Guest guest Posted March 9, 2005 Report Share Posted March 9, 2005 Hi All, The conclusion of the pdf-available below paper may be: " independently of total energy intake, substituting polyunsaturated FAs with saturated or monounsaturated FAs may reduce pancreatic cancer risk, particularly in subjects who are obese. " Nkondjock A, Krewski D, KC, Ghadirian P. Dietary patterns and risk of pancreatic cancer. Int J Cancer. 2005 May 1;114(5):817-23. PMID: 15609315 [PubMed - in process] ... fatty acid (FA) ... a population-based case-control study of 462 histologically confirmed cases and 4721 frequency-matched controls in eight Canadian provinces between 1994 and 1997. ... adjustment for age, province, body mass index, smoking, educational attainment, fat and total energy intake, statistically significant inverse associations were observed between pancreatic cancer risk and palmitate (odds ratios (ORs)=0.73; 95% confidence intervals (CIs) 0.56-0.96; P-trend=0.02), stearate (OR=0.70; 95% CI 0.51-0.94; P- trend=0.04), oleate (OR=0.75; 95% CI 0.55-1.02; P-trend=0.04), saturated FAs (OR=0.67; 95% CI 0.50-0.91; P-trend=0.01), and monounsaturated FAs (OR=0.72; 95% CI 0.53-0.98; P-trend=0.02), when comparing the highest quartile of intake to the lowest. Significant interactions were detected between body mass index and both saturated and monounsaturated FAs, with a markedly reduced risk associated with intake of stearate (OR=0.36; 95% CI 0.18-0.70; P-trend=0.001), oleate (OR=0.36; 95% CI 0.19-0.72; P-trend=0.002), saturated FAs (OR=0.35; 95% CI 0.18-0.67; P-trend=0.002), and monounsaturated FAs (OR=0.32; 95% CI 0.16-0.63; P-trend<0.0001) among subjects who are obese. The results suggest that substituting polyunsaturated FAs with saturated or monounsaturated FAs may reduce pancreatic cancer risk, independently of total energy intake, particularly among obese subjects. Pancreatic cancer represents the fourth leading cause of cancer- related deaths in Canada (CCS, 2004), and is among the most rapidly fatal cancer worldwide (WHO/IARC, 2003). ... cases were more likely to consume high amounts of tobacco. Two years prior to the diagnosis of cancer, a tendency towards heightened pancreatic cancer risk with increased BMI was noted, while there were no appreciable differences between cases and controls with respect to physical activity. Cases were more likely to have higher fat intake and greater total energy intake than controls. ... BMI was inversely related to palmitate, saturated and monounsaturated FAs, but not to stearate or oleate. Smoking was positively linked with palmitate, stearate, oleate, saturated and monounsaturated FAs. Educational attainment was positively associated with palmitate and inversely associated with stearate, but not with oleate, saturated or monounsaturated FAs. ... Among obese subjects, strong and significant inverse associations were apparent between stearic acid (OR=0.36; 95% CI 0.18- 0.70; P-trend=0.001), oleic acid (OR=0.36; 95% CI=0.19-0.72; P- trend=0.002), saturated FAs (OR=0.35; 95% CI 0.18-0.67; P- trend=0.002), and monounsaturated FAs (OR=0.32; 95% CI 0.16-0.61; P- trend=0.001) and pancreatic cancer risk ... A high fat intake affects pancreatic cancer risk by stimulating cholecystokinin (CCK) release, which, in rodents, increases susceptibility to carcinogens and causes acinar cell hyperplasia, followed by the development of pancreatic carcinomas (Longnecker, 1993; Chu et al, 1997). In humans, it has been suggested that duodenal CCK release might differ significantly according to the degree of fat saturation, with unsaturated FAs being stronger stimulants of CCK release than saturated FAs (Beardshall et al, 1989). In response to meals containing different fats, CCK release is enhanced by one-, two-, and six-fold for saturated, monounsaturated, and polyunsaturated FAs, respectively. ... A cohort study of pancreatic cancer indicated that dietary glycaemic load and the glycaemic index are associated with increased risk of pancreatic cancer among women who were overweight, and among obese women with low physical activity (Michaud et al, 2002). Obesity is a physiological state that is accompanied by abnormal glucose metabolism and greater insulin resistance. Since the pharmacokinetic properties of both saturated and monounsaturated FAs are not known to depend on BMI, it is likely that obese subjects may be particularly susceptible to the type of FA they consume, likely because of some degree of repression of CCK release. ... Table 3 ORsa and 95% CIs for pancreatic cancer associated with dietary fatty acids --------------------------------------- ----------------------------------Quartiles of fatty acid intakes Fatty acid Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 P-trend ------------------------------------ Palmitic acid Median (g day-1) 7.7 7.7 12 37 Cases/controls 142/1180 100/1182 107/1179 113/1180 Multivariate OR (95% CI) 1.00 0.70 (0.53-0.93) 0.74 (0.56-0.97) 0.73 (0.56-0.96) 0.02 Stearic acid MedianĀ±s.d. (g day-1) 2.7 3.1 3.9 6.8 Cases/controls 123/1180 107/1180 111/1181 121/1180 Multivariate OR (95% CI) 1.00 0.81 (0.61-1.08) 0.82 (0.62-1.09) 0.70 (0.51-0.94) 0.04 Oleic acid Median (g day-1) 13.7 14.6 17.8 28.4 Cases/controls 121/1180 112/1115 100/1181 125/1180 Multivariate OR (95% CI) 1.00 0.91 (0.69-1.20) 0.78 (0.59-1.04) 0.75 (0.55-1.02) 0.04 Saturated FAs Median (g day-1) 11.2 12.5 15.7 28.8 Cases/controls 127/1180 110/1180 108/1181 117/1180 Multivariate OR (95% CI) 1.00 0.83 (0.63-1.09) 0.79 (0.60-1.04) 0.67 (0.50-0.91) 0.01 Monounsaturated FAs Median (g day-1) 13.6 15.4 19.0 30.3 Cases/controls 122/1180 116/1181 101/1180 123/1180 Multivariate OR (95% CI) 1.00 0.88 (0.67-1.16) 0.76 (0.57-1.02) 0.72 (0.53-0.98) 0.02 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- aFA=fatty acid; OR=odds ratio; CI=confidence interval. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals from the logistic regression model adjusted for age, province, educational attainment, smoking, BMI, total fat and energy intake. Table 4 ORsa and 95% CIs for pancreatic cancer associated with saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids and body mass index ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------Quartiles of fatty acid intakes ----------------------------------------------- BMI FA Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 P-trend ----------------------------------------------- <25 Stearic acid 1.00 0.95 (0.61-1.48) 1.19 (0.78-1.81) 0.71 (0.43-1.17) 0.54 Oleic acid 0.96 (0.62-1.48) 0.92 (0.60-1.42) 0.76 (0.46-1.25) 0.28 Saturated FAs 1.12 (0.72-1.73) 1.08 (0.70-1.68) 0.79 (0.49-1.27) 0.44 Monounsaturated FAs 0.93 (0.61-1.44) 0.91 (0.59-1.41) 0.76 (0.46- 1.26) 0.30 25-29.9 Stearic acid 1.00 0.79 (0.50-1.26) 0.81 (0.51-1.29) 0.95 (0.58-1.55) 0.87 Oleic acid 1.02 (0.64-1.63) 0.88 (0.55-1.42) 1.10 (0.67-1.82) 0.90 Saturated FAs 0.92 (0.58-1.45) 0.82 (0.52-1.30) 0.84 (0.51-1.37) 0.48 Monounsaturated FAs 0.93 (0.59-1.47) 0.84 (0.52-1.35) 1.07 (0.64- 1.76) 0.97 30 Stearic acid 1.00 0.62 (0.34-1.14) 0.38 (0.20-0.74) 0.36 (0.18-0.70) 0.001 Oleic acid 0.67 (0.36-1.23) 0.36 (0.18-0.72) 0.36 (0.19-0.72) 0.002 Saturated FAs 0.40 (0.21-0.76) 0.42 (0.23-0.79) 0.35 (0.18-0.67) 0.002 Monounsaturated FAs 0.72 (0.39-1.31) 0.37 (0.19-0.73) 0.32 (0.16- 0.61) 0.001 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- aFA=fatty acid. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals from the logistic regression model adjusted for age, province, educational attainment, smoking, total fat and energy intake. Al Pater Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.