Guest guest Posted March 21, 2005 Report Share Posted March 21, 2005 Hi folks: I have just sent the following to an organization that should know the answers to my two questions. I do not expect to get an answer. In my experience, when one writes to an organization asking questions which suggest their methods may be inadequate the natural response (if my suggestion is correct) is to ignore the issue, and the email. But if I am mistaken I will get an answer straightening me out for sure. I will of course keep you good folks updated. Here is the content of the email: " Good morning: I have a question about the reason for the use of a reference group matched only for age, sex and race for determination of T and Z scores for BMD. In several studies I have read it is agreed that BMI is a major factor that is well correlated with BMD. Indeed, one study, done in Japan, found that BMI was the *only* factor with a statistically significant correlation with BMD. Most authorities these days seem to agree that the ideally healthy BMI is between 20 and 25. A BMI of between 25 and 30 is considered overweight, while a BMI of 30 is considered to be the threshold for obesity. According to the most recent data from the NHANES survey, for the period 1999 - 2002, the average BMI was well above 25. For example, for males aged 60 to 74, the average BMI was found to have risen appreciably since the previous survey and stood at 28.6. If the same rate of increase has continued since the last survey then the current average BMI for that group is 29.3. It appears therefore that the T and Z scores provided by DXA analysis software compare the BMD of each patient with the average BMD score for people who are grossly overweight - indeed only marginally short of being classified as obese. So I have two questions: First, since BMD scores are so closely related to BMI does it make sense to compare the BMD of a patient whose weight places them right in the middle of the 'ideal' BMI range (say, a BMI of 22.5) with that of patients very nearly categorized as obese? Why would anyone want to take as a reference group, a group that is quite clearly unhealthy? Isn't the usual custom with other medical tests to compare a patient's score with a **healthy** reference group? Is there a good reason to make an exception in the case of BMD, and use an unhealthy group for reference purposes? Second, could you please tell me where I can find data for North Americans which show BMD 'norms' broken out not only for age, race and gender, but also for BMI for each group? Many thanks for any assistance you can provide with this. (signed) " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.