Guest guest Posted January 12, 2005 Report Share Posted January 12, 2005 Hi All, It seems that our lower generally but within the normal range glucose levels protect us from cancers. Now, a new report, its review and its summary on our blood sugar level and our risk of cancers has been presented in the latest issue of JAMA. BMI had no effect on the risk of all cancers. The subjects had relatively low BMIs. Please see the below. No. 2, January 12, 2005 This Week in JAMA JAMA. 2005;293:135. Fasting Serum Glucose and Cancer Risk Several studies suggest an association between diabetes and increased cancer risk. To further investigate this association, Jee and colleagues (SEE ARTICLE) analyzed data on fasting serum glucose, diabetes, and incident cancers and cancer deaths from a prospective cohort study of nearly 1.3 million Korean adults. They found dose- response relationships between fasting serum glucose levels and rates of overall cancer mortality and cancer incidence. Mortality and incidence risks were higher for persons with diabetes compared with persons without, and adjustment for body mass index did not alter the findings. In an editorial, Cooney and Gruber (SEE ARTICLE) discuss how hyperglycemia and diabetes may influence cancer incidence and mortality and the public health significance of this association. Editorials Hyperglycemia, Obesity, and Cancer Risks on the Horizon Kathleen A. Cooney; B. Gruber JAMA. 2005;293:235-236. The prevalence of diabetes mellitus has increased substantially over the past several decades, in part because of the growing epidemic of obesity.1 Approximately 8% of the US population has diabetes,2 with more than 90% of cases classified as type 2 diabetes, and with insulin resistance as the major underlying pathophysiology. Much of the emphasis in diabetes management focuses on reducing end- organ complications, including retinopathy, neuropathy, nephropathy, and macrovascular disease. Several recent epidemiological studies, including the report by Jee et al3 in this issue of JAMA, have also shown an association between diabetes and several common cancers, including pancreas and colon cancer. How important is this effect and what are the public health implications? The prospective cohort study of nearly 1.3 million people conducted by Jee et al3 took advantage of data collected by the insurance provider for all government employees, teachers, and their dependents in Korea. A cohort of individuals was enrolled over 4 years at the time of required biennial medical examinations and was then followed up for as long as a decade. Outcomes were measured through national registration of death certificates, a national cancer registry, and hospitalization records. The main finding was that elevated fasting serum glucose levels were associated with a 27% increase in cancer mortality among men and a 31% increase among women. A dose-response trend was evident, with higher fasting glucose levels associated with higher cancer mortality rates. Cancer incidence rates followed similar patterns. One of the unique aspects of this study3 is that Korea has a low rate of obesity in the population. The average body mass index (BMI) in the study population was 23.2, with approximately one fourth of the population considered overweight (defined as BMI 25.0). By comparison, recent National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data demonstrate that approximately 65% of US men and women are overweight or obese, nearly one third are obese (defined as BMI 30), and 5% are extremely obese (defined as BMI 40).4 If current trends continue, 40% of the US population will be classified as obese in 2010.5 In the United States, diabetes is tightly linked to obesity, and the proportion of individuals with diabetes who meet the definitions of overweight and obese is higher than in the general population (79% and 46%, respectively).6 For the first time, this Korean study has made significant progress toward separating the specific effects of elevated blood glucose from the compendium of other metabolic abnormalities observed in obesity. The investigators were able to demonstrate a direct relationship between fasting serum glucose levels and cancer mortality across all BMI groups (<20, 20 to <23, and >23). A wealth of epidemiological data supports the association between obesity and various types of malignancies, including postmenopausal breast cancer and cancers of the colon, pancreas, endometrium, esophagus (adenocarcinoma), kidney, gallbladder, and gastric cardia.7 The link between obesity and cancer may be mediated by insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia. However, several complex physiological changes also result from obesity, including alterations in sex steroid levels. For example, obesity is associated with increased levels of bioavailable estrogen due to enhanced biosynthesis in adipocytes and reduced sex hormone–binding globulin levels.7 Thus, in the complex setting of obesity, it is difficult to tease out the specific molecular alterations that lead to cancer, and these contributions are likely to be site-specific. Well-designed cohort studies can provide compelling observational data, and the study by Jee et al3 has several methodological strengths. First, it is likely that the cohort is reasonably representative of Korea, since the insurance provider covers more than 10% of the Korean population, and only 2.1% of the participants were excluded on the basis of incomplete data. Second, important information about other risk factors was collected by these investigators through use of a lifestyle and medical history questionnaire. In contrast, many other population-based cohort studies rely on national linkage registries that do not have this type of information, thereby limiting the ability to adjust for potential confounders. Third, the study cohort is extremely large, which increases the ability to recognize and distinguish very small relative risks as statistically significant. This last attribute is important, because small risks can be meaningful. Tangible elevations in cancer risk were observed in Korean men and women who had fasting serum glucose measurements that were below the commonly recognized threshold of 125 mg/dL for a diagnosis of diabetes. Indeed, a fasting glucose level from 90 to 109 mg/dL was associated with a 4% increase in risk of cancer mortality among men (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.07). Even though this relative risk is minuscule, what it reflects in the broader context of this study is that elevated fasting glucose levels confer risk on a continuous scale. Just as clinical thresholds for hypertension and serum lipids are not easily categorized into " healthy " and " diseased, " the same appears to be true for fasting serum glucose. Of course, no observational study is perfect, and this study has its limitations. The strongest relative risks were associated with pancreatic cancer, and despite the appropriate methodological approaches used in this study, the possibility that hyperglycemia was caused by the pancreatic cancer through endocrine insufficiency cannot be excluded definitively. In addition, since this study is not randomized, the exposed and unexposed groups might not have been appropriately balanced in the analysis. It is also possible that individuals with hyperglycemia were followed up more carefully by physicians, which would lead to more cancer diagnoses. However, this would not explain the strong findings with respect to cancer mortality. Moreover, cancer is not a single disease, and the case for hyperglycemia as a risk factor for " all cancer " is driven primarily by the data from the digestive cancers among men. Among women, the summary result is related primarily to risks measured for pancreatic cancer. While this study did not describe the risks of endometrial cancer associated with hyperglycemia, both diabetes and obesity are recognized risk factors for this disease.8 Similarly, the analysis of breast cancer leaves more questions than answers. The modest elevation in breast cancer incidence with elevated fasting blood glucose observed by Jee et al3 was not statistically significant, although addition of women identified through use of medication for diabetes was associated with a significantly increased risk (hazard ratio, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-1.80). These findings raise questions about how hyperglycemia might operate differently in premenopausal and postmenopausal women and suggest that various aspects of diabetes treatment should be addressed in future analyses of the data. How may these results be interpreted in the context of cancer incidence and mortality in the population? Fortunately, the relative risks are modest and, therefore, the fraction of cancers attributable to elevated fasting glucose in the Korean population is small, in part because of the relatively low prevalence of diabetes in Korea (5%). Based on data provided in this study, an estimated 3.9% of cancer deaths in men and 0.8% of cancer deaths in women are attributable to diabetes, representing 846 of the total 26 473 cancer deaths observed in this study. However, these numbers may not reflect unmeasured confounding or effect modification.9 Some of these cancer deaths may be preventable, and further studies will be required to demonstrate that reductions in hyperglycemia and diabetes will lead to declines in cancer mortality. This is especially true in light of data from the Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group demonstrating a reduction in the incidence of diabetes through lifestyle interventions, including dietary modification and introduction of a regular exercise routine.10 Since the hazard ratios reported by Jee et al3 are derived from a Korean population, they cannot be directly implemented to increase understanding of the population-attributable fraction of cancer that may be due to diabetes in the United States. But since the prevalence of diabetes is higher in the United States than in Korea, it is possible that preventing diabetes may have a more important effect in the United States. As diabetes becomes an increasing public health concern in modern societies, the cancer risks looming on the horizon are now being recognized. Strategies to address the emerging epidemics of diabetes and obesity are likely to have a broad impact on public health. Indeed, these approaches may ultimately diminish the burden of cancer for future generations. Fasting Serum Glucose Level and Cancer Risk in Korean Men and Women Sun Ha Jee; Heechoul Ohrr; Jae Woong Sull; Ji Eun Yun; Min Ji; M. Samet JAMA. 2005;293:194-202. ABSTRACT Context Diabetes is a serious and costly disease that is becoming increasingly common in many countries. The role of diabetes as a cancer risk factor remains unclear. Objective To examine the relationship between fasting serum glucose and diabetes and risk of all cancers and specific cancers in men and women in Korea. Design, Setting, and Participants Ten-year prospective cohort study of 1 298 385 Koreans (829 770 men and 468 615 women) aged 30 to 95 years who received health insurance from the National Health Insurance Corp and had a biennial medical evaluation in 1992-1995 (with follow-up for up to 10 years). Main Outcome Measures Death from cancer and registry-documented incident cancer or hospital admission for cancer. Results During the 10 years of follow-up, there were 20 566 cancer deaths in men and 5907 cancer deaths in women. Using proportional hazards models and controlling for smoking and alcohol use, the stratum with the highest fasting serum glucose (140 mg/dL [7.8 mmol/L]) had higher death rates from all cancers combined (hazard ratio , 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-1.37 in men and HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.09-1.39 in women) compared with the stratum with the lowest level (<90 mg/dL [<5.0 mmol/L]). By cancer site, the association was strongest for pancreatic cancer, comparing the highest and lowest strata in men (HR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.52-2.41) and in women (HR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.43-2.93). Significant associations were also found for cancers of the esophagus, liver, and colon/rectum in men and of the liver and cervix in women, and there were significant trends with glucose level for cancers of the esophagus, colon/rectum, liver, pancreas, and bile duct in men and of the liver and pancreas in women. Of the 26 473 total cancer deaths in men and women, 848 were estimated as attributable to having a fasting serum glucose level of less than 90 mg/dL. For cancer incidence, the general patterns reflected those found for mortality. For persons with a diagnosis of diabetes or a fasting serum glucose level greater than 125 mg/dL (6.9 mmol/L), risks for cancer incidence and mortality were generally elevated compared with those without diabetes. Conclusion In Korea, elevated fasting serum glucose levels and a diagnosis of diabetes are independent risk factors for several major cancers, and the risk tends to increase with an increased level of fasting serum glucose. INTRODUCTION Diabetes mellitus is a serious and costly disease that is becoming increasingly common in many countries, including Korea.1 Recent data show that approximately 150 million people have diabetes mellitus worldwide, and this number may double by 2025, especially in developing countries, because of population growth, aging, unhealthy diets, obesity, and sedentary lifestyles.2 The association between diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular mortality is well established.3 However, while the role of diabetes as a risk factor for cancer is still uncertain, having diabetes or an elevated glucose level is of interest because of the effect of insulin on cell growth and of the systemic inflammation associated with diabetes and the metabolic syndrome.4-5 Recent observational studies have provided consistent evidence on associations of diabetes with increased risk of cancers of the pancreas,5 liver,6 endometrium,7 and colon/rectum.8 Data on cancers of the esophagus, stomach, prostate, and breast are more limited and have been inconsistent.8-9 This lack of consistency may be attributable to the limited number of studies and their small sample sizes. We conducted a prospective cohort investigation, the Korean Cancer Prevention Study (KCPS), among more than 1 million Koreans to assess associations of fasting serum glucose and of a diagnosis of diabetes with cancer risk.10 In addition, we explored modification of this risk by obesity in a population with a low average body weight compared with those of Western countries. .... RESULTS The population was primarily middle-aged, with approximately twice as many men as women (Table 1). By the criteria of self-report and fasting serum glucose level, the prevalence rates of diabetes were about 5% in men and 4.5% in women. The population had a low body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters) on average, and only 23.8% and 0.8% of men and 27.0% and 2.5% of women had BMI values of 25 or above and above 30, respectively. Both smoking and alcohol use were substantially more common in men. Overall Pattern of All-Cause Mortality and Fasting Serum Glucose Level During the 10 years of follow-up, 54 385 deaths occurred among men and 20 362 among women. As shown in Figure 1, fasting serum glucose level was positively associated with all-cause mortality rates. In the adjusted proportional hazards model, this effect persisted, with persons in the highest stratum of fasting serum glucose (140 mg/dL) having a higher HR for all causes combined (HR, 2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.03-2.16 in men and HR, 2.35; 95% CI, 2.24- 2.48 in women) compared with the lowest stratum (<90 mg/dL) (Table 2 and Table 3). Cancer Mortality A total of 20 566 cancer deaths occurred among men and 5907 deaths occurred among women during the 10 years of follow-up. In general, HR estimates were above unity for male participants in the higher strata of serum glucose level and among those with a diagnosis of diabetes (Table 2). In fact, all point estimates were somewhat elevated in association with a diagnosis of diabetes. We explored the relationship between duration of diabetes and cancer risk and did not find consistent associations, with the exception of pancreatic cancer in men. Among men with diabetes, the HRs for pancreatic cancer death with diabetes durations of less than 4.9 years, 5.0 to 9.9 years, and 10 years or more were 2.0 (95% CI, 1.2-3.3), 2.4 (95% CI, 1.4-4.3), and 3.0 (95% CI, 1.8-5.0), respectively, compared with those without diabetes. We observed linear trends in mortality with increasing fasting serum glucose level for all cancers combined and for cancers of several sites (Table 2). Compared with the reference category (<90 mg/dL), men with a fasting serum glucose level above 140 mg/dL had significantly elevated HRs of death from cancers of the esophagus (HR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.08-1.93), liver (HR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.40-1.76), pancreas (HR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.52-2.41), and colon/rectum (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.03-1.67). Significant associations were also found for bladder cancer and leukemia for those with a fasting serum glucose level of 126 mg/dL or higher. Men with a fasting serum glucose level of 110 to 125 mg/dL had significantly elevated HRs of death from esophageal, stomach, colon/rectal, liver, and pancreatic cancers. Of the total of 20 566 cancer deaths in men, 802 were estimated as attributable to having a fasting serum glucose level of less than 90 mg/dL. For women, the overall pattern of association was similar to that in men (Table 3), with all point estimates increased for those with diabetes. Significant positive linear trends in death rates were observed for pancreatic cancer; HRs ranged from 1.70 (95% CI, 1.17- 2.46) at fasting serum glucose levels of 110 to 125 mg/dL to 2.05 (95% CI, 1.43-2.93) at fasting serum glucose levels of 126 mg/dL or higher (Table 3). Significant associations with diabetes were also found for cancers of the liver, lung, breast, and cervix, while associations were not observed for risk of death from cancers of the stomach or colon/rectum. Of the total 5907 cancer deaths in women, 46 were estimated as attributable to having a fasting serum glucose level less than 90 mg/dL. Cancer Incidence The numbers of incident cases during the 10 years of follow-up were 37 759 among men and 16 074 among women. Trends were generally similar for mortality and incidence. We observed positive linear trends in cancer incidence with increasing fasting serum glucose levels for cancers of the liver, pancreas, and kidney (Table 4). However, fasting serum glucose level was inversely associated with prostate cancer incidence among men with a fasting glucose level of at least 126 mg/dL. The association of fasting serum glucose level and cancer incidence was similar whether the analysis was based on the total population or on those who had at least a 5-year follow-up period (data not shown). Furthermore, the incidence findings were unchanged with adjustment for BMI. For example, men with diabetes had similar HRs of death from pancreatic cancer before (HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.42-2.06) and after (HR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.42-2.07) BMI adjustment. In women, positive linear trends were observed in incidence of pancreatic cancer with increasing fasting serum glucose level (Table 5). We observed a significant association for liver cancer for the stratum with fasting serum glucose levels of 110 to 125 mg/dL. The observed associations in women were unchanged with adjustment for BMI (data not shown). Cancer Mortality and Incidence and Fasting Glucose Levels According to BMI in Men To control for potential confounding by obesity and to evaluate effect modification, the data were further stratified by BMI (<20, 20 to <23, and 23). Because of limited numbers for some cancer sites, the analyses were carried out for all sites combined and for cancers of the colon/rectum, liver, and pancreas. For all cancers, a trend was evident in mortality risk by fasting serum glucose level in each stratum of BMI (Figure 2). Positive trends in death rates were observed for cancers of the liver and pancreas in all BMI groups as well. The risk of death due to liver and pancreatic cancers associated with fasting serum glucose level was not modified by BMI. For cancer incidence, the association of fasting serum glucose level with risk for liver cancer remained consistent and lacked evidence of effect modification by obesity. The association of pancreatic cancer incidence with fasting serum glucose level was not as consistent as for mortality, although all strata showed increased risk compared with the reference category. We also assessed potential modification of the effect of serum glucose level by smoking and alcohol consumption. We did not find significant interactions for cancer incidence or mortality in either men or women. COMMENT This cohort of Koreans, in comparison with Western populations, is notable for the low frequency of obesity in its participants. The average BMI was 23.2, and only one fourth of participants had a BMI above 25. Based on other studies in Korea, almost all cases of diabetes could be expected to be type 2.16 Nonetheless, we documented, as in Western populations, that serum glucose level and presence of diabetes are associated with cancer incidence and mortality. Other studies have addressed diabetes or glucose intolerance and risk for cancer. Although diverse in design and in their measures of glucose intolerance, the majority have shown that increased cancer risk, either overall or for particular cancer sites, is associated with glucose intolerance. The magnitude of the association of glucose intolerance or diabetes with risk for all cancers was small in the KCPS but was within the range found in some studies.5-6,17 The multicancer site effect is consistent with postulated mechanisms of systemic consequences of hyperinsulinemia.4-5 In interpreting the findings of these studies and of the KCPS, potential confounding by obesity is of concern. In the KCPS, we found that the increased cancer risk associated with high serum glucose or diabetes was unchanged when controlling for BMI; additionally, most KCPS participants were not overweight. The association of serum glucose level with cancer risk did not vary by BMI (Figure 2). The study confirmed the excess risk of digestive cancers reported in several studies,5-6,8 particularly of cancers of the pancreas, liver, esophagus, and colon among persons with diabetes. For pancreatic cancer, a 1995 meta-analysis of cohort and case-control studies estimated a 2-fold increase in risk of pancreatic cancer, comparing patients with and without diabetes.18 The KCPS estimates were similar, and the HR increased with increasing fasting serum glucose level (Table 2 and Table 3), as found in a Chicago cohort study.4 Our prospective results, along with the unchanged findings with exclusion of the first 5 years of follow-up, weigh against the possibility that the presence of pancreatic cancer increases blood glucose levels; ie, reverse causality. In the KCPS, we observed a significant positive linear trend for risk of pancreatic cancer with fasting glucose level: the HR was 1.7 (95% CI, 1.4-2.1) in men with diabetes and 1.5 (95% CI, 1.2-1.9) when data were restricted to men with at least 5 years of follow-up time. The complementary findings with these exposure measures, serum glucose level, and report of diabetes, and the presence of a dose-response relationship with fasting serum glucose level support a causal interpretation of these associations. The findings for several other cancer sites further support this interpretation. In men, we found increased risks of cancers of the esophagus, liver, stomach, colon/rectum, kidney, and bladder and leukemia (Table 2), while in women, risk was increased for cancers of the liver, lung, breast, and cervix (Table 3). Other studies have also found increased risk for these cancer sites.19-20 In Korea, hepatitis B infection is common and is an important cause of liver cancer.21 Serum glucose level was not associated with hepatitis B surface antigen status in the subset of participants with assay results, indicating that hepatitis B does not confound the results for liver cancer. On hospital admission diagnoses, we found little mention of nonalcoholic steatotic hepatitis, suggesting that the increased risk of liver cancer associated with higher serum glucose level reflects a direct pathway rather than an indirect pathway through obesity and fatty liver damage. For prostate cancer, for both incidence and mortality, we found no evidence for an association with either fasting serum glucose level or diabetes (Table 2 and Table 4), consistent with other reports. One large, population-based Swedish cohort study found that men with diabetes had a 10% lower risk of developing prostate cancer than the general male population.22 A reduced risk for men with diabetes was found in a case-control study in New York.23 In contrast, the American Cancer Society's Cancer Prevention Study showed no association between diabetes at baseline and prostate cancer mortality,24 and a study of incidence in 823 participants in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging also found association with fasting insulin and glucose levels.20 The lack of association for prostate cancer weighs against observation bias as contributing to the positive associations for other sites; the medical care and frequent blood chemistries associated with diabetes might be expected to increase the opportunity for detecting prostate cancer, but the negative association is inconsistent with such bias. Hyperinsulinemia has been cited as a possible risk factor for breast cancer, and supporting laboratory findings have been reported,5 but results of epidemiological studies have been mixed.25 In a recent publication based on the Nurses' Health Study, women with type 2 diabetes had a small increase in risk (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.01- 1.35). The association was apparent among postmenopausal women but not among premenopausal women.25 We did not find an association, although 95% CIs for our estimates covered the value from the Nurses' Health Study. With stratification at age 55 years, we did not find increased risk in the older stratum, corresponding to an age range when most women would be postmenopausal. The potential limitations of our study result primarily from using data collected for clinical purposes. Serum glucose was measured under fasting conditions using clinical laboratories operating with standard quality assurance and control protocols in place. A single measurement of fasting serum glucose made for clinical purposes is used as a diagnostic standard and matches the World Health Organization's recommended approach for epidemiological studies.26 We further relied on self-report of a diagnosis of diabetes; the serum glucose level of those with reported history of diabetes was 66 mg/dL higher than for those not reporting diabetes, suggesting that the self-reported information was valid. We do not anticipate that these clinical data would artifactually introduce association of cancer risk with fasting serum glucose level. Cancer mortality is subject to misclassification on death certificates, particularly with regard to attribution to a particular site. The limitations of death certificate data on cancer have been characterized in some countries,27-28 but we are uncertain as to the applicability of the findings of these studies in Korea. A small study within KCPS showed high validity for a death certificate listing of lung cancer.29 Additionally, we have found that of KCPS participants with incident liver cancer, 73% of their deaths were attributed to liver cancer over a follow-up interval of at least 5 years. In Korea, cancer registration is not yet complete nationwide; it is currently estimated at 90%.30 Consequently, we used hospital admission for cancer as a further indication of cancer incidence. We were able to take potential confounding by smoking and alcohol consumption into account and explored effect modification by obesity. We cannot attribute the associations of fasting serum glucose level and diabetes to uncontrolled confounding, particularly given the dose- response relationships observed with glucose. While the generalizability of the findings is uncertain, we have shown that fasting serum glucose level and diabetes are associated with cancer risk in a population far leaner than the Western populations in other studies. These associations do not reflect confounding by obesity, suggesting that the mechanism of increased cancer risk reflects the consequences of hyperinsulinemia. Glucose intolerance may be one pathway by which obesity increases cancer risk, and rising obesity may increase future cancer rates. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.