Guest guest Posted January 26, 2005 Report Share Posted January 26, 2005 Fish in news. We know healthy fish healthy for us. But which to choose? Help make right choice: Do you eat tuna or any other fish? If you do, read this: Methylmercury in Fish: The Facts by Anne Gallo, M.S. and Madeleine Levin, MPH What is methylmercury? Mercury is a mineral that exists naturally in the environment. In addition, thousands of tons are released into the air each year through pollution and waste. Bacteria and natural processes can transform mercury into the organic mercury compound methylmercury (MeHg), which is a poisonous substance. Unfortunately, this toxin is in the fish we eat. Methylmercury can enter the water or soil, accumulating in streams and oceans. It also accumulates in the food chain, as each fish absorbs all the mercury of the smaller fish or organisms it has eaten. That is why the oldest and largest fish, such as shark and swordfish, tend to have the highest levels. Methylmercury levels are higher in people who regularly eat fish. Who is at risk? The developing fetus is at greatest risk, when a pregnant mother eats a lot of fish. Methylmercury easily crosses the placenta, and accumulates in an unborn baby's blood. A baby's developing brain and nervous system are very sensitive to this toxin, and remain vulnerable after birth. Newborns can also consume methylmercury through breast milk. Young children who eat fish may also be at risk because, compared to adults, they eat more food relative to their body size. The Center For Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) defines populations sensitive to mercury exposure as pregnant and nursing women, children under the age of six (especially up to the age of three), people with impaired kidney function, and those with very sensitive immune responses to metals. Which fish are harmful? There is limited information about methylmercury in fish because there is no national or statewide system in place to monitor amounts. Most states, Native American tribes, and U.S. Territories issue advisories that warn people when they are aware of methylmercury contamination. The advisories indicate what types, size, and amounts of fish are of concern. Pollution can result in high mercury levels in fish. Otherwise, methylmercury levels for most fish are relatively low, ranging from less than .01 part per million (ppm) to .5 ppm. A few fish are so high in methylmercury that they should be totally avoided by pregnant or nursing women, young children, and other at-risk populations. (Please see chart below.) In March 2004, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a joint Consumer Advisory warning about methylmercury in fish. The advisory continues a previous warning against 4 particular species of fish and for the first time includes a specific warning about the consumption of tuna. The advisory recommends that women who might become pregnant, who are pregnant or nursing and young children do the following: * Avoid eating these four species of fish: shark, swordfish, king mackerel, and tilefish (also known as golden bass or golden snapper); * Limit their consumption of all other types of fish to 12 oz per week; * Limit their consumption of canned albacore ( " white " ) tuna or fresh tuna to no more than 6 ounces per week; * Limit the fish eaten by young children to even smaller portions per week (no specific advice is given); * Check local advisories about the safety of fish caught in local lakes, rivers, and coastal areas. If no advice is available, eat no more than 6 ounces per week of locally caught fish, and do not consume any other fish during that week; * If more than the recommended amount of fish is eaten in one week, eat less in the following weeks. The previous advice given by the EPA was more cautious, but they compromised with the FDA's less cautious approach. The EPA calculated safe levels of methylmercury based on individual bodyweight. Based on that previous standard, 6 ounces of canned albacore white tuna or fresh tuna per week could expose a pregnant or nursing woman to too much mercury, especially if she ate other fish as well. Many experts and consumer groups recommend caution by using the earlier EPA standards instead of the current joint advisory. Concerns about Tuna Levels of methylmercury in tuna are lower than in the four fish on the " do not eat " list but higher than many other fish. Since Americans eat so much tuna the risk could be greater. There are two types of canned tuna generally found in the U.S. market - albacore white and " light. " Fresh tuna and canned albacore white tuna are three times as high in methylmercury as canned light tuna, which comes from smaller fish. The amount of mercury in canned tuna varies from can to can, with canned albacore white tuna sometimes exceeding the danger zone of 1 part per million. While tuna is high in omega 3 acids, low in saturated fat, and high in protein and vitamin E, and can therefore be a part of a healthy diet, we recommend that women who may become pregnant, pregnant women and nursing mothers avoid fresh tuna and canned albacore white tuna and eat no more than one 6 ounce can of light tuna per week. (For most women, that would be two or three tuna salad sandwiches, depending on what the tuna salad contains). If a woman in these high-risk categories does have tuna steak, tuna sushi, or canned albacore white tuna, we recommend that she reduce her intake of fish over the next weeks to reduce her mercury intake. We recommend that young children consume no fresh tuna or canned albacore tuna, and less than 6 ounces per week of canned light tuna or other fish with moderate mercury levels. It is possible that more could result in neurological damage to babies and young children. The risks The health risks of methylmercury include paraesthesia (a pricking, tingling or creeping sensation on the skin), depression, and blurred vision. Research also suggests neurobehavioral effects on fetuses and developing infants, including attention span, language, visual-spatial skills, memory, and coordination. Several years ago, the National Academy of Sciences estimated that nearly 60,000 children each year are born at risk for neurological problems due to methylmercury exposure in the womb. Recent data suggest the numbers could be much higher because of the fish consumption of pregnant women. What if I'm a man or older woman? Unless there is an advisory about fish in your area, the FDA and EPA have not expressed concern about methylmercury exposure for men or women who are beyond reproductive age. However, people with impaired kidney function, and those with very sensitive immune responses to metals should be very careful to avoid mercury. Even if you are not especially vulnerable, it makes sense to consider moderation if you like to eat the fish that are higher in mercury. See the chart below for a summary of mercury risk posed by specific types of fish. Fish to avoid if you are/may be pregnant, nursing, or a young child Fish to consume in limited quantities if you are/may be pregnant, nursing, or a young child Fish lowest in methylmercury Shark Swordfish King Mackerel Tilefish (a.k.a. golden bass, golden snapper) Lower in mercury but still to be avoided: Tuna steak (also used in sushi and sashimi) Canned Albacore White Tuna Canned Light Tuna Sea Bass Gulf Coast Oysters Marlin Halibut Pike Walleye White Croaker Largemouth Bass Mahi Mahi Blue Mussel Cod Eastern Oyster Channel Catfish (wild) Great Lakes Salmon Gulf Coast Blue Crab Lake Whitefish Pollack Catfish (farmed) King Crab Scallops Fish Sticks Flounder (summer) Trout (farmed) Salmon (wild Pacific) Shrimp Tilapia Sardines http://www.center4research.org/methylmercury2.html Good long life to all us! Stay Happy! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 27, 2005 Report Share Posted January 27, 2005 Maybe we need to eval the EPA/DHA content of the fish versus the methyHg? Don't forget tetraethyl lead. Regards. ----- Original Message ----- From: chuinyun Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 1:51 PM Subject: [ ] Methylmercury in Fish: The Facts Fish in news. We know healthy fish healthy for us. But which to choose?Help make right choice:Do you eat tuna or any other fish? If you do, read this:Methylmercury in Fish: The Factsby Anne Gallo, M.S. and Madeleine Levin, MPHWhat is methylmercury?Mercury is a mineral that exists naturally in the environment. Inaddition, thousands of tons are released into the air each yearthrough pollution and waste. Bacteria and natural processes cantransform mercury into the organic mercury compound methylmercury(MeHg), which is a poisonous substance.Unfortunately, this toxin is in the fish we eat. Methylmercury canenter the water or soil, accumulating in streams and oceans. It alsoaccumulates in the food chain, as each fish absorbs all the mercury ofthe smaller fish or organisms it has eaten. That is why the oldest andlargest fish, such as shark and swordfish, tend to have the highestlevels. Methylmercury levels are higher in people who regularly eat fish. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 27, 2005 Report Share Posted January 27, 2005 >>Maybe we need to eval the EPA/DHA content of the fish versus the methyHg? Don't forget tetraethyl lead. I did it and update it every year. Here is the latest. Its on page 6-8 http://www.pritikin.com/pdf/2004/septoct04.pdf Regards jeff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 28, 2005 Report Share Posted January 28, 2005 Thanks Jeff, Great article. Pollock is .06 and it's cheap too. But salmon (ugh) has 3 times as much EPA (USDA), for 6 oz, .71 versus .26 for: Pollock, walleye .26. I guess that's the Alaska Pollock, I'm getting. Fresh salmon,wild is .01 ppm Hg. Curious that the higher EPA/DHA also are the lower Hg. Also, we get tilapia from Chile and china. Both are .01? BTW, "whitefish" is ambiguous. ALL the types that go into "whitefish" are .03 ppm? Regards. ----- Original Message ----- From: Jeff Novick Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 5:58 AM Subject: RE: [ ] Methylmercury in Fish: The Facts >>Maybe we need to eval the EPA/DHA content of the fish versus the methyHg?Don't forget tetraethyl lead.I did it and update it every year. Here is the latest. Its on page 6-8http://www.pritikin.com/pdf/2004/septoct04.pdfRegardsjeff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 28, 2005 Report Share Posted January 28, 2005 Remember, these numbers are based on averages of various amounts of samples. You can see where I got the numbers from here.,... http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~frf/sea-mehg.html Jeff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.