Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Analyzing Chocolate

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Hi folks:

Saw some dark chocolate chips at a sensible price in a store today,

and bought them before analyzing the nutrient data (didn't have my

calculator with me). I will be returning the package for refund

tomorrow.

First, the fat calories amount to about 40% of total. Ten percent

would have been better. But also, carbohydrates are **fourteen

times** the protein content. This indicates a gigantic added sugar

component. No wonder the price was sensible - sugar is cheaper than

cocoa.

What is more, the sugar addition dramatically 'diluted' the 'fat

calories percent total' number also. If we figuratively remove

enough of the added sugar to bring the carbs down to just double the

protein, then the fat calories must have amounted to about 76% of the

total calories before the sugar was added.

A good example of dark, transfat-free, chocolate NOT to buy. (But I

had been impressed by the total absence of transfats in the

ingredient list! DUH!)

Rodney.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...