Guest guest Posted April 14, 2005 Report Share Posted April 14, 2005 Logan: the very fact that " The findings were published in a medical journal, " and no mention is made of which journal or any specifics should have raised your antennae. I suspect that the findings were not published anywhere reputable or mainstream or the good doctor would have given more information. Here is what " Quackwatch " says about Vitamin C " cures " : http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/pauling.html on 4/14/2005 8:23 AM, Logan at loganruns73@... wrote: > 13 Apr 2005 > > Imagine that a deadly virus is sweeping the world, killing and maiming > hundreds of thousands of children. Nothing seems able to stop it " until a > doctor stands up at the American Medical Association and reports on 60 cases > involving severely infected children, all of whom have been cured. Yet his > work, subsequently reported in a peer-review journal, is ignored, leaving the > virus to wreak havoc for decades. > > This isn't a docudrama about some futuristic plague " it's a true story about > what happened in June 1949 when polio was at its peak. Dr Frederick Klenner, a > clinical researcher from Reidsville, North Carolina, reported that a massive > intravenous dose of Vitamin C " up to 20,000mg daily for three days (today's > recommended daily allowance is 60mg) " had cured 60 of his patients. The > findings were published in a medical journal, yet there was virtually no > interest. Apart from a couple of minor trials, no attempt was made to find out > if they had any scientific substance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.