Guest guest Posted January 9, 2005 Report Share Posted January 9, 2005 Hi folks: The following should provoke some discussion here, LOL. I just got around to reading the abstract of the study reported upon in the link in my post to Rad, below. (Seems like a good idea to read it, lol). Here are what seem to me to be the key excerpts from the abstract that appear highly relevant to us here, edited without, I hope, in any way changing the meaning: " Results: ........... BP levels ............. were positively correlated with LBM. " Now read that again folks, just in case it didn't sink in. ***LBM*** is positively correlated with BP. And .......... : " Multiple regression analyses that included ethnicity, sex, angiotensin II, and measures of body composition indicated the following: a) LBM was the best predictor of stress systolic BP ................. " Abstract source: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science? _ob=ArticleURL & _udi=B6T0Y-4DR76PW-4 & _user=10 & _handle=B-WA-A-W-AZ- MsSAYVW-UUA-AAUDYCDYYY-AAUCVBYZYY-YVCYWUYDV-AZ- U & _fmt=summary & _coverDate=11%2F01%2F2004 & _rdoc=4 & _orig=browse & _srch=% 23toc%234875%232004%23999829988%23527452! _cdi=4875 & view=c & _acct=C000050221 & _version=1 & _urlVersion=0 & _userid=10 & md5=61e2936cbf152056f8bc44c6c55b78dd Or you might want to try instead: http://snipurl.com/bvsg So then, are we to presume from this that the loss of LBM in CRON is a ***positive*** benefit for blood pressure? That seems to be the implication. And taking the above one step further, should people on CRON be making efforts to preserve LBM? Or, on the contrary, should we be happy to see it decline along with BF% in our transitions from our ad lib BF%s to 'fully established CRON status' of 5% to 10% BF%? Just trying to draw logical conclusions from the evidence. (Of course, as I have noted before, that is a process which not infrequently can get you into trouble!). BP is only one measure of human health. How are the other important measures (lipids, cell proliferation, inflammation, etc ........ ) related to LBM? Is there a message here for the most muscular among us? Or am I out to lunch for even thinking to raise the issue? I am quite sure that this will sound like heresy to many here : ^ ))) Critiques of the above are more than welcome. Rodney. > > > > Hi, > > > > Some time back, the polymeal was discussed. > > > > Here is the actual article which was printed in the British Medical > > Journal: http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/329/7480/1447 > > > > At the end of the article is an interesting section called rapid > > responses. > > > > Actually, BMJ is an overall good publication to bookmark. > > > > One related question: what does the group suggest in terms of diet > > and nutrition to bring down stubbornly moderately high blood > pressure? > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Rad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.