Guest guest Posted June 18, 2005 Report Share Posted June 18, 2005 Hi All, The below is forwarded, with permission from the sender. A Tale of Two CRONies Two middle-aged men, cognizant of their fleeting mortality, and wowed by the persuasive arguments Roy Walford assembled in his classic book, decided to set out to cut calories, and improve nutrition. The first man had never been overweight, at least by most standards, and started at 1.9 m and 80 kg (BMI = 22.16), began relentlessly cutting calories, focusing on vegetables, some fruit, limited whole grains, and nuts, with occasional fish. After losing 12.5% of his previous body weight (70 kg, BMI = 19.39) many of his biomarkers improved greatly, including blood pressure (135/85 -> 110/70), cholesterol (HDL/LDL = 121/44 -> 99/76) triglycerides (148 -> 52). However, he decided, in part by reading CR Society Digests, to soldier on to lower BMI, becoming gradually more obsessed with body weight, and continuing to lower calories from 1900 to 1800 to 1700. He became weaker and weaker, and decided to curtail exercise; and the constant hunger, while not unbearable, made socializing with other people a little awkward, so he began turning inward, and avoiding many of these occasions, out of convenience. Spending time reading articles on CR, nutrition, etc., and fiddling with food preparation and shopping, he gradually seemed to lose interest in many things that had previously given him great joy. His weight plummeted finally, over 12 more months, to 63 kg, at which point a WUSTL visit showed ~0 % fat, very little musculature, and a " flunk " on the OGTT, with a two-hour reading of 142 mg/dl after a 75 gram challenge of pure glucose solution. Although he had previously been a runner, lack of energy had forced him to walk, if that, and so the fitness test did not go well either, with an " above average " VO2_max but nothing like the level of fitness he had previously enjoyed. Although people began commenting that he " looked terrible " and his friends and family had urged him to stop being so extreme, it seemed that CR itself had become a strange raison d'etre, and he stubbornly refused or ignored their exhortations. It was only a " talking to " from Dr. Fontana that convinced this victim of midlife crisis that his approach was not necessarily going to harvest great gains in longevity, but was certainly affecting almost every aspect of his life right now, and most in adverse ways. In particular, this level of CR was much like seeing a black-and-white film: he didn't realize right away that it was not in color unless, as in the Wizard of Oz, he saw a sudden switch. At that point he couldn't imagine living in a world of grays. In the world of grays, very little creative scientific work was accomplished, leaving this first man with a sputtering career path, even though he had previously been highly successful. In fact during severe CR not a single graduate student elected to join his research group, preferring not to risk the possibility that the advisor might be on his last legs. The second man made many of the mistakes of the first, but finally decided that a BMI between 19.5 and 20.5 is fine. His biomarkers continued to improve, and he exercised vigorously, and sometimes for extended periods, to maintain muscle mass and aerobic fitness. To avoid losing weight, he then simply ate a bit more. Taking a CR lite approach, he didn't really mind operating this way, and the mental benefits of exercise far outweighed, for our #2, the hypothetical " damage " from more calories or oxidative stress. Not overly obsessed with food, he settled on more of a rough-and-tumble approach, and did not adopt an adversarial relationship with food, nor did he cross off verboten foods, reckoning that the dose makes the poison in these cases. He didn't spend too much time or money on testing ( " monetary restriction " ), viewed most of the " breaking " results on this or that development with a wry and skeptical grin, and did not believe that he would live to be 160, 120 or even 100, regardless of how abstemious his diet became. After all, if it were " calories, calories, calories " then, to paraphrase Dr. Walford, where is the 160 year-old human? There have been billions of people, many have been very, very careful not to overeat, and to suppose that if CR were a major effect that we wouldn't know about it already flies in the face of probability and statistics. No, he thought, even Dr. Walford, rest his soul, could not escape the Grim Reaper, and genetics, chance, and myriad other factors enter in. Humans *already* live more than twice as long as the closest primate relatives. After all, his own father handily outlived Dr. Walford, and never restricted a single calorie, but rather never became overweight, stayed active walking 5 miles per day into his 80s, and enjoyed vegetables, fruits, and less healthful fare in moderation. No he thought, it's much deeper than the perfunctory " QOL " that appears from time to time, mostly as an annoyance that prevents even more severe CR. Merely existing longer has nothing much to recommend it, unless perhaps you're a historian or so afraid of your inevitable demise that you cling to a thin thread of hope that there will eventually be a pill to halt aging (or, while we're daydreaming, how about reversing it, so you can remain 22 forever instead of 122?). The key is to live; that life is limited in duration gives it more meaning, and makes each moment precious. Existing in a fringe metabolic Twilight Zone to gain a few more years, and they are at the end, I'm afraid, by definition, just didn't make any sense to our #2. And wasting a ton of time obsessing about this or that " mistake " means that your supposed life extension gains are more than swallowed up tabulating data in Nutribase! As Bernard Shaw wrote in the introduction to the Doctor's Dilemma: Do not try to live forever—you will not succeed. I could continue the tale, but I suspect that you may have already guessed that both our players are in fact Yours Truly. My conclusion: eating well is very important, as is eating lite. But diet is no panacea and, ultimately, should occupy a pretty small mental space in one's life. It doesn't take much effort to stay lean, muscular, active, and vigorous while avoiding the obviously awful habits of most people. But to erroneously promulgate the calories, calories, calories mantra is a huge oversimplification. Life will be limited in duration no matter what advances are made: Enjoy the ride. -- A. J. Shaka Al Pater, PhD; email: old542000@... __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.