Guest guest Posted December 20, 2008 Report Share Posted December 20, 2008 So, what do we do now? We elected a full blown government-paid for everything... What's left? To sell vacant seats in the Congress for a huge profit? Sorry for injecting politics here, on this site. Alec @...: scott_fs@...: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 03:56:52 +0000Subject: Coming changes in healthcare in the US? Probably the area of greatest interest/concern to CLL patients in theUnited States is the issue of health care. Sweeping changes haveapparently been in development, ranging from changes in insurance tofull-blown government-paid health care.I suspect that the latter will be proposed.I urge all of you who are tempted by the siren song of 'free' healthcare study the CLL drugs that are available in Canada, the UK, andother countries. My concern is that it will make drugs that are nowavailable, just not available. Rituximab, for example, isn't paid forby some countries for CLL, because it's too expensive.My biggest problem with socialized medicine is that with thegovernment paying for it, suddenly health care will have to competewith defense, schools, welfare, highway construction etc. for thefederal dollar. If drugs that are currently available and covered by some insurance istaken away, CLL patients will die for lack of access to these drugs. My solution is that we steer people away from emergency rooms, openurgent care clinics that accept cash and Medicade.Remember, we don't have a health care problem. We have an healthinsurance problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 21, 2008 Report Share Posted December 21, 2008 Hi , As an Australian, I am certainly pleased that our country was able to pay for my Rituxan treatment, as well as my Campath and then, when it became necessary, they also paid for my BMT. The major expense in my treatment thus far has been the cost of parking at the hospital. Not only am I not aware of any drugs which are in use in the States which are not available over here but also, from what I hear, the amount paid for treatments by the government over here is way below the sums charged to US insurance companies. I don't know of Canada, but I do know of many people who have received Rituxan in the UK. , perhaps you are confused by the fact that Rituximab is named Mabthera outside the US. I've spent a bit of time in the States and I don't reckon the quality of roads and schools is any better over there than here. Certainly the public welfare is inferior to many countries that offer publicly funded health care. I take your point that the US problem is actually a health insurance problem; in fact there appear to be a number of insurance problems. Firstly, a lot of people aren't insured. Secondly, an enormous proportion of claims seem to be denied; and thirdly, a large portion of the money which goes to health care goes to insurance companies and their shareholders rather than to the funding of the health care itself, making insurance very expensive. I suspect that this fear mongering of yours will not have any effect in preventing Americans from finally achieving this terrific change to their system. If a country like Australia can afford free health care then why can't the US? Hopefully in future I will hear of less people in the US complaining and dying because they are unable to afford a required treatment. A stem cell transplant for CLL is no longer an experimental treatment yet it is so often used by US insurance companies to justify a denial of claim. It's just heartbreaking. I hope no one takes this as a criticism of the US in any way; if so it is certainly not my intention. Rather I am merely trying to give credit to a system over here that has saved my life and for which I am very grateful. This is no " siren song " . Best wishes to all my CLL brothers and sisters. Cheers . _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of S. Sent: Sunday, 21 December 2008 2:57 PM Subject: Coming changes in healthcare in the US? Probably the area of greatest interest/concern to CLL patients in the United States is the issue of health care. Sweeping changes have apparently been in development, ranging from changes in insurance to full-blown government-paid health care. I suspect that the latter will be proposed. I urge all of you who are tempted by the siren song of 'free' health care study the CLL drugs that are available in Canada, the UK, and other countries. My concern is that it will make drugs that are now available, just not available. Rituximab, for example, isn't paid for by some countries for CLL, because it's too expensive. My biggest problem with socialized medicine is that with the government paying for it, suddenly health care will have to compete with defense, schools, welfare, highway construction etc. for the federal dollar. If drugs that are currently available and covered by some insurance is taken away, CLL patients will die for lack of access to these drugs. My solution is that we steer people away from emergency rooms, open urgent care clinics that accept cash and Medicade. Remember, we don't have a health care problem. We have an health insurance problem. __________ NOD32 3709 (20081220) Information __________ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. part000.txt - is OK part001.htm - is OK http://www.eset.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 21, 2008 Report Share Posted December 21, 2008 The iniquity of the American health care system has always appalled me, even more so now that I see the difficulties of my fellow CLL victims in the States. If I were able to, I would have voted for the most radical reform, and I hope the new presidency brings it. best wishes Andy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 23, 2008 Report Share Posted December 23, 2008 I looked up iniquity when I saw your message Karl, and I got the following - " Definitions of iniquity on the Web: * absence of moral or spiritual values; " the powers of darkness " * evil: morally objectionable behavior * injustice: an unjust act wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn * Iniquity was a Danish death metal group. Established in 1989, the band released three full-length albums before parting ways in 2004. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iniquity * Gross immorality or injustice, wickedness. Often interchangeable with the noun, " sin " (eg, Exod 34:9; Rom 6:19). www.philosophy-religion.org/bible/glossary_new-interpreters-bible.htm " - I didn't look it up when I first wrote it, but I was certainly getting at the first and third definition above. Inequality is almost what I meant, but I like the more forceful " absence of moral or spiritual values " that iniquity implies. Have a great Christmas holiday all Andy > > Did you mean inequality or iniquity : ) > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.