Guest guest Posted September 13, 2011 Report Share Posted September 13, 2011 Re: CLL HSCs - implications? At 01:38 PM 9/12/2011, Al Janski wrote: > " CLL and leukemic stem cells " (Dr.Hamblin's blog, Sept12) >http://mutated-unmuated.blogspot.com/2011/09/cll-and-leukemic-stem-cells.html SNIP........Dr. Hamblin wrote: " The concept if that there is a damaged hemopoietic stem cell (HSC) that feeds in to the tumor that does not carry the same markers as the tumor and would therefore not be susceptible to the type of treatment that would be effective for the bulk of the tumor cells. " One of the implications of Dr. Hamblin's insight (that CLL HSCs would not be susceptible to effective treatments for mature CLL cells) is that it also applies to the recently published CART19 Tcell immunotherapy (by June & coworkers; in Porter et al. & Kalos, et al.; links below). If indeed CLL HSCs are the predecessor cells to mature CLL cells, then targeting CD19 with CART19 Tcells would not be expected to eliminate CLL, because CLL HSCs are negative for CD19 (Kikushige et al., link below). However, CART19 therapy may still be effective in keeping the disease under control, by eliminating the predecessor CLL cells (e.g. pro-Bcells), which would evolve from CLL HSCs but are positive for CD19. As such, for prolonged benefit, it would be necessary for memory CART19 Tcells to endure and remain competent to be activated by CD19 protein antigen. Interestingly, CD19 positive " stem-like " CLL cells have been isolated (by Gross et al. 2010, and others). These " side-population " (SP) CLL cells were chemoresistant to fludarabine, and existed innately in patients, as well as being increased ( " acquired " ) after fludarabine treatment. These SP CLL cells may be derived from maturation of CLL HSCs and may be predecessors to some of the mature CLL cell population, which might then be more chemoresistant than other CLL cells derived from other precursor cells. Further, isolated CLL SP cells have been used for vaccination in patients ( et al., 2010), eliciting a cytotoxic Tcell response that was specific for CLL SP cells, rather than for mature CLL cells. However, the anti-SP CLL T-cell response was lost 4–6 weeks after vaccine administration ceased. Apparently, a good memory Tcell response, like that observed in the CART19 study, did not exist for this anti-SP response. What is interesting is that et al. could not detect any unique 'surface' antigen on SP CLL cells that was not present on the larger population of CLL cells. And it is noteworthy that the process by which the stem-like SP CLL cells are isolated involves first selecting for cells containing proteins (i.e. " ABC transporter proteins " ) that are 'not' on the cell surface, but are 'intracellular' proteins that are known to serve to pump out chemotherapeutic agents (e.g. fludarabine) from a variety of cancer cells, thus making them chemoresistant. Before vaccination of patients, this knowledge was used to enrich the SP CLL preparation by killing off residual non-SP CLL cells with fludarabine. The possibility exists that the immunogenicity of SP cells was related to an 'intracellular' protein antigen (e.g. an ABC transporter protein), despite that notion being contrary to conventional understanding of cellular antigenicity. However, that convention may be changing. Specifically, published last week, a paper (by Guo et al.) demonstrated anti-tumor activity from either exogenously administered antibodies or from host-induced antibodies (i.e. vaccination) against 'intracellular' tumor antigens. The authors concluded that " This study suggests that antibody-based therapy and vaccination against cancer may be extended to a wider variety of intracellular oncoproteins as therapeutic targets. With cancer treatment becoming more individualized, the ability to target a whole new list of intracellular oncoproteins previously thought to be untargetable by therapeutic antibodies or vaccinations can expand the scope for tailor-made cancer therapy as well as usher in a new era of tailor-made cancer vaccines. " Consequently, maybe it is not necessary that the CART therapy technology target only surface antigens (like CD19) on CLL cells, or surface antigens on CLL HSCs, etc. Maybe better antigen targets can be identified in the intracellular space of CLL cells, such that benefits (like not eliminating CD19 normal Bcells) can be achieved. Al Janski REFERENCES: " Self-Renewing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Is the Primary Target in Pathogenesis of Human Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia " ; Y. Kikushige et al.; Cancer Cell 20, 246259, August 16, 2011 ABSTRACT: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1535610811002595 " Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Modified T Cells in Chronic Lymphoid Leukemia " ; D.L.Porter et al.; N Engl J Med 2011; 365:725-733 ABSTRACT: <http://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMoa1103849>http://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/1\ 0.1056/NEJMoa1103849 " T Cells with Chimeric Antigen Receptors Have Potent Antitumor Effects and Can Establish Memory in Patients with Advanced Leukemia " ; M. Kalos, et al.; Science Translational Medicine, Vol 3 Issue 95 95ra73, p.1-11. FULL-TEXT: http://stm.sciencemag.org/content/3/95/95ra73.full.pdf " B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia chemoresistance involves innate and acquired leukemic side population cells. " , E. Gross et al.; Leukemia 24, 1885-1892 (November 2010) ABSTRACT: http://www.nature.com/leu/journal/v24/n11/full/leu2010176a.html " Selective elimination of a chemoresistant side population of B-CLL cells by cytotoxic T lymphocytes in subjects receiving an autologous hCD40L/IL-2 tumor vaccine " AE et al.; Leukemia (2010) 24, 563–572 FULL-TEXT: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2836398/pdf/nihms165734.pdf " Targeting Intracellular Oncoproteins with Antibody Therapy or Vaccination " ; Ke Guo et al.; Science Translational Medicine September 7, 2011 Vol 3 Issue 99 99ra85 ABSTRACT: http://stm.sciencemag.org/content/3/99/99ra85 PRESS RELEASE: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/09/110908104205.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 14, 2011 Report Share Posted September 14, 2011 Dr. Keating of MDACC has given his viewpoint on Chimeric Antigen Receptors (CARS) in CLL Dr. Wierda answers some common questions on this topic May be of interest to some... http://tinyurl.com/43v9cmq Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.