Guest guest Posted January 17, 2005 Report Share Posted January 17, 2005 >>> But it seems to me that since, if one is going to practice CR, calories must be reduced somewhere, concentrated sources of calories (starch is one such concentrated source) that have a high GI (or probably better, a high II); low levels of micronutrients and antioxidants per calorie; Outside of " non Starchy " vegetables and many fruits, starchy vegetables may be the next most concentrated source of nutrients per calorie. Next to vegetables and fruits, they are also very low in calorie density. And, in regard to II, they actually have lower II than many foods " thought " to be low in II. For example... The insulin scores for the following foods may be eye opening (all numbers based on equal caloric portions) Beef 51 Fish 59 Cheese 45 Brown pasta 40 Porridge (Oatmeal) 40 Brown rice 62 Apples 59 Oranges 60 So, Whole Wheat Pasta, and Oatmeal actually produced lower insuling reactions that fish or beef or cheese. Apples and oranges produced a response not much different than Fish. In overall nutrient density, I will double check , but i think its the oatmeal that wins out of the above. >>Let me put it this way: it is probably better to reduce those than to reduce sources which have a low II; high levels of micronutrients and antioxidants per calorie; and low susceptibility to aflatoxin. Can you be more specific about which foods these are? If not nonstarchy vegetables, some fruits, and some lower calorie dense legumes (though I dont know many " higher " CD legumes outside of the chickpea). thanks Jeff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.