Guest guest Posted December 20, 2008 Report Share Posted December 20, 2008 CCO Independent Conference Coverage of the American Society of Hematology 2008 Annual Meeting* *CCO is an independent medical education company that provides state-of-the-art medical information to healthcare professionals through conference coverage and other educational programs. Combination of CMC-544 and Rituximab Produces High Response Rates in Relapsed FL and DLBCL Patients Posting Date: December 11, 2008 a.. Preliminary results of ongoing nonrandomized phase I/II study[1] Summary of Key Conclusions a.. Inotuzumab ozogamicin (CMC-544) added to rituximab produced high response rates in patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma (FL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) a.. Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of inotuzumab ozogamicin achieved b.. CR and PR achieved at all dose levels of inotuzumab ozogamicin b.. Thrombocytopenia most frequent and dose-limiting toxicity but manageable c.. Long-term follow-up ongoing Background a.. CD22 expressed in > 90% of B-cell lymphomas a.. Represents novel therapeutic target in non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL) b.. Inotuzumab ozogamicin a.. Cytotoxin calicheamicin conjugated to a humanized polyclonal IgG4 anti-CD22 antibody b.. Active at MTD in phase I study of heavily treated patients with FL and DLBCL[2] c.. Active in murine model resistant to rituximab d.. Effective as single-agent in heavily treated NHL patients a.. Thrombocytopenia and neutropenia most common hematologic toxicities c.. Current study sought to evaluate safety and efficacy of inotuzumab ozogamicin plus rituximab in patients with recurrent CD22+ B-cell lymphomas a.. FL and DLBCL Summary of Study Design a.. Eligibility criteria a.. CD22+ B-cell NHL with progression after 1-2 previous therapies b.. Rituximab-sensitive FL and DLBCL a.. Remains responsive to rituximab > 6 months from treatment initiation c.. ECOG performance score 0-2 d.. Absolute neutrophil count ? 1500 cells/mm3 e.. Platelet count ? 75,000 cells/mm3 b.. Exclusion criteria a.. Previous allogeneic bone marrow transplantation b.. Previous autologous stem cell transplantation < 6 months from study entry c.. Dosing regimen a.. Rituximab 375 mg/m2 on Day 1 b.. Inotuzumab ozogamicin 0.8, 1.3, or 1.8 mg/m2 on Day 2 c.. Four 28-day cycles a.. Up to 8 cycles for patients with clinical benefit after 4 cycles d.. Patients restaged after every 2 cycles e.. 2-part study a.. Dose escalation of inotuzumab ozogamicin up to MTD b.. Preliminary efficacy evaluated in patients receiving MTD a.. FL: n = 30 b.. DLBCL: n = 30 f.. Dose-limiting toxicity defined as a.. Grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicity b.. Neutropenia with fever c.. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia requiring platelet transfusion d.. Grade 4 thrombocytopenia lasting ? 3 days e.. Delayed recovery from any toxicity which delays next dose by > 2 weeks Baseline Characteristics Characteristic Study Cohort (n = 74) Male, % 58 Median age, yrs (range) 65 (29-85) Tumor histology, % a.. FL 55 a.. DLBCL 45 Elevated LDH, % 30 Tumor size, % a.. > 5.0 cm 35 a.. > 7.5 cm 14 Prior ASCT, % 11 Disease stage III/IV, % 68 ASCT, autologous stem cell transplantation; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase. Main Findings a.. Most patients received MTD of 1.8 mg/m2 inotuzumab ozogamicin a.. ORR: 70% (CR plus unconfirmed CR [CRu] plus PR) b.. Inotuzumab ozogamicin at MTD equally effective in FL and DLBCL c.. PFS rate at 6 months in intent-to-treat population receiving MTD a.. FL: 93% (80% confidence interval [CI]: 83% to 97%) b.. DLBCL: 65% (80% CI: 48% to 78%) a.. Median PFS: 460 days Response Rate, % Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Dose 0.8 mg/m2 1.3 mg/m2 1.8 mg/m2 All Doses FL n = 1 n = 2 n = 29 n = 32 a.. OR 100 100 72 75 a.. CR/CRu 100 50 45 47 a.. PR 0 50 27 28 DLBCL n = 5 n = 1 n = 24 n = 30 a.. OR 20 100 79 70 a.. CR/CRu 20 0 37 33 a.. PR 0 100 42 37 a.. Thrombocytopenia most common hematologic toxicity a.. Clinically manageable, self limiting b.. 1 patient experienced dose-limiting toxicity due to low absolute neutrophil counts Hematologic Adverse Events, n (%) Study Cohort* (n = 74) Any Grade Grade 3/4 Thrombocytopenia 28 (38) 15 (20) Neutropenia 16 (22) 11 (15) Lymphopenia 4 (5) 4 (5) *Inotuzumab ozogamicin MTD: 1.8 mg/m2 (n = 59); 0.8 mg/m2 (n = 5); 1.3 mg/m2 (n = 3); 1.8 mg/m2 (n = 7). a.. Nausea and fatigue most common nonhematologic toxicities b.. Nearly 1/3 of patients with elevated aspartate aminotransferase level Nonhematologic Adverse Events (Any Grade), n (%) Study Cohort* (n = 74) Nausea 30 (41) Fatigue 24 (32) Pyrexia 14 (19) Chills 13 (18) Vomiting 13 (18) Headache 10 (14) Elevated AST 21 (28) Elevated ALT 11 (15) Elevated alkaline phosphatase 13 (18) ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase. *Inotuzumab MTD: 1.8 mg/m2 (n = 59); 0.8 mg/m2 (n = 5); 1.3 mg/m2 (n = 3); 1.8 mg/m2 (n = 7). a.. Pharmacokinetics (n = 34) a.. Inotuzumab ozogamicin exposure dependent on dose and treatment cycles a.. Comparable to single-agent exposure b.. No patients developed anti-inotuzumab ozogamicin antibodies during treatment c.. Mean free calicheamicin levels remained < 3 ng/mL References 1. Fayad L, Patel H, Verhoef G, et al. Safety and clinical activity of the anti-CD22 immunoconjugate inotuzumab ozogamicin (CMC-544) in combination with rituximab in follicular lymphoma or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: preliminary report of a phase 1/2 study. Program and abstracts of the 50th American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting and Exposition; December 6-9, 2008; San Francisco, California. Abstract 266. 2. Fayad L, Patel H, Verhoef G, et al. Clinical activity of the immunoconjugate CMC-544 in B-cell Malignancies: Preliminary report of the expanded maximum tolerated dose (MTD) cohort of a phase I study. Program and abstracts of the American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting and Exposition; December 9-12, 2006; Orlando, Florida. Abstract 2711. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.