Guest guest Posted January 26, 2005 Report Share Posted January 26, 2005 This is the kind of study that brings out the skeptic in me, at least as far as the methodology is concerned. Since most lung cancer is caused by *airborne* contamination (asbestos dust, cigarette smoke, heated cooking oils, etc), it seems to me that the results would be more significant if all these sources of potential carcinogens had been considered. In the experiment they matched age, sex, and residence. How many of these people were smokers or had exposure to second hand smoke? What was their exposure to cooking fumes from heated oil or from burning wood, etc.? How many of these people lived or worked in dusty environments? IMO, the experiment is flawed unless these factors were considered. The abstract does not indicate that there was any allowance or adjustment for airborne contamination in the study. Tony >>> From: " " <rawsunlife@y...> Date: Wed Jan 26, 2005 7:01 am Subject: Miso, Soy, Pickles, Japanese and Lung Cancer Lung Cancer 1999 Sep;25(3):147-59 Risk modification in lung cancer by a dietary intake of preserved foods and soyfoods: findings from a case-control study in Okinawa, Japan. Wakai K, Ohno Y, Genka K, Ohmine K, Kawamura T, Ta Department of Preventive Medicine, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Japan. To disclose the association of dietary intake of preserved foods and soyfoods with lung cancer risk, we analyzed the data from a case- control study conducted in Okinawa, Japan, from 1988 to 1991. The analysis, based on 333 cases and 666 age-, sex- and residence-matched population controls, [snip] These findings suggested deleterious effects of preserved foods and protective ones of soyfoods rich in isoflavones. >>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.