Guest guest Posted March 17, 2005 Report Share Posted March 17, 2005 Social Security may not be in as much trouble after all http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/short/352/11/1135 Mike Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 17, 2005 Report Share Posted March 17, 2005 The authors estimate that normal weight could give individuals only 1/4 to 3/4 of a year more life. That's not enough to convince even me (although I'm not going ad lib by any means)...... on 3/17/2005 8:23 AM, mikesheldrick at mike@... wrote: > > Social Security may not be in as much trouble after all > > http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/short/352/11/1135 > > Mike > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 17, 2005 Report Share Posted March 17, 2005 Yes. Sometime there needs to be a reconciliation of the data which show, very approximately, a (not huge) extension of human lifespan of somewhat less than one year for each BMI unit reduction from 30 to 23 on the one hand, and the (huge) 40% life extension in 40% restricted mice on the other. As previously noted ................ either the human lifespan curve becomes very steep somewhere not very far below a BMI of 23, or the mouse results are not applicable to humans. Then there are the data which suggest that human mortality is minimized somewhere between a BMI of 20 and 22 ......... and probably in the upper half of that range. More on this latter data set, perhaps, another time. Rodney. > > > > > Social Security may not be in as much trouble after all > > > > http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/short/352/11/1135 > > > > Mike > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.