Guest guest Posted January 5, 2005 Report Share Posted January 5, 2005 >>> Which model better for CRON: you be 110lbs with more muscle or you be ~125 with more fat? I thought about this some more and while I again dont think the 2 options apply to the info i posted or to me as neither one represented my experiences that I shared, I thought I would take the actual info I did post about my actual weights, and ask you the same questions. Here are the options (based on actual numbers) and you tell me which is better for CR-ON. (I have acheived these " points " both on the way down and the way up with both aerobic and resistance training involved) (FFM - Fat Free Mass, BMI- Body Mass Index, BF- Body Fat) 1) 104 lbs, BMI 16.78, BF 4-5%, 5.2 lbs fat, 98.8 lbs FFM 2) 117 lbs, BMI 18.88, BF 7-8%, 9.4 lbs fat, 107.6 lbs FFM, which is similar to what you seemed to recommend which is scenerio one, with 9 lbs (not 5 lbs) of muscle added and 4 lbs fat. Its hard to add one without the other. 3) 122 lbs, BMI 19.68, BF 8-10%, 12.2 lbs fat, 109.8 lbs FFM So, if I stopped halfway between scenerio 1 and 2, , I would have Scenerio 1B, and would have been 111 lbs, BMI 17.9, BF 6 % (?), 6.66 lbs fat, 104.34 lbs FFM, which would have been scenerio one with 5 lbs muscle and 1.5 lbs fat added, which is exactly what you recommended So, would model do you think would be better for CR-ON, 1, 2, 3 or the halfway between 1 & 2, which I called 1B? Rodney and Tony have had many discussions about how much muscle vs fat people lose on the way up and the way down, and i Have seen some formulas posted, so I dont know if these fit the models or the formulas in their discussions, but your comments are also welcome, as anyone else. Thanks Jeff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.