between insulin and other breast cancer risk factors. An analysis from 400 case-control pairs from the Shanghai Breast Cancer Study suggested that insulin resistance and insulin-like growth factors may synergistically increase breast cancer risk,34 whereas Yu et al 35 reported a synergistic effect on breast cancer risk for insulin-like growth factor-I with hormones estrone or testosterone in both pre and postmenopausal women. The associations seen among physical activity, caloric intake, and insulin have relevance for women with estab-lished cancers as well. In a population of 535 newly diag-nosed breast cancer patients, both higher fasting insulin levels and obesity independently predicted increased recur-rence risk and decreased survival.36 This observation was supported by Borugian et al,37 who reported that high levels of insulin were associated with significantly worse survival in a cohort of 603 breast cancer patients. Most recently, a moderate increase in physical activity has been associated with reduced recurrence risk in women diagnosed with breast cancer in the Nurses Health Study cohort.38 Other studies support the association of body weight with clinical outcome in women with breast cancer. In a recent review, a statistically significant association between obesity and recurrence or survival was seen in 26 of 34 studies.9 In an earlier meta-analysis, the hazard ratio for effect of body weight on recurrence was 1.78 (95% CI, 1.50 to 2.11).8 Most recently, Dignam et al 39 reported a signifi-cant increase in all-cause mortality comparing obese versus nonobese breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant tamox-ifen therapy. Similarity, in International Breast Cancer Study Group Trials involving 6,792 breast cancer patients, BMI significantly influenced overall survival (P = .03), but not disease-free survival.40 The strengths of this report include the large number of fasting blood samples from a study population with a di-verse racial or ethnic and age composition, and the ability to evaluate modest differences in caloric intake and physical activity using standardized data collection instruments and procedures. The cross-sectional design is a limitation pre-cluding causal conclusions. Given the close correlation of all macronutrient intakes with total caloric intake, the relative contribution of individual macronutrients to the insulin levels differences cannot be separated. In summary, the results of this study suggest that strat-egies to reduce BMI and body weight involving either or both increasing physical activity and decreasing caloric in-take will reduce insulin levels. These observations support prospective intervention trials incorporating these lifestyle changes to test hypotheses relating insulin to cancer risk. Consultant/Advisory Role: Rowan T. Chlebowski, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Pfizer. Hon-oraria: Rowan T. Chlebowski, AstraZeneca. REFERENCES 1. Calle EE, C, -Thurmond K, et al: Overweight, obesity, and mortality from cancer in a prospectively studied cohort of U.S. adults. N Engl J Med 348:1625-1638, 2003 2. Petrelli JM, Calle EE, C, et al: Body mass index, height, and postmenopausal breast cancer mortality in a prospective cohort of U.S. women. Cancer Causes Control 13:325- 332, 2002 3. McTiernan A, berg C, White E, et al: Recreational physical activity and the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. JAMA 290:1331-1337, 2003 4. Thune I, Brenn T, Lund E, et al: Physical activity and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 336:1269-1275, 1997 5. Michels KB, Ekbom A: Caloric restriction and incidence of breast cancer. JAMA 291:1226- 1230, 2004 6. M: Obesity, insulin resistance, and its link to non-insulin-dependent diabetes melli-tus. Metabolism 44:18-20, 1995 (suppl 3) 7. Duncan GE, Perri MG, Theriaque DW, et al: Exercise training, without weight loss, in-creases insulin sensitivity and postheparin plasma lipase activity in previously sedentary adults. Diabetes Care 26:557-562, 2003 8. Goodwin PJ, Boyd NF: Body size and breast cancer prognosis: A critical review of the evidence. Breast Cancer Res Treat 16:205-214, 1990 9. Chlebowski RT, Aiello E, McTiernan A: Weight loss in breast cancer patient manage-ment. J Clin Oncol 20:1128-1143, 2002 10. The Women's Heath Initiative Study Group: Design of the Women's Health Initiative Clinical Trial and Observational Study. Control Clin Trials 19:61-109, 1998 11. Writing Group for the Women's Health Initiative: Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: Principal results from the Women's Health Initia-tive. JAMA 288:321-333, 2002 12. Langer RD, White E, CE, et al: The Women's Health Initiative observational study: Baseline characteristics of participants and reli-ability of baseline measures. Ann Epidemiol 13: S107-S121, 2003 13. RE, Kristal AR, Tinker LF, et al: Measurement characteristics of the Women's Health Initiative food frequency questionnaire. Ann Epidemiol 9:178-187, 1999 14. Tietz NW: Fundamentals of Clinical Chem-istry (ed 3). Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, 1987, pp 544 15. Fairey AS, Courneya KS, Field CJ, et al: Effects of exercise training on fasting insulin, insulin resistance, insulin-like growth factors, and insulin-like growth factor binding proteins in postmenopausal breast cancer survivors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12:721-727, 2003 16. Watkins LL, Sherwood A, Feinglos M, et al: Effects of exercise and weight loss on cardiac risk factors associated with syndrome X. Arch Intern Med 63:1889-1895, 2003 17. Goodpaster BH, Kelley DE, Wing RR, et al: Effects of weight loss on regional fat distribution and insulin sensitivity in obesity. Diabetes 48: 839-847, 1999 18. Kaaks R, Bellati C, Venturelli E, et al: Effects of dietary intervention on IGF-I and IGF-binding proteins, and related alterations in sex steroid metabolism: The Diet and Androgens (DIANA) Randomised Trial. Eur J Clin Nutr 57: 1079-1088, 2003 19. National Institutes of Health: The Practical Guide: Identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults—Report of the National Institutes of Health NHLBI obesity education initiative and NAASCO. National Insti-tutes of Health, Washington, DC, 1998, p 17. http: //www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines /obesity/ practgde.htm 20. Stefanick ML. Obesity: Role of physical activity, in Coulston AM, Rock CL, Monsen ER (eds): Nutrition in the Prevention and Treatment of Disease. San Diego, CA, Academic Press, 2001, pp 481-497 21. Giovannucci E: Nutrition, insulin, insulin-like growth factors and cancer. Horm Metab Res 35:694-704, 2003 22. Renehan AG, Zwahlen M, Minder C, et al: Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I, IGF binding protein-3 and cancer risk: Systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Lancet 363:1346- 1353, 2004 23. Mink PJ, Shahar E, mond WD, et al: Serum insulin and glucose levels and breast cancer incidence: The atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Am J Epidemiol 156:349- 352, 2002 24. Jernstrom H, Barrett-Connor E: Obesity, weight change, fasting insulin, proinsulin, C-peptide, and insulin-like growth factor-1 levels in women with and without breast cancer: The Rancho Ber-nardo Study. J Womens Health Gend Based Med 8:1265-1272, 1999 25. Rose DP, Komninou D, son GD: Obesity, adipocytokines and insulin resistance in breast cancer. Obes Rev 5:153-165, 2004 26. Brunning PF, Banfer JMG, van Noord PAH: Insulin resistance and breast cancer risk. Int J Cancer 52:511-516, 1992 27. Del Giudice ME, Fantus IG, Ezzat S, et al: Insulin and related factors in premenopausal breast cancer risk. Breast Cancer Res Treat 47:111-120, 1998 28. Yang G, Lu G, Jin F, et al: Population-based, case-control study of blood C-peptide level and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 10:1207-1211, 2001 29. Hirose K, Toyama T, Iwata H, et al: Insulin, insulin-like growth factor-I and breast cancer risk in Japanese women. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 4:239-246, 2003 30. Schairer C, Hill D, Sturgeon SR, et al: Serum concentrations of IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and c-peptide and risk of hyperplasia and cancer of the breast in postmenopausal women. Int J Cancer 108:773-779, 2004 31. Lawlor DA, GD, Ebrahim S: Hyper-insulinaemia and increased risk of breast cancer: Findings from the British Women's Heart and Health Study. Cancer Causes Control 15:267- 275, 2004 32. Muti P, Quattrin T, Grant BJ, et al: Fasting glucose is a risk factor for breast cancer: A prospective study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11:1361-1368, 2002 33. Furberg AS, Veierod MB, Wilsgaard T, et al: Serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, metabolic profile, and breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst 96:1152-1160, 2004 34. Malin A, Dai Q, Yu H, et al: Evaluation of the synergistic effect of insulin resistance and insulin-like growth factors on the risk of breast carcinoma. Cancer 100:694-700, 2004 35. Yu H, Shu XO, Li BD, et al: Joint effect of insulin-like growth factors and sex steroids on breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12:1067-1073, 2003 36. Goodwin PJ, Ennis M, Pritchard KI, et al: Fasting insulin and outcome in early-stage breast cancer: Results of a prospective cohort study. J Clin Oncol 20:42-51, 2002 37. Borugian MJ, Sheps SB, Kim-sing C, et al: Insulin, macronutrient intake, and physical activ-ity: Are potential indicators of insulin resistance associated with mortality from breast cancer? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13:1163- 1172, 2004 38. Holmes F: Physical activity and survival after breast cancer diagnosis. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 45:1462, 2004 (abstr) 39. Dignam JJ, Wieand K, KA, et al: Obesity, tamoxifen use, and outcomes in women with estrogen receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:1467- 1476, 2003 40. Berclaz G, Li S, Price KN, et al: Body mass index as a prognostic feature in operable breast cancer: The International Breast Cancer Study Group experience. Ann Oncol 15:875- 884, 2004 Table 5. Results of Multiple Linear Regression Model of Fasting Insulin Parameter Estimate SE of Estimate P Intercept -1.0195 0.2338 <.0001 Caloric intake > 2,204 kcal/day 0.0616 0.0266 .0209 Physical activity > 0-3.75 kcal/wk/kg 0.0309 0.0435 .4767 Physical activity > 3.75-8.75 kcal/wk/kg -0.0429 0.0391 .2727 Physical activity > 8.75-17.5 kcal/wk/kg -0.0359 0.0395 .3642 Physical activity > 17.5 kcal/wk/kg -0.1761 0.0420 <.0001 BMI (log-transformed) 0.9908 0.0687 <.0001 Alcohol intake > 1 drink/wk -0.0756 0.0271 .0054 Age (standardized) 0.0053 0.0018 .0035 NOTE. In the regression model, insulin was log-transformed. The association between physical activity and insulin level was significant (F = 6.90; P <.0001). Abbreviation: BMI, body mass index. Cheers, Alan Pater Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.