Guest guest Posted May 13, 2005 Report Share Posted May 13, 2005 This link to the Office of Dietary Supplements seems to agree, but puts the toxic doses for most at around 4x RDA. http://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/vitamind.asp - --- In , " cronzen " <truepatriot@m...> wrote: > Is this true?! This paragraph implicates fat-free milks > due to the addition of " toxic " synthetic vitamin D (D3). > > Thanks, > - > > > " Along with valuable trace minerals and short-chain fatty acids, > butterfat is America's best source of preformed vitamin D. Synthetic > vitamin D, known to be toxic to the liver, is added to replace the > natural vitamin D complex in butterfat. Butterfat also contains re- > arranged acids which have strong anticarcinogenic properties. " > > Pariza, M. W., " Newly recognized anti-carcinogenic fatty acid > identification and quantification in natural and processed cheeses " , > J. Ag. Food Chem. 1989:37, pp. 75-81. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 13, 2005 Report Share Posted May 13, 2005 Hi : Whenever I have a question about micronutrients, one of the places I take a look at is the website of the Linus ing Institute at Oregon State University. They seem to be trying to do a decent job of providing objective information. They do discuss toxicity of vitamin D. But do not appear to be too concerned about it. This is what they say: " Toxicity Vitamin D toxicity (hypervitaminosis D) induces abnormally high serum calcium levels (hypercalcemia), which could result in bone loss, kidney stones, and calcification of organs like the heart and kidneys if untreated over a long period of time. When the Food and Nutrition Board of the Institute of Medicine established the tolerable upper intake level (UL) for vitamin D, published studies that adequately documented the lowest intake levels of vitamin D that induced hypercalcemia were very limited. Because the consequences of hypercalcemia are severe, the Food and Nutrition Board established a very conservative UL of 2,000 IU/day (50 mcg/day) for children and adults (see table below) (28). Research published since 1997 suggests that the UL for adults is likely overly conservative and that vitamin D toxicity is very unlikely in healthy people at intake levels lower than 10,000 IU/day (36, 76, 77). Vitamin D toxicity has not been observed to result from sun exposure. Certain medical conditions can increase the risk of hypercalcemia in response to vitamin D, including primary hyperparathyroidism, sarcoidosis, tuberculosis, and lymphoma (36). People with these conditions may develop hypercalcemia in response to any increase in vitamin D nutrition and should consult a qualified health care provider regarding any increase in vitamin D intake. Tolerable Upper Intake Level (UL) for Vitamin D -------- Age Group -mcg/day (IU/day) ------- ----------- ------- --------- Infants 0-12 months 25 mcg (1000 IU) Children 1-18 years 50 mcg (2000 IU) Adults - 19 years + 50 mcg (2000 IU) " Here is the link: http://lpi.oregonstate.edu/infocenter/vitamins/vitaminD/index.html http://snipurl.com/evg7 Rodney. > > Is this true?! This paragraph implicates fat-free milks > > due to the addition of " toxic " synthetic vitamin D (D3). > > > > Thanks, > > - > > > > > > " Along with valuable trace minerals and short-chain fatty acids, > > butterfat is America's best source of preformed vitamin D. > Synthetic > > vitamin D, known to be toxic to the liver, is added to replace the > > natural vitamin D complex in butterfat. Butterfat also contains re- > > arranged acids which have strong anticarcinogenic properties. " > > > > Pariza, M. W., " Newly recognized anti-carcinogenic fatty acid > > identification and quantification in natural and processed cheeses " , > > J. Ag. Food Chem. 1989:37, pp. 75-81. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2005 Report Share Posted May 14, 2005 Thanks, Rodney. I feel a _little_ better. This was another concern I had with my recently discussed increase in (homemade) cultured milk product consumption. It makes no mention of liver toxicity, focusing instead on the hypercalcemia angle (the topic of my first milk post). The Ag Food Journal citation was pulled from a website that advocates raw and/or full fat milk, stating that the natural forms of vitamin D therein are safe, whereas fortified skim milk contains the toxic synthetic variety (as would multivitamins). - > > > Is this true?! This paragraph implicates fat-free milks > > > due to the addition of " toxic " synthetic vitamin D (D3). > > > > > > Thanks, > > > - > > > > > > > > > " Along with valuable trace minerals and short-chain fatty acids, > > > butterfat is America's best source of preformed vitamin D. > > Synthetic > > > vitamin D, known to be toxic to the liver, is added to replace > the > > > natural vitamin D complex in butterfat. Butterfat also contains > re- > > > arranged acids which have strong anticarcinogenic properties. " > > > > > > Pariza, M. W., " Newly recognized anti-carcinogenic fatty acid > > > identification and quantification in natural and processed > cheeses " , > > > J. Ag. Food Chem. 1989:37, pp. 75-81. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.