Guest guest Posted April 21, 2005 Report Share Posted April 21, 2005 I suppose Francesca will chime in with " read the book or files! " I favor regular moderate exercise including resistance exercise (free weights for me), aerobics (walking, eliptical trainer, etc. for me), balance enhancing exercise, and flexibility training (yoga applies to the latter two items for me). On 4/21/05, ymmas808 <ymmas808@...> wrote: > > > okay if CR slows the metabolism thereby decreasing free radicals from oxidation of energy > (ae less cellular stress/damage) then wouldnt it make sense that exercising is bad because > it also increases free radicals? > > also, i have read that severe calorie restriction really only can decrease metabolism by at > most 30%, so wouldn't it make sense that fasting is the quickest and most effective way to > burn fat stores? > > excuse my ignorance, but it just doesnt add up to me. > CR=slowed metabolism=less oxidative stress and free radical damage=longer lifespan > > but > > exercise=more oxidation, higher metabolism= better health and longer lifespan? > > is there a scientist in the house? > > and on that note, what exercise do our fellow cronies incorporate into their lives or do you > all just try and lead active lifestyles? > > sammy > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 21, 2005 Report Share Posted April 21, 2005 I don't incorporate much of any special exercise. I find that if I exercise very much it tends to create food cravings and a mental justification for overeating. I do stretching exercises, pushups, crunches, and use a heavy dumbell. It doesn't burn that many calories, but helps me feel and look stronger. I also walk whenever not absolutely necessary to take transportation, but it doesn't amount to much in the way of calorie burning -- maybe 100 a day. chrisymmas808 <ymmas808@...> wrote: and on that note, what exercise do our fellow cronies incorporate into their lives or do you all just try and lead active lifestyles?sammy__________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 21, 2005 Report Share Posted April 21, 2005 Hi Sammy: This has been discussed extensively here previously. Some exercise seems to be absolutely necessary - bed-ridden people do not live long. Beyond that how much do we need? There are many studies showing cardiac benefit from exercise. But one wonders whether it adds any further benefit beyond the huge cardiac benefits of CRON. It also clearly benefits bone strength. In addition if we are hoping to live to 100+ then when we get there we are going to need the strength, endurance and flexibility to do the things we will want to still be able to do. That likely does not mean a huge amount of exercise. But it does suggest some extra- curriclar exercise would be beneficial. People generally seem to agree that a lot of exercise is not necessary and does produce extra free radicals. Walford took, by my standards, a huge amount of exercise. Rodney. --- In , " ymmas808 " <ymmas808@y...> wrote: > > okay if CR slows the metabolism thereby decreasing free radicals from oxidation of energy > (ae less cellular stress/damage) then wouldnt it make sense that exercising is bad because > it also increases free radicals? > > also, i have read that severe calorie restriction really only can decrease metabolism by at > most 30%, so wouldn't it make sense that fasting is the quickest and most effective way to > burn fat stores? > > excuse my ignorance, but it just doesnt add up to me. > CR=slowed metabolism=less oxidative stress and free radical damage=longer lifespan > > but > > exercise=more oxidation, higher metabolism= better health and longer lifespan? > > is there a scientist in the house? > > and on that note, what exercise do our fellow cronies incorporate into their lives or do you > all just try and lead active lifestyles? > > sammy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 21, 2005 Report Share Posted April 21, 2005 Here is the file on How much Exercise. I would encourage everyone to read the files. That's the reason they''re there. Dr. Walford explains on pp 246-248 of " Beyond the 120 Year Diet " and in several other places in the book that too much exercise is incompatible with CRON. However some people find that their quality of life suffers without lots of exercise. Here a few posts from the group which summarize the salient points about exercise: /message/16770 /message/11196 /message/10234 /message/11742 Francesca on 4/21/2005 2:24 AM, ymmas808 at ymmas808@... wrote: > > okay if CR slows the metabolism thereby decreasing free radicals from > oxidation of energy > (ae less cellular stress/damage) then wouldnt it make sense that exercising is > bad because > it also increases free radicals? > > also, i have read that severe calorie restriction really only can decrease > metabolism by at > most 30%, so wouldn't it make sense that fasting is the quickest and most > effective way to > burn fat stores? > > excuse my ignorance, but it just doesnt add up to me. > CR=slowed metabolism=less oxidative stress and free radical damage=longer > lifespan > > but > > exercise=more oxidation, higher metabolism= better health and longer lifespan? > > is there a scientist in the house? > > and on that note, what exercise do our fellow cronies incorporate into their > lives or do you > all just try and lead active lifestyles? > > sammy > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.