Guest guest Posted November 27, 2004 Report Share Posted November 27, 2004 Hi All, This seems to be a paper that is pdf-available and says that CR does not work in humans. The use of a prospective study was good, but the study was too short-term for my preferences. What I found to be most peculiar in the pdf was that in Table 4 the following data were presented for men for increasing quartiles of energy intakes. Energy intake (mean kcal/day, with range in parenthesis) 1748 (570–2043) 2229 (2043–2414) 2621 (2415–2859) 3377 (2859–8304) BMI (kg m^2) 26.8 26.3 26.1 26.0 Prior history of cancer, DM, MI or stroke (%) 21.7 14.5 11.9 9.6 Physical activity score 7580 8073 8568 9205 They ate increasing to a total of 4% more fat and decreasing to 2% less each of carbohydrates and protein with increasing quartiles of energy. No change in fruit and vegetable consumption occurred. For women, the same things were seen, with even a 1.2 BMI drop from low to high calorie intake. Did the subjects have an underlying condition that wasted their energy, such as undetected cancer? Other studies have found that, when the greater mortality in the short-term follow-up are excluded the subjects live longer instead. The above numbers suggest to me that this is true. Now, here is the abstract below. J Intern Med. 2004 Dec;256(6):499-509. The association between total energy intake and early mortality: data from the Malmo Diet and Cancer Study. Leosdottir M, Nilsson P, Nilsson JA, Mansson H, Berglund G. ... In animal studies, low energy intake (EI) has been associated with a longer lifespan. We examine whether EI is an independent risk factor for prospective all-cause mortality, cardiovascular and cancer mortality in humans. Design. Population-based, prospective cohort study. ... 28 098 individuals, mean age 58.2 years, completed questionnaires on diet and life-style and attended a physical examination ... mean follow-up time of 6.6 years. Subjects were categorized by quartiles of total EI. The first quartile was used as a reference point in estimating multivariate relative risks (RR; 95% CI, 's regression model). Adjustments were made for confounding by age and various life-style factors. Results. The lowest total mortality was observed for women in the third quartile (RR: 0.74; CI: 0.57-0.96) and for men in the second and third quartiles (RR: 0.85; CI: 0.69-1.04 and RR: 0.85; CI: 0.69-1.04 respectively). Similar U-shaped patterns were observed for cardiovascular mortality amongst women and cancer mortality amongst men. A statistically significant trend (P = 0.029) towards lower cardiovascular mortality from the first to the fourth quartile was observed for men. Conclusions. Low caloric consumers did, on average, not have lower mortality than average or high caloric consumers. Generally, individuals approximately meeting national recommendations for total EI had the lowest mortality. For men, high caloric intake was associated with lower cardiovascular mortality. PMID: 15554951 [PubMed - in process] Cheers, Alan Pater Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.