Guest guest Posted May 12, 2005 Report Share Posted May 12, 2005 Rodney said: " People who have knowedge of things like CRON can try to send a message. But if that message is ignored. If it is (in effect) ridiculed. If those on the receiving end of it do not care enough about their health to make a little effort to find out the facts for themselves and then do something ... then why should the experts, and us here, care? " One of the problems that I see in getting the message out is that nobody can define " CRON " in practical terms. In the laboratory, Caloric Restriction (CR) is implemented against a standard: animals fed ad libitum. In this way, scientists can say that one group is being fed 30% less than the control group. Nothing similar exists for humans. I have tried to convince you that the -Benedict equations and a BMI of 22 could be used as an objective reference point, but this suggestion has received a lukewarm reception. The bottom line is that there is no widely accepted way of measuring percent of caloric restriction for humans. Equally undefined is the term Optimum Nutrition (ON). We can theoretically say that ON is a diet that has everything that you need to thrive. So, where are the perfectly balanced chow pellets for humans? They don't exist. We tend to put our philosophical ideas ahead of our nutritional needs. People who don't eat meats because of religious or ethical principles clearly are in this category. But each of us has preferences or idiosyncrasies that may prevent us from getting the perfect balance of nutrients. When was the last time that you ate liver, or kidney pie? Have you ever eaten tripe or brains? Yuck! is the typical reaction. Yet, optimal nutrition could require something that we avoid because of philosophical or cultural reasons. Our great genetic diversity also contributes to our inability to define ON. It is probably impossible to have an optimum diet to which nobody is allergic. So what possible advise can we give about CRON when we can only talk in generalities? How can we not be misunderstood? I think that we have a better chance of defining CR than ON, but I am not holding my breath. Tony Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.