Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Customized Oligonucleotide Array-based Comparative Genomic Hybridization as a Clinical Assay for Genomic Profiling of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, doi:10.2353/jmoldx.2009.080037

Customized Oligonucleotide Array-based Comparative Genomic Hybridization as a

Clinical Assay for Genomic Profiling of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Sargent*, Dan *, Lynne V. Abruzzo*, Hui Yao, Bonderover*,

Marissa Cisneros*, G. Wierda, J. Keating, and Rajyalakshmi

Luthra*@

From the Department of Hematopathology,* the Division of Quantitative Sciences,

and the Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas M. D. Cancer

Center, Houston, Texas

@ To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: rluthra@... .

Abstract

Chromosome gains and losses used for risk stratification in chronic lymphocytic

leukemia (CLL) are commonly assessed by multiprobe fluorescence in situ

hybridization (FISH) studies. We designed and validated a customized

array-comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) platform as a clinical assay for

CLL genomic profiling. A 60-mer, 44,000-probe oligonucleotide array with a 50-kb

average spatial resolution was augmented with high-density probe tiling at loci

that are frequently aberrant in CLL. Aberrations identified by aCGH were

compared with those identified by a FISH panel, including locus-specific probes

to ATM (11q22.3), the centromeric region of chromosome 12 (12p11.1-q11), D13S319

(13q14.3), LAMP1 (13q34), and TP53 (17p13.1). In 100 CLL samples, aCGH/FISH

concordance was seen for 89% of FISH-called aberrations at the ATM (n = 18),

D13S319 (n = 42), LAMP (n = 12), and TP53 (n = 22) loci and for chromosome 12 (n

= 14). Eighty-four percentage of FISH/aCGH discordant calls were in samples

either at or below the limit of aCGH sensitivity (10% to 25% FISH

aberration-containing cells). Therefore, aCGH profiling is a feasible routine

clinical test with comparable results to multiprobe FISH studies; however, it

may be less sensitive than FISH in cases with low-level aberrations. Further, a

customized array design can provide comprehensive genomic profiling with

additional accuracy in both identifying and defining the extent of small

aberrations at target loci.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...